102.129.63.66
IP Intelligence Dossier
Your IP: 216.73.216.123
π€ Witness AIThis summary was generated by AI and may contain inaccuracies. Verify critical details independently.
IP Intelligence Briefing: 102.129.63.66
*Generated using IPDebrief tools*
---
**1. Core Profile**
- Risk Score: 40 (Moderate Risk)
- Ownership: Registered to Jacobus De Beer (ASN 327991, Megasurf Wireless Internet CC).
- Geolocation: Vanderbijlpark, South Africa (ZA).
- Threat Indicators: No direct malicious indicators (no blacklists, spam, or known attacker associations).
- Network Role: Firewalled / No Services (no open ports, TLS, or HTTP activity).
- DNS: Resolves to ms-63-66.megasurf.co.za (valid domain, SPF/DKIM records present).
---
**2. Network Context**
- Subnet: 102.129.63.0/24
- Abuse Density: 20.5% (moderate risk).
- High-Risk Neighbors:
- 102.129.63.24 (Risk: 80), 102.129.63.80 (Risk: 80), 102.129.63.206 (Risk: 55).
- Subnet Classification: Mixed (combination of low/medium/high risk IPs).
---
**3. Historical Observations**
- Latest Risk Signal: Moderate risk (score 40) as of 2026-06-06.
- BGP Stability: Route stable over 30 days; no recent changes.
- DNSSEC Validity: Confirmed.
- Threat Persistence: No persistent malicious activity detected.
---
**4. Relationships**
- DNS Associations: Linked to ms-63-66.megasurf.co.za.
- Network Relationships: Same subnet (102.129.63.0/24).
- Organizational Ties: Owned by Megasurf Wireless (South Africa).
---
**5. Actionable Insights**
- Monitor Subnet: The 102.129.63.0/24 subnet contains high-risk neighbors; investigate potential lateral movement or compromised hosts.
- Validate DNS: Confirm legitimacy of ms-63-66.megasurf.co.za and ensure no DNS hijacking.
- Network Segmentation: Consider isolating this subnet if it hosts critical assets, given the mixed risk profile.
- Threat Correlation: Cross-reference with other IPs in the subnet (e.g., 102.129.63.24, 102.129.63.80) for potentialε ³θ.
---
**6. Summary**
The IP 102.129.63.66 is part of a South African network with moderate risk, no direct malicious indicators, but resides in a subnet with notable high-risk neighbors. While the IP itself appears legitimate, the subnetβs abuse density warrants closer monitoring. SOC teams should prioritize validating DNS records and assessing network segmentation to mitigate potential risks.
This summary was generated by AI and may contain inaccuracies. Verify critical details independently.
π’ Ownership & Registration
| Organization | Jacobus De Beer |
| ASN | AS327991 |
| Network Name | 102.129.63.0 - 102.129.63.255 |
| CIDR Block | 102.129.63.0/24 |
| RIR | AFRINIC |
| Country | ZA |
| Abuse Contact | β |
π DNS Intelligence
| PTR | ms-63-66.megasurf.co.za |
| Forward Confirmed | Yes β FCrDNS verified |
| Forward Hostnames | ms-63-66.megasurf.co.za |
π DNS Hygiene
| Hygiene Score | 80% (Excellent) |
| SPF | Present |
| DMARC | Present |
| FCrDNS | Verified |
| DNSSEC | Valid |
| CAA | Not configured |
βοΈ Network Classification
| Infrastructure | Unknown |
| Service Purpose | Firewalled / No Services |
| Network Tier | Tier 3 β Basic operator with some routing infrastructure |
π Services & Open Ports
| Port | Service | Protocol | Banner |
|---|---|---|---|
| No open ports detected | |||
| Server | β |
| HTTP Title | β |
π TLS Certificate
No certificate
Issued by β
N/A
| SANs | None |
| Valid From | β |
| Valid Until | β |
π― Confidence Breakdown
Per-dimension confidence scores based on source diversity and data freshness
| Dimension | Score | Sources | Observations |
|---|---|---|---|
| threat | 27% | 2 | 3 |
| routing | 27% | 2 | 3 |
| services | 13% | 1 | 1 |
| ownership | 30% | 3 | 3 |
| reputation | 22% | 1 | 3 |
| geolocation | 19% | 2 | 2 |
| Overall | 23% | 11 | 15 |
Coverage: 6/6 dimensions Β· Data sufficiency: sufficient
| Data Coherence | Consistent (100%) |
| Attribution | Moderate (70%) |
| OwnershipFCrDNSGeo ConsensusGeo PlausibleIRR MatchRPKI Valid |
π Observation Timeline π Live
| First Seen | 2026-05-13 06:36:24 UTC |
| Last Seen | 2026-06-06 17:31:21 UTC |
| Profile Built | 2026-06-06 17:43:05 UTC |
| Data Freshness | Live |
| Signal Types | 23 |
| Total Observations | 26 |
π 23 signal types Β· 26 observations collected
This report is generated from 23+ independent intelligence signals including
ownership records, DNS analysis, BGP routing, TLS certificates, port scanning, threat feeds,
behavioral fingerprinting, and more.
Full dossier details are available via our API.
Full dossier details are available via our API.
βΉοΈ About This Report
All data shown is publicly available network metadata β IP addresses do not reliably identify individuals.
Assessments are probabilistic and should not be used as sole basis for access control decisions.
To report an issue or request data review, contact admin@ipdebrief.com.