IPDebrief

102.64.39.126

IP Intelligence Dossier
Your IP: 216.73.216.123
{ } JSON πŸ”§ Full Actions API
πŸ€– Witness AIThis summary was generated by AI and may contain inaccuracies. Verify critical details independently.

IP Intelligence Briefing: 102.64.39.126

Date: 2026-06-08

---

**1. Risk Profile**

---

**2. Ownership & Geolocation**

---

**3. DNS & Network Relationships**

- 10 IPs flagged as high-risk (80 score), 18 medium-risk (40–60), 8 low-risk (0–20).

- Subnet abuse density: 27.8% (moderate risk).

---

**4. Threat Observations**

- 2 DNSBL listings (8 total lists, 2 high-severity threats).

- No recent malicious activity or honeypot hits.

- Prefix: `102.64.32.0/21` (AS327991, Megasurf).

- Route stability: Unstable (0 changes in 30 days).

---

**5. Actionable Recommendations**

1. Monitor Subnet Activity: High-risk neighbors (e.g., 102.64.39.14, 102.64.39.15) may indicate network compromise.

2. Verify DNS Resolutions: Confirm legitimacy of `ms-39-126.megasurf.co.za` and check for spoofing.

3. Review Routing Stability: Investigate BGP instability for potential network manipulation.

4. Check Email Headers: SPF/DKIM validation is enabled, but no email reputation data available.

---

Conclusion: While 102.64.39.126 shows no direct malicious activity, its subnet contains high-risk neighbors and moderate abuse density. Further investigation into routing anomalies and DNS behavior is recommended.

This summary was generated by AI and may contain inaccuracies. Verify critical details independently.

🌍 Geolocation

CountryπŸ‡ΏπŸ‡¦ South Africa
RegionGauteng
CityVanderbijlpark
TimezoneAfrica/Johannesburg
Latitude-26.70
Longitude27.82

🏒 Ownership & Registration

OrganizationJacobus De Beer
ASNAS327991
Network Name102.64.39.0 - 102.64.39.255
CIDR Block102.64.39.0/24
RIRAFRINIC
CountryZA
Abuse Contactβ€”

🌐 DNS Intelligence

PTRms-39-126.megasurf.co.za
Forward ConfirmedYes β€” FCrDNS verified
Forward Hostnamesms-39-126.megasurf.co.za

πŸ” DNS Hygiene

Hygiene Score80% (Excellent)
SPFPresent
DMARCPresent
FCrDNSVerified
DNSSECValid
CAANot configured

☁️ Network Classification

InfrastructureUnknown
Service PurposeFirewalled / No Services
Network TierUnknown β€” Insufficient routing data to classify
No specific classification

πŸ”Œ Services & Open Ports

PortServiceProtocolBanner
No open ports detected
Serverβ€”
HTTP Titleβ€”

πŸ” TLS Certificate

πŸ”’
No certificate
Issued by β€”
N/A
SANsNone
Valid Fromβ€”
Valid Untilβ€”

🎯 Confidence Breakdown

Per-dimension confidence scores based on source diversity and data freshness

DimensionScoreSourcesObservations
threat
13%
11
routing
13%
11
services
13%
11
ownership
24%
22
reputation
0%
00
geolocation
13%
11
Overall13%66
Coverage: 6/6 dimensions Β· Data sufficiency: sufficient
Data CoherenceConsistent (100%)
AttributionModerate (70%)
OwnershipFCrDNSGeo ConsensusGeo PlausibleIRR MatchRPKI Valid

πŸ“… Observation Timeline πŸ”„ Live

First Seen2026-05-19 03:34:25 UTC
Last Seen2026-06-08 16:48:40 UTC
Profile Built2026-06-04 20:30:33 UTC
Data FreshnessLive
Signal Types11
Total Observations11
πŸ” 11 signal types Β· 11 observations collected
This report is generated from 11+ independent intelligence signals including ownership records, DNS analysis, BGP routing, TLS certificates, port scanning, threat feeds, behavioral fingerprinting, and more.
Full dossier details are available via our API.
{ } JSON API πŸ”§ Actions API πŸ“§ Enterprise Access

ℹ️ About This Report

All data shown is publicly available network metadata β€” IP addresses do not reliably identify individuals. Assessments are probabilistic and should not be used as sole basis for access control decisions. To report an issue or request data review, contact admin@ipdebrief.com.