1.212.225.99
IP Intelligence Dossier
Your IP: 216.73.216.123
🤖 Witness AIThis summary was generated by AI and may contain inaccuracies. Verify critical details independently.
IP Intelligence Briefing: 1.212.225.99
Date: June 16, 2026
---
**1. Core Profile**
- Risk Score: 80 (High Risk)
- Ownership: Registered to IP Manager (ASN 3786, BORANET-KR).
- Geolocation: South Korea (Gyeonggi-do, Anyang-si), coordinates 35.91°N, 127.77°E.
- Network Role: Single-service host (SSH on port 22).
- Threat Indicators: No direct malicious activity detected.
---
**2. Observational History**
- Latest Scan (June 10): SSH service active (OpenSSH 7.4). No TLS certificates or HTTP banners.
- Geolocation Validation (June 16): Plausible, 8,482 km from probe, 219 ms avg RTT.
- Network Stability: BGP prefix 1.208.0.0/12 shows unstable routing (routeChanges30d = 0, isRouteStable = false).
---
**3. Relationships & Subnet**
- Network Affiliation: Subnet 1.212.225.99/24 with abuse density 1 (mostly clean).
- Related Entities: Linked to BORANET-KR (APNIC-registed network).
- Neighbor Analysis: No active siblings in subnet; no neighboring IPs found.
---
**4. Risk & Mitigation**
- Threat Context: No direct malicious indicators, but high-risk score may stem from network provider (IP Manager) or subnet abuse density.
- Recommendations:
- Monitor SSH traffic for anomalies.
- Consider blocking this IP if not required, given its high-risk profile.
- Validate DNSSEC and BGP route stability for network resilience.
---
Next Steps:
- Investigate BORANET-KR for potential provider risks.
- Continuously monitor SSH service for unauthorized access attempts.
- Cross-reference with DNSBL lists (7 entries in DNSBL listings).
Source: IPDebrief Threat Intelligence Platform.
This summary was generated by AI and may contain inaccuracies. Verify critical details independently.
🏢 Ownership & Registration
| Organization | IP Manager |
| ASN | AS3786 |
| Network Name | BORANET-KR |
| CIDR Block | 1.208.0.0/12 |
| RIR | APNIC |
| Country | KR |
| Abuse Contact | Available via RDAP |
🌐 DNS Intelligence
| PTR Record | No PTR |
| Forward Confirmed | No — PTR hostname does not resolve back to this IP (weak signal) |
🔐 DNS Hygiene
| Hygiene Score | 20% (Poor) |
| SPF | Not configured |
| DMARC | Not configured |
| FCrDNS | Not verified |
| DNSSEC | Valid |
| CAA | Not configured |
☁️ Network Classification
| Infrastructure | Unknown |
| Service Purpose | Single-Service Host |
| Network Tier | Tier 3 — Basic operator with some routing infrastructure |
🔌 Services & Open Ports
| Port | Service | Protocol | Banner |
|---|---|---|---|
| 22 | ssh | tcp | |
| Closed Ports | 25, 80, 443, 3389, 8080, 8443 (1 open / 7 scanned) | ||
| Server | — |
| HTTP Title | — |
| SSH Version | SSH-2.0-OpenSSH_7.4 |
🔐 TLS Certificate
No certificate
Issued by —
N/A
| SANs | None |
| Valid From | — |
| Valid Until | — |
🎯 Confidence Breakdown
Per-dimension confidence scores based on source diversity and data freshness
| Dimension | Score | Sources | Observations |
|---|---|---|---|
| threat | 33% | 2 | 4 |
| routing | 22% | 3 | 3 |
| services | 15% | 2 | 2 |
| ownership | 27% | 2 | 3 |
| reputation | 26% | 1 | 3 |
| geolocation | 32% | 2 | 3 |
| Overall | 26% | 12 | 18 |
Coverage: 6/6 dimensions · Data sufficiency: sufficient
| Data Coherence | Consistent (100%) |
| Attribution | Moderate (65%) |
| OwnershipFCrDNSGeo ConsensusGeo PlausibleIRR MatchRPKI Valid |
📅 Observation Timeline 🔄 Recent
| First Seen | 2026-05-07 23:03:23 UTC |
| Last Seen | 2026-06-26 18:10:08 UTC |
| Profile Built | 2026-06-25 14:01:33 UTC |
| Data Freshness | Recent |
| Signal Types | 23 |
| Total Observations | 23 |
🔍 23 signal types · 23 observations collected
This report is generated from 23+ independent intelligence signals including
ownership records, DNS analysis, BGP routing, TLS certificates, port scanning, threat feeds,
behavioral fingerprinting, and more.
Full dossier details are available via our API.
Full dossier details are available via our API.
ℹ️ About This Report
All data shown is publicly available network metadata — IP addresses do not reliably identify individuals.
Assessments are probabilistic and should not be used as sole basis for access control decisions.
To report an issue or request data review, contact admin@ipdebrief.com.