IPDebrief

102.53.15.180

IP Intelligence Dossier
Your IP: 216.73.216.123
{ } JSON ๐Ÿ”ง Full Actions API
๐Ÿค– Witness AIThis summary was generated by AI and may contain inaccuracies. Verify critical details independently.

IP Intelligence Briefing: 102.53.15.180

Date: 2026-06-01

---

**1. Core Profile**

---

**2. Observation History**

- Observed 1 threat signal (abuse density 0.5) in the last 30 days.

- Stability score: 0 (unstable network).

- DNS resolution failures noted (timed-out queries to internal DNS servers).

---

**3. Relationships & Network Context**

- Same network: 102.52.0.0/14 (Maroc Telecom).

- DNS associations failed (repeated timeouts to internal DNS servers).

- Abuse density: 0.33 (low).

- Neighbors:

- 102.53.15.17 (Risk: 70), 102.53.15.18 (Risk: 70), 102.53.15.56 (Risk: 80).

- Subnet classified as mostly clean, but one neighbor (102.53.15.56) has elevated risk.

---

**4. Threat & Defense Implications**

---

**5. Recommended Actions**

1. Investigate DNS Failures: Verify DNS server health and check for spoofing.

2. Monitor Neighbor IPs: Focus on 102.53.15.56 for unusual traffic patterns.

3. Enhance Network Visibility: Deploy DNS monitoring tools to detect configuration issues.

4. User Context: Correlate with user activity logs if this IP is associated with internal users.

Next Steps: Reassess risk if DNS issues persist or if neighbor IPs show increased activity.

---

*Generated by IPDebrief. Data as of 2026-06-01.*

This summary was generated by AI and may contain inaccuracies. Verify critical details independently.

๐ŸŒ Geolocation

Country๐ŸŒ MA
Region06
CityCasablanca
Timezoneโ€”
Latitude33.59
Longitude-7.62

๐Ÿข Ownership & Registration

OrganizationSEPFS Maroc Telecom
ASNAS6713
Network Name102.52.0.0 - 102.55.255.255
CIDR Block102.52.0.0/14
RIRAFRINIC
CountryMA
Abuse Contactโ€”

๐ŸŒ DNS Intelligence

PTR RecordNo PTR
Forward ConfirmedNo โ€” PTR hostname does not resolve back to this IP (weak signal)

๐Ÿ” DNS Hygiene

Hygiene Score40% (Fair)
SPFNot configured
DMARCNot configured
FCrDNSNot verified
DNSSECValid
CAAPresent

โ˜๏ธ Network Classification

InfrastructureResidential
Service PurposeWeb Server
Network TierEnd-User โ€” Residential ISP endpoint
Residential

๐Ÿ”Œ Services & Open Ports

PortServiceProtocolBanner
80httptcpโ€”
443httpstcpโ€”
22sshtcp
Closed Ports25, 3389, 8080, 8443 (3 open / 7 scanned)
Serverlighttpd/1.4.31
HTTP Titleโ€”
SSH VersionSSH-2.0-OpenSSH_4.3p2 Debian-8ubuntu1.4
โš  Unusual for residential โ€” open services on a home connection may indicate self-hosting, compromise, or misconfigured networking equipment.

๐Ÿ” TLS Certificate

๐Ÿ”’
No certificate
Issued by โ€”
N/A
SANsNone
Valid Fromโ€”
Valid Untilโ€”

๐ŸŽฏ Confidence Breakdown

Per-dimension confidence scores based on source diversity and data freshness

DimensionScoreSourcesObservations
threat
34%
23
routing
22%
33
services
28%
24
ownership
15%
22
reputation
23%
13
geolocation
13%
11
Overall23%1116
Coverage: 6/6 dimensions ยท Data sufficiency: sufficient
Data CoherenceConsistent (100%)
AttributionModerate (50%)
OwnershipFCrDNSGeo ConsensusGeo PlausibleIRR MatchRPKI Valid

๐Ÿ“… Observation Timeline ๐Ÿ”„ Live

First Seen2026-05-07 23:03:24 UTC
Last Seen2026-06-26 18:10:11 UTC
Profile Built2026-06-22 05:55:59 UTC
Data FreshnessLive
Signal Types23
Total Observations26
๐Ÿ” 23 signal types ยท 26 observations collected
This report is generated from 23+ independent intelligence signals including ownership records, DNS analysis, BGP routing, TLS certificates, port scanning, threat feeds, behavioral fingerprinting, and more.
Full dossier details are available via our API.
{ } JSON API ๐Ÿ”ง Actions API ๐Ÿ“ง Enterprise Access

โ„น๏ธ About This Report

All data shown is publicly available network metadata โ€” IP addresses do not reliably identify individuals. Assessments are probabilistic and should not be used as sole basis for access control decisions. To report an issue or request data review, contact admin@ipdebrief.com.