# 176.103.3.249 — IP Intelligence Summary

176.103.3.249 is an IPv4 address operated by DIALOGKOM-MNT (AS56812), geolocated to Balakliya, Ukraine. As of October 6, 2026, IPDebrief rates it Moderate Risk (40/100); no anonymizing service was detected.

- Canonical page: https://ipdebrief.com/176.103.3.249
- Last updated: 2026-10-06

## Ownership

- Organization: DIALOGKOM-MNT
- Network name: DIALOG-NET
- Allocated block: 176.103.0.0/19
- ASN: AS56812 (https://ipdebrief.com/asn/56812)
- Regional registry: RIPE

## Location

- City: Balakliya
- Region: Kharkivs’ka Oblast’
- Country: Ukraine
- Time zone: Europe/Kyiv

## Network classification

- Infrastructure type: —
- Datacenter / hosting: no
- Residential: no
- Mobile: no
- Anycast: no
- Tor exit node: no
- VPN: no
- Proxy: no

## Risk assessment

- Assessment: Moderate Risk (40/100)
- Blocklist listings: 0
- Suspicious activity indicators: no
- Spam source: no

## Analyst narrative

\# IP Intelligence Briefing: 176.103.3.249/32

**Classification:** Moderate Risk | **Analysis Date:** Current | **Status:** Active

\## Executive Summary

IP address 176.103.3.249 presents a moderate risk profile (score: 40/100) with no active threat indicators. The address is assigned to DIALOGKOM-MNT (ASN 56812) within the DIALOG-NET network block (176.103.0.0/19) under RIPE RIR registration. The IP currently shows no open services, is not classified as a proxy/Tor node, and has no known attacker associations. However, the subnet exhibits elevated abuse density (2%) with one high-risk neighbor (176.103.3.3, risk score 80).

\## Network Profile & Ownership

\- **Organization:** DIALOGKOM-MNT

\- **ASN:** 56812

\- **Network Block:** 176.103.0.0/19

\- **Geographic Indicators:** Profile indicates United Kingdom (GB), though observation history shows inconsistent geographic resolution with Ukraine (UA) signals, suggesting potential geolocation ambiguity.

\- **Network Role:** Firewalled / No Services detected

\- **Control Plane:** Route stability flagged as false; DNSSEC validation enabled

\## Threat Assessment

\- **Risk Score:** 40/100 (Moderate)

\- **Abuse Confidence:** Not available

\- **Known Threat Indicators:** None

\- **Tor Exit Node:** No

\- **Known Attacker:** No

\- **Spam Source:** No

\- **Blacklist Count:** 0

\- **DNSBL Listings:** 2 of 8 lists (max severity: high)

\- **Campaign Associations:** None identified

\## Behavioral Observations

\- **Service Exposure:** No open ports detected; services remain firewalled

\- **Email Authentication:** No SPF, DMARC, or TXT records

\- **TLS/Certificate Data:** None observed

\- **Honeypot Hits:** 0

\- **Enumeration Strikes:** 0

\- **WAF Violations:** 0

\- **Total Incidents:** 0

\- **Threat Persistence:** Not persistently malicious

\## Neighborhood Analysis

The /24 subnet (176.103.3.0/24) contains 50 sibling IPs with the following risk distribution:

\- **High Risk:** 1 IP (176.103.3.3, score: 80)

\- **Medium Risk:** 36 IPs (scores: 40-55)

\- **Low Risk:** 12 IPs

\- **Subnet Abuse Density:** 2% (0.02)

The presence of one high-risk neighbor warrants attention when monitoring traffic patterns or investigating lateral movement within the subnet.

\## Historical Context

Twelve observations recorded. Recent activity (2026-07-23) indicates:

\- ASN resolution occasionally returns null

\- Geographic signals show inconsistency between GB and UA

\- DNSSEC validation confirmed (true)

\- Two DNSBL listings observed with high-severity classifications

\## Recommended Actions

Based on the moderate risk profile and subnet abuse density:

1. **Monitor:** Maintain passive monitoring on 176.103.3.0/24, particularly 176.103.3.3

2. **Block:** Consider blocking 176.103.3.3 at perimeter if traffic patterns indicate exploitation

3. **Observe:** Monitor 176.103.3.249 for service opening or DNS changes

4. **Review:** Investigate geographic inconsistencies if traffic claims UK origin but exhibits Ukrainian characteristics

\## Conclusion

IP 176.103.3.249 represents a low-to-moderate risk infrastructure endpoint with no current active threats. The subnet contains one high-risk neighbor warranting continued surveillance. No immediate blocking is recommended, but maintain awareness of subnet-wide activity patterns.

## Nearby addresses

- 176.103.3.3 (https://ipdebrief.com/176.103.3.3)
- 176.103.3.5 (https://ipdebrief.com/176.103.3.5)
- 176.103.3.8 (https://ipdebrief.com/176.103.3.8)
- 176.103.3.9 (https://ipdebrief.com/176.103.3.9)
- 176.103.3.15 (https://ipdebrief.com/176.103.3.15)
- 176.103.3.17 (https://ipdebrief.com/176.103.3.17)
- 176.103.3.19 (https://ipdebrief.com/176.103.3.19)
- 176.103.3.20 (https://ipdebrief.com/176.103.3.20)
- 176.103.3.21 (https://ipdebrief.com/176.103.3.21)
- 176.103.3.27 (https://ipdebrief.com/176.103.3.27)
- 176.103.3.30 (https://ipdebrief.com/176.103.3.30)
- 176.103.3.31 (https://ipdebrief.com/176.103.3.31)

---

Source: IPDebrief, "176.103.3.249 IP intelligence", https://ipdebrief.com/176.103.3.249, updated 2026-10-06. Assessments are probabilistic.