102.22.112.19
IP Intelligence Briefing: 102.22.112.19
Date: 2026-06-13
---
**Risk Profile**
- Overall Risk: Low (25/100)
- Provider Score: 0 (No identifiable ISP)
- Authority Score: 0 (No authoritative ownership data)
- Stability: Minimal (0.13)
- Threat Indicators: No malicious activity detected (no blacklists, campaigns, or known attackers).
---
**Network & Ownership**
- Geolocation: Unresolved (no country, city, or coordinates).
- ASN: 328257 (ASK Internet Technologies CC, South Africa).
- Subnet: 102.22.112.0/21 (shared with 102.22.112.169).
- Control Plane:
- BGP prefix: 102.22.112.0/21
- DNSSEC valid, but listed in 1 DNSBL (potential spam/abuse risk).
- No TLS services, no open ports, and no HTTP server banners.
---
**Observation History**
- Recent Activity:
- Minimal DNS observations (1 signal).
- No persistent threats or ownership changes.
- One DNSBL listing (low severity).
- Trend: Stable with no escalation in risk scores.
---
**Neighbor Analysis**
- Subnet: 102.22.112.0/24 (102.22.112.19/32).
- Neighbors:
- 102.22.112.169: Risk score 70 (Medium Risk).
- Abuse Density: 0% (low risk in subnet).
---
**Relationships**
- No linked entities: No subnets, hostnames, or organizations associated.
---
**Actionable Insights**
1. Monitor Subnet: The neighbor (102.22.112.169) has a higher risk score. Investigate potential compromise or botnet activity in the 102.22.112.0/24 subnet.
2. DNSBL Check: Verify the DNSBL listing for 102.22.112.19. Confirm if it’s a false positive or part of a broader abuse pattern.
3. Geolocation Gap: Use passive DNS or WHOIS tools to resolve the missing geolocation data.
4. Firewall Rules: Consider allowing traffic to this IP unless further threats are identified.
---
Conclusion: 102.22.112.19 appears benign, but its subnet contains a medium-risk neighbor. Prioritize monitoring the subnet and validating DNSBL alerts.
This summary was generated by AI and may contain inaccuracies. Verify critical details independently.
🏢 Ownership & Registration
| Organization | Nico van der Westhuizen |
| ASN | AS328257 |
| Network Name | 102.22.112.0 - 102.22.112.255 |
| CIDR Block | 102.22.112.0/24 |
| RIR | AFRINIC |
| Country | ZA |
| Abuse Contact | — |
🌐 DNS Intelligence
| PTR Record | No PTR |
| Forward Confirmed | No — PTR hostname does not resolve back to this IP (weak signal) |
🔐 DNS Hygiene
| Hygiene Score | 20% (Poor) |
| SPF | Not configured |
| DMARC | Not configured |
| FCrDNS | Not verified |
| DNSSEC | Valid |
| CAA | Not configured |
☁️ Network Classification
| Infrastructure | Unknown |
| Service Purpose | Firewalled / No Services |
| Network Tier | Unknown — Insufficient routing data to classify |
🔌 Services & Open Ports
| Port | Service | Protocol | Banner |
|---|---|---|---|
| No open ports detected | |||
| Server | — |
| HTTP Title | — |
🔐 TLS Certificate
| SANs | None |
| Valid From | — |
| Valid Until | — |
🎯 Confidence Breakdown
Per-dimension confidence scores based on source diversity and data freshness
| Dimension | Score | Sources | Observations |
|---|---|---|---|
| threat | 25% | 1 | 1 |
| routing | 25% | 1 | 1 |
| services | 25% | 1 | 1 |
| ownership | 0% | 0 | 0 |
| reputation | 0% | 0 | 0 |
| geolocation | 0% | 0 | 0 |
| Overall | 12% | 3 | 3 |
| Data Coherence | Consistent (100%) |
| Attribution | Moderate (50%) |
| OwnershipFCrDNSGeo ConsensusGeo PlausibleIRR MatchRPKI Valid |
📅 Observation Timeline 🔄 Live
| First Seen | 2026-06-06 19:44:40 UTC |
| Last Seen | 2026-06-13 14:51:36 UTC |
| Profile Built | 2026-06-13 15:01:14 UTC |
| Data Freshness | Live |
| Signal Types | 14 |
| Total Observations | 14 |
Full dossier details are available via our API.