IPDebrief

111.31.165.206

IP Intelligence Dossier
Your IP: 216.73.216.5
{ } JSON πŸ”§ Full Actions API
πŸ€– Witness AIThis summary was generated by AI and may contain inaccuracies. Verify critical details independently.

# IP Intelligence Briefing: 111.31.165.206/32

Classification: High Risk (Risk Score: 80/100)

Date: 2026-07-30

---

## Executive Summary

IP address 111.31.165.206 was assessed as high-risk with a risk score of 80/100. The IP is listed on 5 out of 8 DNSBLs with high-severity classifications. Geoconsensus indicates China (CN), though geolocation data showed inconsistencies (geoPlausible=false). No active services were detectedβ€”the IP is classified as "Firewalled / No Services."

---

## Technical Profile

---

## Threat Indicators

---

## Observation History

Eight signals were recorded, with the most recent activity from 2026-07-30T03:56:28 UTC. Geolocation signals consistently mapped to China (CN) with coordinates 34.7732, 113.722. DNSSEC validation was confirmed for the PTR record. No significant temporal changes in threat persistence were observed.

---

## Neighborhood Analysis (111.31.165.0/24)

The /24 subnet contains 11 sibling IPs with an overall abuse density of 0. Risk distribution shows 5 medium-risk neighbors (scores: 15, 15, 30, 40, 40, 40) and 5 low-risk neighbors (scores: 15, 15, 15). Two neighbors (111.31.165.109, 111.31.165.186) share elevated risk scores of 55. No inherited risk was detected for the target IP.

---

## Recommended Actions

Based on the elevated risk profile, the following security controls are recommended:

Monitoring: Increase logging verbosity and review recent activity from this IP.

Firewall Rules:

---

## Notes

Relationship graph analysis returned no related entities (no associated hostnames, organizations, or certificates). The IP's classification as "Firewalled / No Services" suggests defensive blocking or inactive status, though DNSBL listings indicate prior abusive activity. SOC teams should correlate with internal logs for any historical connections.

This summary was generated by AI and may contain inaccuracies. Verify critical details independently.

🌍 Geolocation

CountryπŸ‡¨πŸ‡³ China
RegionJinrong Ave., Xicheng District, Beijing,
City29
TimezoneAsia/Shanghai
Latitude34.77
Longitude113.72

🏒 Ownership & Registration

OrganizationIRT-CHINAMOBILE-CN
ASNAS38019
Network NameCMNET
CIDR Block111.0.0.0/10
RIRAPNIC
CountryCN
Abuse ContactAvailable via RDAP

🌐 DNS Intelligence

PTR RecordNo PTR
Forward ConfirmedNo β€” PTR hostname does not resolve back to this IP (weak signal)

πŸ” DNS Hygiene

Hygiene Score20% (Poor)
SPFNot configured
DMARCNot configured
FCrDNSNot verified
DNSSECValid
CAANot configured

☁️ Network Classification

InfrastructureUnknown
Service PurposeFirewalled / No Services
Network TierUnknown β€” Insufficient routing data to classify
No specific classification

πŸ”Œ Services & Open Ports

PortServiceProtocolBanner
No open ports detected
Serverβ€”
HTTP Titleβ€”

πŸ” TLS Certificate

πŸ”’
No certificate
Issued by β€”
N/A
SANsNone
Valid Fromβ€”
Valid Untilβ€”

🎯 Confidence Breakdown

Per-dimension confidence scores based on source diversity and data freshness

DimensionScoreSourcesObservations
threat
0%
00
routing
25%
11
services
25%
11
ownership
0%
00
reputation
0%
00
geolocation
0%
00
Overall8%22
Coverage: 2/6 dimensions Β· Data sufficiency: partial
Data CoherenceConsistent (100%)
AttributionModerate (50%)
OwnershipFCrDNSGeo ConsensusGeo PlausibleIRR MatchRPKI Valid

πŸ“… Observation Timeline πŸ”„ Live

First Seen2026-07-25 14:52:18 UTC
Last Seen2026-08-04 11:50:13 UTC
Profile Built2026-07-30 04:00:50 UTC
Data FreshnessLive
Signal Types13
Total Observations13
πŸ” 13 signal types Β· 13 observations collected
This report is generated from 13+ independent intelligence signals including ownership records, DNS analysis, BGP routing, TLS certificates, port scanning, threat feeds, behavioral fingerprinting, and more.
Full dossier details are available via our API.
{ } JSON API πŸ”§ Actions API πŸ“§ Enterprise Access

ℹ️ About This Report

All data shown is publicly available network metadata β€” IP addresses do not reliably identify individuals. Assessments are probabilistic and should not be used as sole basis for access control decisions. To report an issue or request data review, contact admin@ipdebrief.com.