106.1.8.107
IP Intelligence Dossier
Your IP: 216.73.216.123
🤖 Witness AIThis summary was generated by AI and may contain inaccuracies. Verify critical details independently.
IP Intelligence Briefing: 106.1.8.107
Date: 2026-06-17
---
**1. Risk Profile**
- Risk Score: 80 (High Risk)
- Provider/Authority Scores: 0
- Stability: Minimal (0.2174 operator score)
- Threat Indicators: No malicious activity detected (no blacklists, campaigns, or spam sources).
---
**2. Ownership & Geolocation**
- ASN: 38841 (Kbro adm)
- Network: KBRO-NET (APNIC registered)
- Location: Taiwan (Changhua), Latitude 23.7, Longitude 120.96
- Subnet: 106.1.8.0/22 (classified as "mostly_clean" with low abuse density).
---
**3. Network Behavior**
- Firewalled/No Services: No open ports, TLS, or HTTP services detected.
- DNS: No PTR records, SPF/DKIM/DNSSEC misconfigurations noted (CAA issues).
- Routing: BGP prefix 106.1.0.0/17, stable route with 8 RPKI-validations.
---
**4. Observation History (Last 7 Days)**
- Risk Trends: Minimal risk (0.25 operator score) with no persistent threats.
- DNSSEC: Validated, but CAA records missing.
- Abuse: 5/8 DNSBL listings (moderate risk).
---
**5. Relationships & Neighbors**
- Linked Entities: Multiple references to KBRO-NET (same network).
- Subnet Neighbors: No active siblings (subnet 106.1.8.107/24 shows 0 neighbors).
---
**6. Recommended Actions**
1. Monitor DNS Configurations: Address missing CAA records and DNSSEC validation gaps.
2. Check Subnet Activity: Verify isolation of 106.1.8.107/24; no neighbors detected.
3. Route Stability: Confirm BGP route stability and RPKI compliance.
4. Threat Correlation: Cross-reference with KBRO-NET for potential network-wide risks.
---
Note: No immediate mitigation required, but ongoing monitoring is advised due to DNS misconfigurations and low abuse density.
This summary was generated by AI and may contain inaccuracies. Verify critical details independently.
🏢 Ownership & Registration
| Organization | Kbro adm |
| ASN | AS38841 |
| Network Name | KBRO-NET |
| CIDR Block | 106.1.8.0/22 |
| RIR | APNIC |
| Country | TW |
| Abuse Contact | — |
🌐 DNS Intelligence
| PTR Record | No PTR |
| Forward Confirmed | No — PTR hostname does not resolve back to this IP (weak signal) |
🔐 DNS Hygiene
| Hygiene Score | 40% (Fair) |
| SPF | Not configured |
| DMARC | Not configured |
| FCrDNS | Not verified |
| DNSSEC | Valid |
| CAA | Present |
☁️ Network Classification
| Infrastructure | Unknown |
| Service Purpose | Firewalled / No Services |
| Network Tier | Unknown — Insufficient routing data to classify |
🔌 Services & Open Ports
| Port | Service | Protocol | Banner |
|---|---|---|---|
| No open ports detected | |||
| Closed Ports | 22, 25, 80, 443, 3389, 8080, 8443 (0 open / 7 scanned) | ||
| Server | — |
| HTTP Title | — |
🔐 TLS Certificate
No certificate
Issued by —
N/A
| SANs | None |
| Valid From | — |
| Valid Until | — |
🎯 Confidence Breakdown
Per-dimension confidence scores based on source diversity and data freshness
| Dimension | Score | Sources | Observations |
|---|---|---|---|
| threat | 26% | 2 | 4 |
| routing | 13% | 1 | 1 |
| services | 24% | 2 | 3 |
| ownership | 15% | 2 | 2 |
| reputation | 21% | 1 | 3 |
| geolocation | 30% | 2 | 3 |
| Overall | 21% | 10 | 16 |
Coverage: 6/6 dimensions · Data sufficiency: sufficient
| Data Coherence | Consistent (100%) |
| Attribution | Moderate (50%) |
| OwnershipFCrDNSGeo ConsensusGeo PlausibleIRR MatchRPKI Valid |
📅 Observation Timeline 🔄 Live
| First Seen | 2026-05-07 23:03:28 UTC |
| Last Seen | 2026-06-22 07:56:30 UTC |
| Profile Built | 2026-06-22 08:05:31 UTC |
| Data Freshness | Live |
| Signal Types | 21 |
| Total Observations | 24 |
🔍 21 signal types · 24 observations collected
This report is generated from 21+ independent intelligence signals including
ownership records, DNS analysis, BGP routing, TLS certificates, port scanning, threat feeds,
behavioral fingerprinting, and more.
Full dossier details are available via our API.
Full dossier details are available via our API.
ℹ️ About This Report
All data shown is publicly available network metadata — IP addresses do not reliably identify individuals.
Assessments are probabilistic and should not be used as sole basis for access control decisions.
To report an issue or request data review, contact admin@ipdebrief.com.