# 45.162.21.190 — IP Intelligence Summary

45.162.21.190 is an IPv4 address operated by ELDA SALERNO(FULLNET) (AS267690), geolocated to Cabildo, Argentina. As of October 21, 2026, IPDebrief rates it High Risk (80/100); no anonymizing service was detected.

- Canonical page: https://ipdebrief.com/45.162.21.190
- Last updated: 2026-10-21

## Ownership

- Organization: ELDA SALERNO(FULLNET)
- Network name: 45.162.20.0 - 45.162.21.255
- Allocated block: 45.162.20.0/23
- ASN: AS267690 (https://ipdebrief.com/asn/267690)
- Regional registry: ARIN

## Location

- City: Cabildo
- Region: Buenos Aires
- Country: Argentina
- Time zone: —

## Network classification

- Infrastructure type: —
- Datacenter / hosting: no
- Residential: no
- Mobile: no
- Anycast: no
- Tor exit node: no
- VPN: no
- Proxy: no

## Risk assessment

- Assessment: High Risk (80/100)
- Blocklist listings: 0
- Suspicious activity indicators: no
- Spam source: no

## Exposed services

- 80/tcp — http

## Analyst narrative

\# IP Intelligence Briefing: 45.162.21.190

\## Executive Summary

IP 45.162.21.190 is classified as **MODERATE RISK** (risk score: 45) with no persistent malicious behavior observed. The address belongs to ELDA SALERNO (FULLNET), ASN 267690, operating from a /23 block (45.162.20.0 - 45.162.21.255) geolocated to Argentina (AR). While the IP shows no direct threat indicators, the subnet exhibits elevated risk characteristics with multiple high-risk siblings.

\## Ownership and Network Classification

\- **Organization:** ELDA SALERNO (FULLNET)

\- **ASN:** 267690

\- **CIDR Block:** 45.162.20.0/23

\- **Geolocation:** Argentina, Buenos Aires region, Cabildo

\- **Network Role:** Single-Service Host

\- **Provider Classification:** Not CDN, Cloud, VPN, Proxy, or Hosting infrastructure

\## Threat Profile

\- **Risk Score:** 45 (Moderate)

\- **Abuse Confidence Score:** Not available

\- **Blacklist Count:** 0

\- **Tor Exit Node:** No

\- **Known Attacker:** No

\- **Spam Source:** No

\- **Threat Persistence Days:** 0

\- **Known Campaigns:** None

\### DNSBL Status

The IP is listed on 3 of 8 DNSBLs, indicating some reputation friction despite lack of direct threat indicators.

\## Neighborhood Analysis

The /24 subnet (45.162.21.0/24) contains 37 sibling IPs with the following risk distribution:

\- **High Risk (≥50):** 0 siblings

\- **Medium Risk (25-49):** 23 siblings

\- **Low Risk (0-24):** 13 siblings

**Notable High-Risk Siblings:**

| IP Address | Risk Score |

|------------|------------|

| 45.162.21.195 | 70 |

| 45.162.21.201 | 70 |

| 45.162.21.202 | 70 |

The subnet abuse density is 0% but shows 5 identified threat siblings, suggesting potential infrastructure sharing or coordinated operations.

\## Observed Services

\- **Open Port:** TCP/80 (HTTP)

\- **Forward Resolution:** Not confirmed

\- **DNS Records:** No PTR or A records resolved

\- **TLS Certificate:** None observed

\## Behavioral History

Analysis of 17 observation signals indicates:

\- No ownership changes detected

\- No persistent malicious behavior

\- Route stability: Unstable (isRouteStable: false)

\- Recent activity: 2026-07-28 (17 observations)

\- Threat observation count: 0

\## Recommended Actions

Based on risk profile, the following firewall rules are recommended:

**iptables:**

\`\`\`bash

iptables -A INPUT -s 45.162.21.190 -j DROP

\`\`\`

**nftables:**

\`\`\`bash

nft add rule inet filter input ip saddr 45.162.21.190 drop

\`\`\`

**AWS WAF:**

\`\`\`json

{

"Addresses": \["45.162.21.190/32"\],

"Description": "IPDebrief risk 45"

}

\`\`\`

**Cloudflare WAF:**

\`\`\`json

{

"description": "Block 45.162.21.190 — IPDebrief risk score 45",

"action": "block",

"filter": {

"expression": "ip.src eq 45.162.21.190"

}

}

\`\`\`

\## Intelligence Notes for SOC Analysts

\- Monitor subnet 45.162.21.0/24 for correlated activity; 23 medium-risk siblings may indicate infrastructure sharing

\- Route instability (isRouteStable: false) may indicate hosting or proxy services despite classification

\- 3 DNSBL listings warrant attention during threat correlation

\- No direct threat indicators; monitor for behavioral changes over time

\- Consider blocking at perimeter if internal policy requires risk score ≥40

\---

*Report generated: 2026-07-28*

*Data Source: IPDebrief Intelligence Platform*

## Nearby addresses

- 45.162.21.2 (https://ipdebrief.com/45.162.21.2)
- 45.162.21.16 (https://ipdebrief.com/45.162.21.16)
- 45.162.21.23 (https://ipdebrief.com/45.162.21.23)
- 45.162.21.24 (https://ipdebrief.com/45.162.21.24)
- 45.162.21.28 (https://ipdebrief.com/45.162.21.28)
- 45.162.21.29 (https://ipdebrief.com/45.162.21.29)
- 45.162.21.41 (https://ipdebrief.com/45.162.21.41)
- 45.162.21.44 (https://ipdebrief.com/45.162.21.44)
- 45.162.21.46 (https://ipdebrief.com/45.162.21.46)
- 45.162.21.64 (https://ipdebrief.com/45.162.21.64)
- 45.162.21.65 (https://ipdebrief.com/45.162.21.65)
- 45.162.21.73 (https://ipdebrief.com/45.162.21.73)

---

Source: IPDebrief, "45.162.21.190 IP intelligence", https://ipdebrief.com/45.162.21.190, updated 2026-10-21. Assessments are probabilistic.