Your IP: 216.73.216.123
π€ Witness AIThis summary was generated by AI and may contain inaccuracies. Verify critical details independently.
IP Intelligence Briefing: 102.22.112.169
Date: 2026-06-07
---
**1. Risk Profile**
- Risk Score: 70 (High Risk)
- Ownership: Owned by Nico van der Westhuizen (ASN 328257, South Africa).
- Geolocation: Registered to Kleinmond, Western Cape, South Africa (ZA).
- Network Role: Single-service host (HTTP on port 80).
---
**2. Threat Indicators**
- No active threats detected (no malware, spam, or known attacker associations).
- DNS: No verified PTR records or domain associations.
- TLS/HTTPS: No certificate data available.
---
**3. Network Context**
- Subnet: 102.22.112.0/24 (abuse density: 0.5, classified as "mostly clean").
- Neighbors:
- 1 active sibling IP (102.22.112.19) with unknown risk score.
- Subnet shows low abuse density but contains 1 threat sibling.
- BGP: Origin ASN 328257 (ASK Internet Technologies CC), route stability: unstable.
---
**4. Historical Observations**
- Recent Activity (June 2026):
- HTTP service detected (status code 200, no banners).
- DNSSEC valid, no CAA records.
- Listed in 4/8 DNSBLs (moderate risk).
- No persistent malicious behavior observed.
---
**5. Recommendations**
- Monitor: Track HTTP service for unexpected changes (e.g., new banners, TLS certs).
- Investigate: Verify ownership legitimacy, as the IP is registered to a private individual.
- Firewall: Consider blocking the subnet (102.22.112.0/24) if high-risk activity is detected.
- Subnet Analysis: Validate abuse density trends in the 102.22.112.0/24 subnet.
---
Note: No immediate mitigation required, but ongoing monitoring is advised due to the IPβs high-risk score and potential for future threats.
This summary was generated by AI and may contain inaccuracies. Verify critical details independently.
π’ Ownership & Registration
| Organization | Nico van der Westhuizen |
| ASN | AS328257 |
| Network Name | 102.22.112.0 - 102.22.112.255 |
| CIDR Block | 102.22.112.0/24 |
| RIR | AFRINIC |
| Country | ZA |
| Abuse Contact | β |
π DNS Intelligence
| PTR Record | No PTR |
| Forward Confirmed | No β PTR hostname does not resolve back to this IP (weak signal) |
π DNS Hygiene
| Hygiene Score | 20% (Poor) |
| SPF | Not configured |
| DMARC | Not configured |
| FCrDNS | Not verified |
| DNSSEC | Valid |
| CAA | Not configured |
βοΈ Network Classification
| Infrastructure | Unknown |
| Service Purpose | Single-Service Host |
| Network Tier | Unknown β Insufficient routing data to classify |
π Services & Open Ports
| Port | Service | Protocol | Banner |
|---|---|---|---|
| 80 | http | tcp | β |
| Closed Ports | 22, 25, 443, 3389, 8080, 8443 (1 open / 7 scanned) | ||
| Server | β |
| HTTP Title | β |
π TLS Certificate
No certificate
Issued by β
N/A
| SANs | None |
| Valid From | β |
| Valid Until | β |
π― Confidence Breakdown
Per-dimension confidence scores based on source diversity and data freshness
| Dimension | Score | Sources | Observations |
|---|---|---|---|
| threat | 43% | 2 | 5 |
| routing | 13% | 1 | 1 |
| services | 30% | 2 | 3 |
| ownership | 19% | 2 | 2 |
| reputation | 28% | 1 | 3 |
| geolocation | 27% | 2 | 2 |
| Overall | 26% | 10 | 16 |
Coverage: 5/6 dimensions Β· Data sufficiency: partial
| Data Coherence | Consistent (100%) |
| Attribution | Moderate (50%) |
| OwnershipFCrDNSGeo ConsensusGeo PlausibleIRR MatchRPKI Valid |
π Observation Timeline π Live
| First Seen | 2026-05-14 19:27:26 UTC |
| Last Seen | 2026-06-07 07:09:57 UTC |
| Profile Built | 2026-06-07 07:11:14 UTC |
| Data Freshness | Live |
| Signal Types | 18 |
| Total Observations | 21 |
π 18 signal types Β· 21 observations collected
This report is generated from 18+ independent intelligence signals including
ownership records, DNS analysis, BGP routing, TLS certificates, port scanning, threat feeds,
behavioral fingerprinting, and more.
Full dossier details are available via our API.
Full dossier details are available via our API.
βΉοΈ About This Report
All data shown is publicly available network metadata β IP addresses do not reliably identify individuals.
Assessments are probabilistic and should not be used as sole basis for access control decisions.
To report an issue or request data review, contact admin@ipdebrief.com.