# 82.118.29.247 — IP Intelligence Summary

82.118.29.247 is an IPv4 address operated by Internet Utilities Abuse Contact (AS206092), geolocated to Stockholm, Sweden. As of August 29, 2026, IPDebrief rates it Low Risk (25/100); no anonymizing service was detected.

- Canonical page: https://ipdebrief.com/82.118.29.247
- Last updated: 2026-08-29

## Ownership

- Organization: Internet Utilities Abuse Contact
- Network name: IPXO-MNT
- Allocated block: 82.118.29.0/24
- ASN: AS206092 (https://ipdebrief.com/asn/206092)
- Regional registry: RIPE

## Location

- City: Stockholm
- Region: Stockholm County
- Country: Sweden
- Time zone: Europe/Stockholm

## Network classification

- Infrastructure type: —
- Datacenter / hosting: no
- Residential: no
- Mobile: no
- Anycast: no
- Tor exit node: no
- VPN: no
- Proxy: no

## Risk assessment

- Assessment: Low Risk (25/100)
- Blocklist listings: 0
- Suspicious activity indicators: no
- Spam source: no

## Analyst narrative

\# IPDEBRIEF INTELLIGENCE BRIEFING

**Target:** 82.118.29.247/32

**Classification:** LOW RISK / CLEAN

**Date:** 2026-07-24

\---

\## EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

IP 82.118.29.247 presents as a low-risk address with minimal threat indicators. The address is associated with RIPE registry allocation (ASN 206092) under "Internet Utilities Abuse Contact" organization. Current risk scoring indicates no active malicious activity, with zero blacklist listings and no observable threat campaigns. The /24 subnet demonstrates clean classification with 0.0329 abuse density.

\---

\## RISK PROFILE

| Metric | Value |

|--------|-------|

| **Overall Risk Score** | 0 (Low Risk) |

| **Provider Score** | 0 |

| **Authority Score** | 0 |

| **Stability Score** | 0 |

| **Abuse Confidence** | Null |

| **Blacklist Count** | 0 |

**Risk Breakdown:** No active threat indicators detected. Address not classified as known attacker, spam source, or Tor exit node.

\---

\## NETWORK ATTRIBUTES

| Attribute | Value |

|-----------|-------|

| **ASN** | 206092 |

| **Organization** | Internet Utilities Abuse Contact |

| **Netname** | IPXO-MNT |

| **RIR** | RIPE |

| **CIDR Block** | 82.118.29.0/24 |

| **Network Classification** | Clean |

| **Subnet Status** | Route unstable |

**Control Plane:** DNSSEC valid. No MOAS (Multiple Origin ASN Source) behavior detected.

\---

\## GEOLOCATION ANALYSIS

**Current Report:** US (New York, NY)

**Historical Data:** Stockholm, Sweden (multiple observations)

**Validation Status:** GEOCONFLICT DETECTED – Geolocation sources disagree. Two geolocation sources reported inconsistent country codes (US vs SE). This warrants monitoring but does not indicate malicious activity.

\---

\## NETWORK SERVICES

| Service Type | Status |

|--------------|--------|

| **Open Ports** | None detected |

| **TLS Certificate** | None |

| **HTTP Title** | None |

| **Service Classification** | Firewalled / No Services |

No active services detected on the target IP address.

\---

\## THREAT INDICATORS

| Indicator | Status |

|-----------|--------|

| **Known Campaigns** | None |

| **Threat Feeds** | None |

| **WAF Violations** | 0 |

| **Honeypot Hits** | 0 |

| **Enumeration Strikes** | 0 |

**Campaign Correlation:** No associated campaigns or correlated IPs identified.

\---

\## NEIGHBORHOOD ANALYSIS

**Subnet:** 82.118.29.0/24

**Total Siblings:** 152 IPs

**Active Siblings:** 8

**Threat Siblings:** 5

**Abuse Density:** 0.0329 (Low)

**Risk Distribution in /24:**

\- High Risk: 0

\- Medium Risk: 0

\- Low Risk: 100

The target IP resides in a clean subnet with minimal threat presence. Neighbor analysis shows the majority of adjacent addresses maintain low-risk classifications.

\---

\## OBSERVATION HISTORY

**Total Observations:** 12 signals tracked

Recent activity includes consistent reporting of:

\- ASN 206092 / RIPE registry

\- Organization: Internet Utilities Abuse Contact

\- Abuse email: report@abuseradar.com

\- Stable abuse density reporting (0.0329)

**Temporal Analysis:** No persistent malicious behavior detected. Threat observation count: 0.

\---

\## RELATIONSHIPS

| Type | Target |

|------|--------|

| Same Network | IPXO-MNT |

Only one network-level relationship identified.

\---

\## RECOMMENDED ACTIONS

Based on current risk profile, the following actions are recommended:

1. **Allow Traffic:** No blocking required based on current threat assessment

2. **Monitor Geo Discrepancy:** Investigate US vs Sweden geolocation inconsistency through RDAP

3. **Route Stability:** Monitor for route changes given current "route unstable" status

4. **Baseline Establishment:** Document current clean state for future comparison

**Firewall Rule:** No restrictive rules required. Standard perimeter security applies.

\---

\## INTELLIGENCE JUDGMENT

**Assessment:** BENIGN

IP 82.118.29.247 demonstrates no malicious characteristics. The geolocation inconsistency represents a data quality issue rather than adversarial activity. The address maintains a clean security posture with no observed threat indicators, blacklist listings, or malicious campaign associations.

**SOC Action:** Monitor for changes in geolocation reporting and route stability. No immediate remediation required.

\---

*Report generated via IPDebrief Intelligence Platform. Data sourced from authoritative threat intelligence feeds.*

## Nearby addresses

- 82.118.29.2 (https://ipdebrief.com/82.118.29.2)
- 82.118.29.5 (https://ipdebrief.com/82.118.29.5)
- 82.118.29.8 (https://ipdebrief.com/82.118.29.8)
- 82.118.29.9 (https://ipdebrief.com/82.118.29.9)
- 82.118.29.13 (https://ipdebrief.com/82.118.29.13)
- 82.118.29.15 (https://ipdebrief.com/82.118.29.15)
- 82.118.29.16 (https://ipdebrief.com/82.118.29.16)
- 82.118.29.19 (https://ipdebrief.com/82.118.29.19)
- 82.118.29.20 (https://ipdebrief.com/82.118.29.20)
- 82.118.29.21 (https://ipdebrief.com/82.118.29.21)
- 82.118.29.26 (https://ipdebrief.com/82.118.29.26)
- 82.118.29.34 (https://ipdebrief.com/82.118.29.34)

---

Source: IPDebrief, "82.118.29.247 IP intelligence", https://ipdebrief.com/82.118.29.247, updated 2026-08-29. Assessments are probabilistic.
