IPDebrief

103.69.84.230

IP Intelligence Dossier
Your IP: 216.73.216.123
{ } JSON πŸ”§ Full Actions API
πŸ€– Witness AIThis summary was generated by AI and may contain inaccuracies. Verify critical details independently.

IP Intelligence Briefing: 103.69.84.230

Date: 2026-06-06

---

**1. Risk Profile**

---

**2. Network Behavior**

- 7 IPs in the subnet, with 6 flagged as risky (scores 40–65).

- Notable neighbor: 103.69.84.240 (risk score 65).

- DNSSEC valid, but listed in 1 DNSBL (out of 8).

- BGP route stability: Unstable (route changes in last 30 days).

---

**3. Historical Observations**

- Geolocation inferred with 0.52 confidence (600 km accuracy).

- Operator score: 0.13 (Minimal risk).

- No persistent malicious activity detected (threat observation count: 1).

- Ownership stable (no changes in 30 days).

---

**4. Relationships & Context**

---

**5. Actionable Insights**

---

Recommendation: While the IP itself is not malicious, its subnet’s elevated risk and neighboring IPs warrant closer scrutiny. SOC teams should prioritize monitoring lateral movement risks and validate DNSBL context.

This summary was generated by AI and may contain inaccuracies. Verify critical details independently.

🌍 Geolocation

CountryπŸ‡»πŸ‡³ Vietnam
RegionHo Chi Minh
CityHo Chi Minh City
TimezoneAsia/Ho_Chi_Minh
Latitude10.82
Longitude106.63

🏒 Ownership & Registration

OrganizationVu Anh Tuan
ASNAS150884
Network Nameβ€”
CIDR Blockβ€”
RIRAPNIC
Countryβ€”
Abuse ContactAvailable via RDAP

🌐 DNS Intelligence

PTR RecordNo PTR
Forward ConfirmedNo β€” PTR hostname does not resolve back to this IP (weak signal)

πŸ” DNS Hygiene

Hygiene Score20% (Poor)
SPFNot configured
DMARCNot configured
FCrDNSNot verified
DNSSECValid
CAANot configured

☁️ Network Classification

InfrastructureUnknown
Service PurposeFirewalled / No Services
Network TierUnknown β€” Insufficient routing data to classify
No specific classification

πŸ”Œ Services & Open Ports

PortServiceProtocolBanner
No open ports detected
Serverβ€”
HTTP Titleβ€”

πŸ” TLS Certificate

πŸ”’
No certificate
Issued by β€”
N/A
SANsNone
Valid Fromβ€”
Valid Untilβ€”

🎯 Confidence Breakdown

Per-dimension confidence scores based on source diversity and data freshness

DimensionScoreSourcesObservations
threat
27%
23
routing
13%
11
services
13%
11
ownership
27%
23
reputation
22%
13
geolocation
23%
22
Overall21%913
Coverage: 6/6 dimensions Β· Data sufficiency: sufficient
Data CoherenceMostly Consistent (80%) β€” 1 contradiction(s)
AttributionLow (35%)
OwnershipFCrDNSGeo ConsensusGeo PlausibleIRR MatchRPKI Valid
⚠ Geo sources disagree on country: IN, VN

πŸ“… Observation Timeline πŸ”„ Live

First Seen2026-05-12 21:53:28 UTC
Last Seen2026-06-06 14:24:58 UTC
Profile Built2026-06-06 14:26:46 UTC
Data FreshnessLive
Signal Types16
Total Observations16
πŸ” 16 signal types Β· 16 observations collected
This report is generated from 16+ independent intelligence signals including ownership records, DNS analysis, BGP routing, TLS certificates, port scanning, threat feeds, behavioral fingerprinting, and more.
Full dossier details are available via our API.
{ } JSON API πŸ”§ Actions API πŸ“§ Enterprise Access

ℹ️ About This Report

All data shown is publicly available network metadata β€” IP addresses do not reliably identify individuals. Assessments are probabilistic and should not be used as sole basis for access control decisions. To report an issue or request data review, contact admin@ipdebrief.com.