# 185.132.186.68 — IP Intelligence Summary

185.132.186.68 is an IPv4 address operated by es-digitalrm-1-mnt (AS206092), geolocated to London, United Kingdom. As of October 7, 2026, IPDebrief rates it Low Risk (25/100); no anonymizing service was detected.

- Canonical page: https://ipdebrief.com/185.132.186.68
- Last updated: 2026-10-07

## Ownership

- Organization: es-digitalrm-1-mnt
- Network name: ZA-IPXO-DRM-20220602
- Allocated block: 185.132.186.0/24
- ASN: AS206092 (https://ipdebrief.com/asn/206092)
- Regional registry: RIPE

## Location

- City: London
- Region: Gauteng
- Country: United Kingdom
- Time zone: Europe/London

## Network classification

- Infrastructure type: —
- Datacenter / hosting: no
- Residential: no
- Mobile: no
- Anycast: no
- Tor exit node: no
- VPN: no
- Proxy: no

## Risk assessment

- Assessment: Low Risk (25/100)
- Blocklist listings: 0
- Suspicious activity indicators: no
- Spam source: no

## Analyst narrative

\# IP INTELLIGENCE BRIEFING

**Target IP:** 185.132.186.68/32

**Report Date:** Current

**Classification:** Moderate Risk

**Assigned Risk Score:** 50/100

\---

\## EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

The IP address 185.132.186.68 presents a moderate-risk profile with no active threat indicators. The address belongs to a residential/corporate network block with minimal abuse density and no known malicious campaign associations. Geographic data shows conflicting signals between UK and South Africa, suggesting potential routing anomalies or data inconsistency requiring validation.

\---

\## OWNERSHIP AND NETWORK ATTRIBUTES

\- **ASN:** 206092

\- **Organization:** es-digitalrm-1-mnt

\- **Network Name:** ZA-IPXO-DRM-20220602

\- **CIDR Block:** 185.132.186.0/24

\- **RIR:** RIPE

\- **Network Type:** Firewalled / No Services

The subnet contains 79 sibling IPs with a risk distribution of 10 medium-risk and 69 low-risk addresses. No high-risk neighbors were identified. Overall subnet abuse density is minimal (0).

\---

\## GEOSPATIAL ANALYSIS

Geolocation data presents conflicting signals:

\- **Profile Data:** London, GB (Europe/London timezone)

\- **Historical Signal (0.70 confidence):** Johannesburg, Gauteng, South Africa

\- **Historical Signal (0.95 confidence):** Country code ZA (South Africa)

This geographic inconsistency warrants attention during incident investigation. The address has no valid DNS PTR records and shows no forward DNS resolution.

\---

\## THREAT INDICATORS

\- **Blacklist Status:** Listed on 2 of 8 DNSBLs

\- **Known Attacker:** No

\- **Tor Exit Node:** No

\- **Spam Source:** No

\- **Campaign Associations:** None detected

\- **Threat Persistence:** 0 days observed

\- **Ownership Changes:** 0 recorded

The IP shows no evidence of being used in known malicious campaigns or as part of botnet infrastructure.

\---

\## NETWORK SERVICES AND FINGERPRINTING

\- **Open Ports:** None detected

\- **TLS Certificate:** Not present

\- **HTTP Title:** Not detected

\- **Banner Grabbing:** No server banners observed

\- **Fingerprinting:** No identifiable web server characteristics

The address appears to be firewalled with no publicly accessible services.

\---

\## TEMPORAL BEHAVIOR

\- **Threat Observation Count:** 0

\- **Threat Persistence Days:** 0

\- **Is Persistently Malicious:** No

\- **Ownership Changes:** 0

\- **Route Changes (30d):** 0

\- **Route Stability:** Unstable

The IP shows no evidence of persistent malicious activity over time.

\---

\## SECURITY RECOMMENDATIONS

1. **Monitor geolocation inconsistencies** between profile and historical data

2. **Validate DNSBL listings** to determine false positive risk

3. **Apply standard residential/corporate network filtering** given the firewalled status

4. **No immediate blocking recommended** based on current risk profile

5. **Include in watchlist** for future threat intelligence correlation if campaign indicators emerge

\---

**Conclusion:** This IP address represents a moderate-risk residential/corporate endpoint with no active threat indicators. The primary concern is the geolocation data inconsistency, which should be validated during incident response. No immediate defensive action is required beyond standard network segmentation practices.

## Nearby addresses

- 185.132.186.1 (https://ipdebrief.com/185.132.186.1)
- 185.132.186.3 (https://ipdebrief.com/185.132.186.3)
- 185.132.186.5 (https://ipdebrief.com/185.132.186.5)
- 185.132.186.6 (https://ipdebrief.com/185.132.186.6)
- 185.132.186.8 (https://ipdebrief.com/185.132.186.8)
- 185.132.186.10 (https://ipdebrief.com/185.132.186.10)
- 185.132.186.12 (https://ipdebrief.com/185.132.186.12)
- 185.132.186.13 (https://ipdebrief.com/185.132.186.13)
- 185.132.186.15 (https://ipdebrief.com/185.132.186.15)
- 185.132.186.16 (https://ipdebrief.com/185.132.186.16)
- 185.132.186.18 (https://ipdebrief.com/185.132.186.18)
- 185.132.186.19 (https://ipdebrief.com/185.132.186.19)

---

Source: IPDebrief, "185.132.186.68 IP intelligence", https://ipdebrief.com/185.132.186.68, updated 2026-10-07. Assessments are probabilistic.