IPDebrief

103.163.220.244

IP Intelligence Dossier
Your IP: 216.73.216.123
{ } JSON ๐Ÿ”ง Full Actions API
๐Ÿค– Witness AIThis summary was generated by AI and may contain inaccuracies. Verify critical details independently.

IP Intelligence Briefing: 103.163.220.244

Date: 2026-06-02

---

**1. Core Profile**

- ASN: 206092

- Organization: XS Usenet (Netname: XSUSENETBV-AP)

- Country: Netherlands (NL)

- City: Chiyoda City (Japan) [Conflict: Country is NL, but city is Tokyo, suggesting possible data inconsistency]

- Coordinates: 52.13°N, 5.29°E

- ISP: XS Usenet (apnic registry)

- No active malicious indicators (no DNSBL listings, spam, or campaign ties).

- DNSSEC Valid: Yes.

- BGP: Subnet 103.163.220.0/24, with 0.0638% abuse density (mostly clean).

---

**2. Observation History**

- DNSBL Listings: 2 entries (high severity, 0.85 confidence).

- Subnet Abuse Density: 6.38% (low risk).

- Network Stability: No route changes; stable BGP prefix.

- Geolocation Consistency: Mixed (city Tokyo vs. country NL).

---

**3. Network Relationships**

- Threat Siblings: 9 IPs with elevated risk.

- Risk Distribution: 2 medium-risk IPs, 141 total IPs (98% low risk).

- Organization: XS Usenet (apnic).

- ASN: 206092 (SECFIREWALLAS - F.N.S. HOLDINGS LIMITED).

---

**4. Threat Context**

---

**5. Recommendations**

1. Monitor Subnet Activity: Track the 9 high-risk neighbors for potential lateral movement or network compromise.

2. Verify Geolocation: Investigate the conflicting city (Tokyo) vs. country (NL) data to avoid misclassification.

3. Check DNSBL Listings: Confirm if the 2 DNSBL entries are false positives or require mitigation.

4. Network Segmentation: Consider isolating this subnet if it hosts sensitive assets, given the presence of risky neighbors.

Conclusion: 103.163.220.244 is low risk but part of a subnet with mixed activity. Prioritize monitoring the broader network context.

This summary was generated by AI and may contain inaccuracies. Verify critical details independently.

๐ŸŒ Geolocation

Country๐Ÿ‡ณ๐Ÿ‡ฑ Netherlands
RegionTokyo
CityChiyoda City
TimezoneEurope/Amsterdam
Latitude52.13
Longitude5.29

๐Ÿข Ownership & Registration

OrganizationXS Usenet
ASNAS206092
Network NameXSUSENETBV-AP
CIDR Block103.163.220.0/23
RIRAPNIC
CountryNL
Abuse ContactAvailable via RDAP

๐ŸŒ DNS Intelligence

PTR RecordNo PTR
Forward ConfirmedNo โ€” PTR hostname does not resolve back to this IP (weak signal)

๐Ÿ” DNS Hygiene

Hygiene Score20% (Poor)
SPFNot configured
DMARCNot configured
FCrDNSNot verified
DNSSECValid
CAANot configured

โ˜๏ธ Network Classification

InfrastructureUnknown
Service PurposeFirewalled / No Services
Network TierUnknown โ€” Insufficient routing data to classify
No specific classification

๐Ÿ”Œ Services & Open Ports

PortServiceProtocolBanner
No open ports detected
Closed Ports22, 25, 80, 443, 3389, 8080, 8443 (0 open / 7 scanned)
Serverโ€”
HTTP Titleโ€”

๐Ÿ” TLS Certificate

๐Ÿ”’
No certificate
Issued by โ€”
N/A
SANsNone
Valid Fromโ€”
Valid Untilโ€”

๐ŸŽฏ Confidence Breakdown

Per-dimension confidence scores based on source diversity and data freshness

DimensionScoreSourcesObservations
threat
32%
23
routing
13%
11
services
15%
22
ownership
27%
23
reputation
17%
12
geolocation
30%
23
Overall22%1014
Coverage: 6/6 dimensions ยท Data sufficiency: sufficient
Data CoherenceConsistent (100%)
AttributionModerate (50%)
OwnershipFCrDNSGeo ConsensusGeo PlausibleIRR MatchRPKI Valid

๐Ÿ“… Observation Timeline ๐Ÿ”„ Live

First Seen2026-05-07 23:03:25 UTC
Last Seen2026-06-22 06:29:34 UTC
Profile Built2026-06-22 06:35:32 UTC
Data FreshnessLive
Signal Types22
Total Observations23
๐Ÿ” 22 signal types ยท 23 observations collected
This report is generated from 22+ independent intelligence signals including ownership records, DNS analysis, BGP routing, TLS certificates, port scanning, threat feeds, behavioral fingerprinting, and more.
Full dossier details are available via our API.
{ } JSON API ๐Ÿ”ง Actions API ๐Ÿ“ง Enterprise Access

โ„น๏ธ About This Report

All data shown is publicly available network metadata โ€” IP addresses do not reliably identify individuals. Assessments are probabilistic and should not be used as sole basis for access control decisions. To report an issue or request data review, contact admin@ipdebrief.com.