106.219.123.247

{ } JSON 🔧 Full Actions API

🤖 Witness AIThis summary was generated by AI and may contain inaccuracies. Verify critical details independently.

# INTELLIGENCE BRIEFING: 106.219.123.247

Classification: LOW RISK

Date: July 29, 2026

Analysis Period: Current observation window

---

## Executive Summary

IP address 106.219.123.247 is a mobile network infrastructure endpoint belonging to Bharti Airtel Ltd. (ASN 24560). The IP presents as a firewalled residential mobile connection with no active services, no known threat indicators, and a low risk score of 25/100. No immediate blocking or mitigation actions are warranted based on current threat intelligence.

---

## Technical Profile

Network Classification:

Owner: IRT-BHARTI-MO-IN (Bharti Airtel Ltd.)
ASN: 24560 (APNIC region)
CIDR Block: 106.219.112.0/20
Geolocation: Faridabad, Haryana, India (28.41°N, 77.31°E)
Mobile Carrier: Airtel (MCC: 404, MNC: 10)
Connection Technology: LTE/5G

Network Role:

Mobile device connection (confirmed)
No open ports detected
No services running
Firewalled endpoint
Not a Tor exit, proxy, CDN, VPN, or hosting service

DNS Resolution:

No PTR records
No forward resolution
No hosted domains
No email authentication records (SPF/DMARC)

---

## Threat Assessment

Risk Score: 25/100 (Low Risk)

Threat Indicators:

Blacklist count: 0
Known campaigns: None detected
Threat feeds: No matches
Is known attacker: No
Is spam source: No
Abuse confidence score: Not applicable

Control Plane Analysis:

Origin ASN: 24560
BGP Prefix: 106.219.122.0/23
Route stability: Inconsistent (isRouteStable: false)
DNSSEC valid: Yes
DNSBL listings: 1 of 8 total lists (minor listing)
Operator score: 0.1304 (Minimal)

Persistence Analysis:

Threat observation count: 0
Threat persistence days: 0
Persistently malicious: No
Ownership changes: 0

---

## Neighborhood Analysis

Subnet: 106.219.123.247/24

Abuse Density: 0 (Clean classification)

Sibling IP Risk Distribution:

IP Address	Risk Score	Authority Score	Classification
106.219.123.80	0	50	Clean
106.219.123.206	40	50	Medium Risk
106.219.123.221	40	50	Medium Risk

Assessment: The /24 subnet shows 2 medium-risk neighbors and 1 clean neighbor. No high-risk siblings detected. The target IP itself has no inherited risk from neighborhood activity.

---

## Historical Observations

Observation Count: 13 signals recorded

Recent Signal Timeline (July 29, 2026):

13:18:26 UTC: Network classification signal
13:17:20 UTC: Geolocation signal (validated, 6,263.2 km from probe origin)
13:16:57 UTC: Subnet classification (clean, no active threats)
13:16:31 UTC: Ownership stability signal
13:15:41 UTC: Provider/organization identification (IRT-BHARTI-MO-IN)

Temporal Analysis: No observed

Thinking Process:

1. Analyze the Request:

* Input: A continuation request ("Continue exactly where you left off. Do not repeat text already written. Finish the remaining answer only.").

* Context: The previous response was an intelligence briefing for IP 106.219.123.247, cut off mid-sentence in the "Historical Observations" section ("Temporal Analysis: No observed...").

* Constraint: Write in third person, past tense, using only the data returned by the tools. Do not speculate. Do not include disclaimers.

* Goal: Complete the briefing narrative, specifically finishing the "Historical Observations" section and closing the document with a concise, actionable conclusion suitable for a SOC analyst, based on the data provided in the first turn.

2. Review Available Data (from the first turn):

* `ipdebrief_profile`: Risk 25, Mobile (Airtel), Firewalled, No services, Geo (Faridabad, India), AbuseConfidenceScore null, Threat indicators empty.

* `ipdebrief_history`: 13 observations. Recent ones show network classification, geo validation (ICMP blocked), subnet classification (clean), ownership stability, provider ID. Timestamps around 2026-07-29.

* `ipdebrief_relationships`: Same Network relationships to "Noida".

* `ipdebrief_neighbors`: 3 neighbors. Risk distribution: 0 high, 2 medium, 1 low. Specific IPs listed with scores.

* `ipdebrief_actions`: Risk 25, Recommendations empty (but disclaimer exists).

3. Identify Cut-off Point:

* Previous text ended: "Temporal Analysis: No observed" in the "Historical Observations" section.

* Need to complete the sentence and the section, then add a "Conclusion/Recommendation" section to wrap up the intelligence brief.

4. Drafting the Continuation:

* *Complete the cut-off sentence:* The data shows `threat_persistence_days: 0` and `is_persistently_malicious: false`. So, "No observed threat persistence or long-term malicious activity patterns."

* *Finish "Historical Observations":* Mention the 13 signals, the specific recent findings (provider ID, subnet classification), and note the lack of high-confidence malicious signals (confidence scores ranged from 0.30 to 0.90 but mostly benign classifications).

* *Create "Recommendations/Conclusion":* Based on Risk Score 25 and empty threat indicators, the recommendation is typically "Monitor" or "Allow" with context about mobile traffic. The `ipdebrief_actions` showed empty recommendations with a disclaimer. I should state that no specific firewall rules were generated by the tool, but the low risk suggests no blocking.

* *Tone:* Professional, third-person, past tense, concise.

5. Refining the Content:

* *Historical Observations:* "signals recorded" (13 total). "Recent activities include..." (Provider ID, Geo validation). "No persistent threat patterns observed."

* *Recommendation:* "Based on the low risk profile..." "No immediate action required..." "Monitor for changes..."

* *Data Accuracy:* Ensure I don't invent dates or scores not in the data. The tool showed `recommendations: []`, so I must state that the tool did not generate specific firewall rules, but the risk score allows for standard handling of mobile traffic.

6. Drafting the text:

* "persistence."

* "All observed signals remained consistent with mobile infrastructure behavior, with no high-confidence malicious classifications recorded in the recent timeline."

* "Relationships indicate association with the 'Noida' network designation, consistent with the Bharti Airtel ASN structure."

* "Recommendations: The tool returned no specific firewall rules, consistent with the low-risk classification."

* "Conclusion: Treat as benign mobile traffic. No blocking advised."

7. Final Review against Constraints:

* Third person? Yes.

* Past tense? Yes.

* Only data shown? Yes (Risk 25, 13 observations, no recommendations).

* No disclaimers? Yes.

* Continue exactly where left off? Yes (start with "persistence." or complete the sentence logically).

*Wait, looking at the cutoff:* "Temporal Analysis: No observed".

I should complete that sentence first. "Temporal Analysis: No observed threat persistence."

Then finish the section.

Then add the final sections.

*Correction:* The previous text ended with "Temporal Analysis: No observed". I need to continue from there.

Actually, looking at the prompt structure, I should finish the *document*. The previous text stopped in the middle of a paragraph. I will complete the sentence and paragraph, then add the remaining sections.

*Sentence completion:* "Temporal Analysis: No observed threat persistence or long-term malicious activity patterns." (Based on `threat_persistence_days: 0`).

*Next:* Finish the History section summary.

*Next:* Add Actionable Conclusion/Recommendation.

*Let's check the data again for the "Temporal Analysis" sentence.*

`threat_persistence_days: 0`, `is_persistently_malicious: false`.

So: "Temporal Analysis: No observed threat persistence."

*Let's check the Action section.*

`recommendations: []`.

So: "No automated recommendations were generated."

*Let's check the Neighborhood.*

Risk distribution: High 0, Medium 2, Low 1.

*Let's check the History.*

13 observations.

*Drafting:*

... threat persistence.

The historical log indicates 13 observations, primarily consisting of network classification and geolocation validation. No malicious signal types were recorded in the recent window.

...

Recommendations: The IPDebrief tool returned no specific firewall rules.

Conclusion: No immediate action required.

*Refining for flow and professionalism:*

"persistence."

"The historical record indicates 13 observations, primarily consisting of network classification and geolocation validation signals. No high-confidence malicious signal types were recorded in the recent timeline."

"Actionable Conclusion: The IP presents as a benign mobile endpoint with a risk score of 25. No automated recommendations were generated by the tool. Standard traffic handling is appropriate without blocking."

*Wait, I need to make sure I don't introduce new sections if the previous text didn't have them, but usually a brief needs a conclusion. The previous text had sections: Executive Summary, Technical Profile, Threat Assessment, Neighborhood Analysis, Historical Observations.*

I need to finish Historical Observations, then add Recommendations/Conclusion.

*Let's look at the very end of the previous output:*

"Temporal Analysis: No observed"

So I start with "persistence." or similar.

*Wait, looking at the previous output text:*

"Temporal Analysis: No observed"

Actually, the previous output ended with: `Temporal Analysis: No observed`

Wait, the text was: `Temporal Analysis: No observed` then it cut off.

I will complete the sentence: `Temporal Analysis: No observed threat persistence or long-term malicious activity patterns.`

Then close the History section.

Then add a Conclusion section.

*Wait, one more check:* The previous output ended with: