# 84.233.212.69 — IP Intelligence Summary

84.233.212.69 is an IPv4 address operated by AS3257-IPAM-MNT (AS212238), geolocated to San Jose, United States. Its reverse DNS name is unn-84-233-212-69.datapacket.com. As of September 1, 2026, IPDebrief rates it Low Risk (20/100); no anonymizing service was detected.

- Canonical page: https://ipdebrief.com/84.233.212.69
- Last updated: 2026-09-01

## Ownership

- Organization: AS3257-IPAM-MNT
- Network name: CDNEXT-SJC
- Allocated block: 84.233.212.0/24
- ASN: AS212238 (https://ipdebrief.com/asn/212238)
- Regional registry: RIPE

## Location

- City: San Jose
- Region: California
- Country: United States
- Time zone: —

## Network classification

- Infrastructure type: —
- Datacenter / hosting: no
- Residential: no
- Mobile: no
- Anycast: no
- Tor exit node: no
- VPN: no
- Proxy: no

## Risk assessment

- Assessment: Low Risk (20/100)
- Blocklist listings: 0
- Suspicious activity indicators: no
- Spam source: no

## Reverse DNS

- unn-84-233-212-69.datapacket.com
- Forward-confirmed: no

## Exposed services

- 8443/tcp — https-alt

## Analyst narrative

\# IP Intelligence Briefing: 84.233.212.69

\## Executive Summary

IP address 84.233.212.69 presents as a low-risk infrastructure host within the CDNEXT-SJC network infrastructure. Current risk scoring indicates minimal threat presence, though geolocation validation anomalies and limited blacklist associations warrant monitoring.

\## Network Identification

\- **IP Address:** 84.233.212.69/32

\- **ASN:** 212238 (AS3257-IPAM-MNT)

\- **Organization:** CDNEXT-SJC

\- **CIDR Block:** 84.233.212.0/24

\- **RIR:** RIPE

\- **DNS Resolved:** unn-84-233-212-69.datapacket.com (datapacket.com)

\- **Geolocation:** US, California, San Jose (geo-validation flagged as implausible)

\## Risk Profile

\- **Overall Risk Score:** 20/100 (Low Risk)

\- **Abuse Confidence Score:** Not available

\- **Threat Classification:** Not categorized as known attacker, spam source, or Tor exit node

\- **Blacklist Status:** Listed on 1 of 8 threat feed sources (medium severity)

\- **Network Role:** Single-Service Host

\- **Infrastructure Flags:** Not cloud, CDN, VPN, proxy, hosting, mobile, or residential

\## Technical Observations

\- **Open Ports:** 8443/TCP (HTTPS-alt)

\- **TLS Configuration:** No certificate detected

\- **HTTP Services:** No active HTTP title or server banner

\- **Email Reputation:** SPF and DMARC records present; no sender score available

\- **Control Plane:** Route changes observed (non-stable route); DNSSEC valid

\## Neighborhood Analysis

\- **Subnet:** 84.233.212.0/24

\- **Abuse Density:** 0.0 (Low)

\- **Neighbor Risk Distribution:** 0 high-risk, 1 medium-risk, 2 low-risk

\- **Notable Neighbors:**

\- 84.233.212.3 (Risk: 25, Authority: 50)

\- 84.233.212.6 (Risk: 25, Authority: 50)

\- 84.233.212.77 (Risk: 40, Authority: 50)

\- 84.233.212.79 (Risk: null, Authority: null)

\## Temporal Observations

\- **Observation Count:** 20 signals recorded

\- **Threat Observation Count:** 1

\- **Threat Persistence:** Not persistently malicious

\- **Ownership Stability:** No ownership changes detected

\## Key Anomalies

1. **Geolocation Implausibility:** RTT measurement (88.4ms average) inconsistent with claimed San Jose location (requires minimum 177.2ms for 8860km distance)

2. **DNSBL Association:** Single medium-severity listing among 8 total lists

3. **Port Exposure:** Port 8443 open with HTTPS-alt service but no TLS certificate

\## Intelligence Assessment

This IP represents infrastructure within a legitimate network provider environment (CDNEXT-SJC). The low risk score combined with minimal abuse activity in the neighborhood suggests benign operational use. The geolocation validation failure and single DNSBL listing are notable but do not indicate active malicious behavior. No evidence of association with known campaigns or correlated threat infrastructure.

\## Recommended Actions

\- **Monitoring:** Continue passive observation; no immediate blocking recommended

\- **Validation:** Verify actual geographic location if traffic patterns suggest anomaly

\- **Context:** Monitor for changes in port 8443 service configuration or TLS certificate deployment

\---

*Intel prepared for SOC operations. Data sourced from IPDebrief intelligence platform.*

## Nearby addresses

- 84.233.212.3 (https://ipdebrief.com/84.233.212.3)
- 84.233.212.6 (https://ipdebrief.com/84.233.212.6)
- 84.233.212.20 (https://ipdebrief.com/84.233.212.20)
- 84.233.212.41 (https://ipdebrief.com/84.233.212.41)
- 84.233.212.67 (https://ipdebrief.com/84.233.212.67)
- 84.233.212.72 (https://ipdebrief.com/84.233.212.72)
- 84.233.212.74 (https://ipdebrief.com/84.233.212.74)
- 84.233.212.77 (https://ipdebrief.com/84.233.212.77)
- 84.233.212.79 (https://ipdebrief.com/84.233.212.79)
- 84.233.212.99 (https://ipdebrief.com/84.233.212.99)

---

Source: IPDebrief, "84.233.212.69 IP intelligence", https://ipdebrief.com/84.233.212.69, updated 2026-09-01. Assessments are probabilistic.