102.64.37.155📋 Copy

# IPDEBRIEF THREAT INTELLIGENCE BRIEFING

Target: 102.64.37.155/32

Date: July 30, 2026

Classification: Moderate Risk

---

## EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

IP 102.64.37.155 presents a moderate risk profile (Score: 55/100) with no active threat indicators. The IP is firewalled with no open services and shows geographic inconsistencies between reported locations. Recommended action is to increase monitoring and logging for this address.

---

## OWNERSHIP & NETWORK ATTRIBUTES

---

## GEOGRAPHIC ANALYSIS

Discrepancy Detected:

• Profile Geolocation: GB (London)
• DNS Domain: co.za (South Africa)
• Historical Signals: ZA (Vanderbijlpark, South Africa)

Assessment: Geographic inconsistency suggests potential misconfiguration or anonymization. The PTR hostname (ms-37-155.megasurf.co.za) and domain registration (.co.za) both indicate South African origin, despite profile reporting UK location.

---

## THREAT INDICATORS

Risk Distribution (Subnet 102.64.37.0/24):

• High Risk IPs: 3
• Medium Risk IPs: 66
• Low Risk IPs: 23
• Subnet Abuse Density: 3.2%

---

## SERVICE & DNS ANALYSIS

• Open Ports: None (Firewalled)
• PTR Hostname: ms-37-155.megasurf.co.za
• DNS Resolution: Forward confirmed (1 hostname)
• Email Authentication: SPF and DMARC present
• HTTP Services: None detected

---

## OBSERVATION HISTORY

Recent Activity: 15 observations recorded through July 30, 2026

• No persistent malicious behavior detected
• Ownership changes: 0
• Threat persistence days: 0
• Threat observation count: 0

---

## SECURITY RECOMMENDATIONS

Firewall Rules (Recommended)

iptables:

```bash

iptables -A INPUT -s 102.64.37.155 -j DROP

```

nftables:

```bash

nft add rule inet filter input ip saddr 102.64.37.155 drop

```

Cloudflare WAF:

```json

{"description":"Block 102.64.37.155 — IPDebrief risk score 55","action":"block","filter":{"expression":"ip.src eq 102.64.37.155"}}

```

AWS WAF:

```json

{"Addresses":["102.64.37.155/32"],"Description":"IPDebrief risk 55"}

```

SOC Actions

1. Increase logging verbosity for traffic from this IP

2. Monitor for any service changes or port opens

3. Correlate with geographic inconsistencies in upstream traffic

---

## RISK ASSESSMENT

Overall Risk: MODERATE (55/100)

Primary Concerns:

• Geographic inconsistency between profile and DNS records
• DNSBL listings (3 of 8)
• Route instability at BGP prefix level

Mitigating Factors:

• No open services (firewalled)
• No active threat indicators
• Low subnet abuse density (3.2%)
• No known attacker associations

Conclusion: This IP represents a moderate monitoring concern due to geographic inconsistencies and DNSBL presence, but lacks active malicious indicators. Implement logging and review traffic patterns; no immediate blocking required unless additional threat indicators emerge.

This summary was generated by AI and may contain inaccuracies. Verify critical details independently.