IPDebrief

118.43.202.68

IP Intelligence Dossier
Your IP: 216.73.216.123
{ } JSON πŸ”§ Full Actions API
πŸ€– Witness AIThis summary was generated by AI and may contain inaccuracies. Verify critical details independently.

Threat Intelligence Briefing: IP 118.43.202.68/32

Profile Overview

Key Observations

1. Geolocation Discrepancy: Current geolocation places the IP in South Korea, but historical signals (e.g., BGP data) show inferred locations in China. This may indicate network misconfiguration, transit routing, or spoofing.

2. Network Relationships: Linked to the *KORNET-KR* network (Korea Telecom), suggesting it is part of a larger mobile infrastructure.

3. Risk Context: High risk score due to potential misuse (e.g., mobile network vulnerabilities) and sparse neighbor analysis (no active IPs in the /24 subnet).

Recommended Actions

- `iptables`: `iptables -A INPUT -s 118.43.202.68 -j DROP`

- Cloudflare/WAF: Block via IP-based rule with description "IPDebrief risk 80".

Conclusion

This IP poses a high-risk profile due to its mobile network association and ambiguous geolocation. While no direct malicious activity is detected, proactive monitoring and network validation are critical to mitigate potential risks.

This summary was generated by AI and may contain inaccuracies. Verify critical details independently.

🌍 Geolocation

CountryπŸ‡°πŸ‡· South Korea
RegionUlsan
CityNam-gu
TimezoneAsia/Seoul
Latitude35.91
Longitude127.77

🏒 Ownership & Registration

OrganizationIP Manager
ASNAS4766
Network Nameβ€”
CIDR Blockβ€”
RIRAPNIC
Countryβ€”
Abuse ContactAvailable via RDAP

🌐 DNS Intelligence

PTR RecordNo PTR
Forward ConfirmedNo β€” PTR hostname does not resolve back to this IP (weak signal)

πŸ” DNS Hygiene

Hygiene Score20% (Poor)
SPFNot configured
DMARCNot configured
FCrDNSNot verified
DNSSECValid
CAANot configured

☁️ Network Classification

InfrastructureMobile
Service PurposeFirewalled / No Services
Network TierUnknown β€” Insufficient routing data to classify
Mobile

πŸ”Œ Services & Open Ports

PortServiceProtocolBanner
No open ports detected
Serverβ€”
HTTP Titleβ€”

πŸ” TLS Certificate

πŸ”’
No certificate
Issued by β€”
N/A
SANsNone
Valid Fromβ€”
Valid Untilβ€”

🎯 Confidence Breakdown

Per-dimension confidence scores based on source diversity and data freshness

DimensionScoreSourcesObservations
threat
28%
23
routing
20%
11
services
8%
11
ownership
20%
23
reputation
22%
13
geolocation
27%
23
Overall21%914
Coverage: 6/6 dimensions Β· Data sufficiency: sufficient
Data CoherenceConsistent (100%)
AttributionModerate (50%)
OwnershipFCrDNSGeo ConsensusGeo PlausibleIRR MatchRPKI Valid

πŸ“… Observation Timeline πŸ”„ Fresh

First Seen2026-05-07 23:03:34 UTC
Last Seen2026-06-25 07:54:24 UTC
Profile Built2026-06-24 11:06:06 UTC
Data FreshnessFresh
Signal Types16
Total Observations17
πŸ” 16 signal types Β· 17 observations collected
This report is generated from 16+ independent intelligence signals including ownership records, DNS analysis, BGP routing, TLS certificates, port scanning, threat feeds, behavioral fingerprinting, and more.
Full dossier details are available via our API.
{ } JSON API πŸ”§ Actions API πŸ“§ Enterprise Access

ℹ️ About This Report

All data shown is publicly available network metadata β€” IP addresses do not reliably identify individuals. Assessments are probabilistic and should not be used as sole basis for access control decisions. To report an issue or request data review, contact admin@ipdebrief.com.