Threat Intelligence Briefing: IP 108.62.58.63/32
Overview:
The IP address 108.62.58.63/32 was observed engaging in a series of network activities across a defined timeframe. The following intelligence summary provides an analysis based on available data, highlighting observed behaviors, historical patterns, and contextual neighborhood information.
Activity Observations:
- Historical Activity: The IP address demonstrated consistent network communication patterns primarily directed towards a set of known web service endpoints. These activities were predominantly HTTP and HTTPS requests, indicating potential data exchange or API interactions.
- Traffic Volume: Observations noted periodic spikes in traffic volume, coinciding with peak hours, suggesting structured activity possibly tied to scheduled operations or automated processes.
- Behavioral Patterns: Analysis of the communication patterns revealed a regularity in request types and intervals, indicative of automated processes or bot-like behavior. There were no observed anomalies outside the defined patterns during the observation window.
Relationships:
- Associated Domains: The IP address frequently communicated with several domains, including those associated with legitimate cloud services and content delivery networks. This suggests a potential legitimate use case, such as hosting or data delivery services.
- Network Peers: The IP address was observed interacting with other IP addresses within the same subnet, which aligns with typical infrastructure behavior for services hosted on virtual private servers or cloud instances.
Neighborhood Context:
- Subnet Analysis: The IP address is part of a larger subnet (108.62.58.0/24) that hosts a mix of legitimate service providers and various hosting services. The presence of related services within the same subnet supports the likelihood of legitimate operations.
- Known Malicious Associations: No direct associations with known malicious IP addresses or blacklisted entities were detected during the observation period. However, the presence of similar IP patterns in neighboring addresses warrants continued monitoring for any shifts in behavior.
Threat Assessment:
- Risk Level: Moderate. While the observed activities align with typical legitimate service behavior, the consistent automated patterns and traffic spikes necessitate ongoing monitoring for potential misuse or exploitation.
- Actionable Insights: SOC analysts should consider implementing traffic monitoring rules to detect deviations from established patterns, particularly focusing on unexpected traffic spikes or unusual communication endpoints. Correlating with other network indicators can help in identifying potential security incidents.
Recommendations:
- Continued Monitoring: Maintain vigilance on traffic patterns and associated domain interactions for any anomalies or changes in behavior.
- Behavioral Analysis: Utilize anomaly detection tools to identify deviations from the established baseline of activity.
- Incident Response Planning: Prepare for rapid response in case of any detected irregularities, focusing on containment and investigation protocols.
This briefing provides a foundational understanding of the observed activities related to IP 108.62.58.63/32, supporting SOC teams in informed decision-making and proactive threat management.
This summary was generated by AI and may contain inaccuracies. Verify critical details independently.
π’ Ownership & Registration
| Organization | LeaseWeb USA, Inc. Seattle |
| ASN | AS396190 |
| Network Name | β |
| CIDR Block | β |
| RIR | ARIN |
| Country | β |
| Abuse Contact | Available via RDAP |
π DNS Intelligence
| PTR Record | No PTR |
| Forward Confirmed | No β PTR hostname does not resolve back to this IP (weak signal) |
π DNS Hygiene
| Hygiene Score | 40% (Fair) |
| SPF | Not configured |
| DMARC | Not configured |
| FCrDNS | Not verified |
| DNSSEC | Valid |
| CAA | Present |
βοΈ Network Classification
| Infrastructure | Unknown |
| Service Purpose | Firewalled / No Services |
| Network Tier | Unknown β Insufficient routing data to classify |
π Services & Open Ports
| Port | Service | Protocol | Banner |
|---|---|---|---|
| No open ports detected | |||
| Server | β |
| HTTP Title | β |
π TLS Certificate
| SANs | None |
| Valid From | β |
| Valid Until | β |
π― Confidence Breakdown
Per-dimension confidence scores based on source diversity and data freshness
| Dimension | Score | Sources | Observations |
|---|---|---|---|
| threat | 30% | 2 | 3 |
| routing | 13% | 1 | 1 |
| services | 11% | 1 | 2 |
| ownership | 20% | 2 | 3 |
| reputation | 28% | 1 | 3 |
| geolocation | 30% | 2 | 3 |
| Overall | 22% | 9 | 15 |
| Data Coherence | Consistent (100%) |
| Attribution | Moderate (50%) |
| OwnershipFCrDNSGeo ConsensusGeo PlausibleIRR MatchRPKI Valid |
π Observation Timeline π Live
| First Seen | 2026-05-07 23:04:54 UTC |
| Last Seen | 2026-06-26 18:11:54 UTC |
| Profile Built | 2026-06-24 20:40:35 UTC |
| Data Freshness | Live |
| Signal Types | 20 |
| Total Observations | 23 |
Full dossier details are available via our API.