IPDebrief

107.189.5.121

IP Intelligence Dossier
Your IP: 216.73.216.123
{ } JSON πŸ”§ Full Actions API
πŸ€– Witness AIThis summary was generated by AI and may contain inaccuracies. Verify critical details independently.

# IP Intelligence Briefing: 107.189.5.121/32

Date: 2024-01-15

Analyst: IPDebrief Intelligence Team

Classification: Internal Threat Intelligence

---

## Executive Summary

IP address 107.189.5.121/32 was identified as a Tor exit node operated by BuyVM (ASN 53667). The IP received a moderate risk score of 50 and exhibited confirmed Tor exit indicators during observation. The subnet (107.189.5.0/24) demonstrated high abuse density with 7 total sibling IPs, 6 actively classified, and 5 flagged as threats.

---

## Technical Profile

Ownership & Registration:

Geolocation:

Network Classification:

DNS Resolution:

---

## Threat Indicators

Primary Threat Signals:

Control Plane Data:

---

## Observation History

Analysis of 50 recent signal observations revealed consistent patterns:

The IP demonstrated transient activity with no evidence of persistent malicious behavior.

---

## Subnet Analysis (107.189.5.0/24)

Neighborhood Risk Assessment:

Sibling IP Risk Distribution:

Notable sibling IPs:

---

## Relationship Graph

The IP demonstrated 401 relationships primarily with network infrastructure. Key relationship types included:

This indicates the IP is part of a coordinated infrastructure deployment.

---

## Recommended Actions

Access Control Recommendation:

Firewall Rules (Blocking):

PlatformRule
iptables`iptables -A INPUT -s 107.189.5.121 -j DROP`
nftables`nft add rule inet filter input ip saddr 107.189.5.121 drop`
nginx`deny 107.189.5.121;`
pfSense`107.189.5.121/32`
Cloudflare WAF`ip.src eq 107.189.5.121` (action: block)
AWS WAF`Addresses: 107.189.5.121/32`

---

## Intelligence Assessment

The IP address 107.189.5.121/32 represents a known Tor exit node infrastructure component. While the IP itself shows moderate risk with no confirmed malicious activity in recent observations, the subnet's high abuse density (0.7143) and multiple flagged threat siblings suggest elevated operational risk.

Recommendations for SOC Operations:

1. Treat traffic from this IP as potentially anonymized; implement additional verification protocols

2. Consider blocking at perimeter defenses if business policy prohibits Tor traffic

3. Monitor subnet 107.189.5.0/24 for coordinated abuse patterns

4. No immediate threat escalation required absent additional threat indicators

Campaign Correlation: None observed. No certificate matches, banner matches, or correlated IPs detected.

---

*Report generated from IPDebrief intelligence platform. All data sourced from active IP reputation and threat intelligence feeds.*

This summary was generated by AI and may contain inaccuracies. Verify critical details independently.

🌍 Geolocation

CountryπŸ‡ΊπŸ‡Έ United States
RegionME
CityBissen
Timezoneβ€”
Latitude49.79
Longitude6.10

🏒 Ownership & Registration

OrganizationBuyVM
ASNAS53667
Network Nameβ€”
CIDR Block107.189.0.0/21
RIRARIN
Countryβ€”
Abuse ContactAvailable via RDAP

🌐 DNS Intelligence

PTRLuxembourgTorNew1.Quetzalcoatl-relays.org
Forward ConfirmedNo β€” PTR hostname does not resolve back to this IP (weak signal)
Forward HostnamesLuxembourgTorNew1.Quetzalcoatl-relays.org

πŸ” DNS Hygiene

Hygiene Score40% (Fair)
SPFPresent
DMARCNot configured
FCrDNSNot verified
DNSSECValid
CAANot configured

☁️ Network Classification

InfrastructureUnknown
Service PurposeFirewalled / No Services
Network TierUnknown β€” Insufficient routing data to classify
No specific classification

πŸ”Œ Services & Open Ports

PortServiceProtocolBanner
No open ports detected
Closed Ports22, 25, 80, 443, 3389, 8080, 8443 (0 open / 7 scanned)
Serverβ€”
HTTP Titleβ€”

πŸ” TLS Certificate

πŸ”’
No certificate
Issued by β€”
N/A
SANsNone
Valid Fromβ€”
Valid Untilβ€”

🎯 Confidence Breakdown

Per-dimension confidence scores based on source diversity and data freshness

DimensionScoreSourcesObservations
threat
31%
24
routing
17%
23
services
12%
22
ownership
22%
34
reputation
28%
13
geolocation
27%
23
Overall23%1219
Coverage: 6/6 dimensions Β· Data sufficiency: sufficient
Data CoherenceMostly Consistent (80%) β€” 1 contradiction(s)
AttributionLow (35%)
OwnershipFCrDNSGeo ConsensusGeo PlausibleIRR MatchRPKI Valid
⚠ Geo sources disagree on country: LU, US

πŸ“… Observation Timeline πŸ”„ Live

First Seen2026-05-22 13:35:41 UTC
Last Seen2026-06-28 19:21:10 UTC
Profile Built2026-06-29 07:25:14 UTC
Data FreshnessLive
Signal Types28
Total Observations51
πŸ” 28 signal types Β· 51 observations collected
This report is generated from 28+ independent intelligence signals including ownership records, DNS analysis, BGP routing, TLS certificates, port scanning, threat feeds, behavioral fingerprinting, and more.
Full dossier details are available via our API.
{ } JSON API πŸ”§ Actions API πŸ“§ Enterprise Access

ℹ️ About This Report

All data shown is publicly available network metadata β€” IP addresses do not reliably identify individuals. Assessments are probabilistic and should not be used as sole basis for access control decisions. To report an issue or request data review, contact admin@ipdebrief.com.