IPDebrief

102.64.39.158

IP Intelligence Dossier
Your IP: 216.73.216.5
{ } JSON πŸ”§ Full Actions API
πŸ€– Witness AIThis summary was generated by AI and may contain inaccuracies. Verify critical details independently.

# IPDebrief Intelligence Briefing: 102.64.39.158/32

Date: Current Analysis Period

Classification: Low Risk / No Immediate Action Required

---

## Executive Summary

IP address 102.64.39.158 is classified as Low Risk with a risk score of 0. The address shows no active threat indicators, no open services, and no known malicious activity. Despite conflicting geolocation data and a sparsely populated subnet neighborhood, current telemetry indicates minimal operational presence and no observable malicious behavior.

---

## Profile Assessment

MetricValue
**Risk Score**0 / 100
**Provider Score**0
**Authority Score**0
**Stability Score**0
**Overall Reputation**Low Risk
**Confidence Level**0.0833 (Data Insufficient)

Geolocation Discrepancy

Network Classification

Control Plane Status

---

## Threat Intelligence

Current Threat Indicators

Behavioral Analysis

Observational History

Total observations: 13

Recent signals include DNSSEC validation attempts and SPF/DMARC record detection. Historical data shows ASN assignment to Megasurf Wireless Internet CC (ZA) for the 102.64.32.0/21 block, allocated 2019-06-12 via AfriNIC.

---

## Neighborhood Analysis

Subnet: 102.64.39.0/24

Total Neighbors: 86

Abuse Density: 0.012 (Low)

Risk Distribution

Notable Neighbor IPs

IP AddressRisk ScoreAuthority Score
102.64.39.144060
102.64.39.154060
102.64.39.211560
102.64.39.231560

*Additional 81 neighbors with lower risk scores.*

---

## Relationships

No direct relationships identified. No links to related subnets, hostnames, organizations, or certificates.

---

## Recommended Actions

Current Risk: No immediate action required.

Firewall Configuration

No specific firewall rules recommended at this time. The IP exhibits no active scanning, enumeration, or malicious behavior.

Monitoring Recommendations

1. Maintain Passive Monitoring - No evidence of malicious activity; continue standard traffic observation

2. Monitor Neighborhood - One neighbor (102.64.39.14) shows elevated risk (score 40); monitor for related activity

3. Geolocation Verification - Investigate conflicting GB/ZA location data if operational relevance exists

4. Threshold Review - Reassess if subnet abuse density increases or if 102.64.39.x block shows coordinated activity

---

## Conclusion

IP 102.64.39.158 presents minimal threat risk with no active malicious indicators. The address appears dormant with no open services or threat signatures. While the subnet shows moderate abuse density (0.012) and one high-risk neighbor, the target IP itself requires no defensive action. Continued passive monitoring is sufficient until behavioral changes are observed.

Threat Level: LOW

Action Required: None

Review Cycle: Standard periodic review

This summary was generated by AI and may contain inaccuracies. Verify critical details independently.

🌍 Geolocation

CountryπŸ‡ΏπŸ‡¦ South Africa
RegionGauteng
CityVanderbijlpark
TimezoneAfrica/Johannesburg
Latitude-26.71
Longitude27.84

🏒 Ownership & Registration

OrganizationJacobus De Beer
ASNAS327991
Network Name102.64.39.0 - 102.64.39.255
CIDR Block102.64.39.0/24
RIRAFRINIC
CountryZA
Abuse Contactβ€”

🌐 DNS Intelligence

PTRms-39-158.megasurf.co.za
Forward ConfirmedYes β€” FCrDNS verified
Forward Hostnamesms-39-158.megasurf.co.za

πŸ” DNS Hygiene

Hygiene Score80% (Excellent)
SPFPresent
DMARCPresent
FCrDNSVerified
DNSSECValid
CAANot configured

☁️ Network Classification

InfrastructureUnknown
Service PurposeFirewalled / No Services
Network TierUnknown β€” Insufficient routing data to classify
No specific classification

πŸ”Œ Services & Open Ports

PortServiceProtocolBanner
No open ports detected
Closed Ports22, 25, 80, 443, 3389, 8080, 8443 (0 open / 7 scanned)
Serverβ€”
HTTP Titleβ€”

πŸ” TLS Certificate

πŸ”’
No certificate
Issued by β€”
N/A
SANsNone
Valid Fromβ€”
Valid Untilβ€”

🎯 Confidence Breakdown

Per-dimension confidence scores based on source diversity and data freshness

DimensionScoreSourcesObservations
threat
25%
11
routing
0%
00
services
0%
00
ownership
0%
00
reputation
25%
11
geolocation
0%
00
Overall8%22
Coverage: 2/6 dimensions Β· Data sufficiency: partial
Data CoherenceConsistent (100%)
AttributionModerate (70%)
OwnershipFCrDNSGeo ConsensusGeo PlausibleIRR MatchRPKI Valid

πŸ“… Observation Timeline πŸ”„ Live

First Seen2026-07-25 14:52:11 UTC
Last Seen2026-07-30 03:46:29 UTC
Profile Built2026-07-30 03:53:53 UTC
Data FreshnessLive
Signal Types19
Total Observations19
πŸ” 19 signal types Β· 19 observations collected
This report is generated from 19+ independent intelligence signals including ownership records, DNS analysis, BGP routing, TLS certificates, port scanning, threat feeds, behavioral fingerprinting, and more.
Full dossier details are available via our API.
{ } JSON API πŸ”§ Actions API πŸ“§ Enterprise Access

ℹ️ About This Report

All data shown is publicly available network metadata β€” IP addresses do not reliably identify individuals. Assessments are probabilistic and should not be used as sole basis for access control decisions. To report an issue or request data review, contact admin@ipdebrief.com.