IPDebrief

120.26.64.17

IP Intelligence Dossier
Your IP: 216.73.216.123
{ } JSON ๐Ÿ”ง Full Actions API
๐Ÿค– Witness AIThis summary was generated by AI and may contain inaccuracies. Verify critical details independently.

# IP Intelligence Briefing: 120.26.64.17/32

## Executive Summary

IP address 120.26.64.17 presents a low-risk profile with a risk score of 25. The address is assigned to ALISOFT (ALIBABA-CN-NET - Hangzhou Alibaba Advertising Co., Ltd.) within the APNIC region and is geolocated to Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China (CN). No active services or open ports were detected; the system appears firewalled. While historical signal observations indicate threat activity (6 pulse events), current network classification shows the subnet as mostly clean with minimal abuse density.

## Profile Overview

## Threat Indicators

Historical signal analysis reveals 6 threat pulses associated with this IP address. The IP has been flagged in threat feeds with varying confidence levels (0.22โ€“0.85). DNSBL enumeration confirms listing on at least one blacklist. However, no active attacker indicators, Tor exit node activity, or spam source classification was detected in current observations. The IP is not associated with any known malicious campaigns.

## Network Neighborhood Analysis

The /24 subnet (120.26.64.0/24) containing this IP shows:

The neighborhood exhibits low abuse density, suggesting isolated rather than coordinated malicious activity.

## Observed Relationships

Twenty-four relationships were identified, all classified as "Same Network" type, referencing the network name "ALISOFT." This indicates the IP is part of a larger network infrastructure block commonly associated with Alibaba advertising services in China.

## Historical Signal Timeline

Recent observations from June 2026 show:

## Recommended Security Actions

Based on the current low-risk profile and lack of actionable threat indicators, no immediate firewall or WAF rules are recommended. However, the following monitoring practices are advised:

1. Passive Monitoring: Continue passive traffic analysis to detect any service changes

2. DNSBL Review: Investigate the reason for the single DNSBL listing

3. Traffic Baseline: Establish normal traffic patterns for this subnet

4. Threat Pulse Review: Analyze the 6 historical threat pulses for context

## Risk Assessment

Current Risk Level: LOW

Threat Level: LOW-MEDIUM

Recommended Action: Monitor, No Immediate Block

The IP presents a low-risk profile with historical threat indicators but no current active malicious behavior. The absence of open services and minimal neighborhood abuse density support continued monitoring rather than immediate blocking. SOC analysts should correlate any traffic from this IP with broader threat intelligence before taking blocking actions.

This summary was generated by AI and may contain inaccuracies. Verify critical details independently.

๐ŸŒ Geolocation

Country๐Ÿ‡จ๐Ÿ‡ณ China
RegionZJ
CityHangzhou
Timezoneโ€”
Latitude30.29
Longitude120.17

๐Ÿข Ownership & Registration

Organizationsecurity trouble
ASNAS37963
Network NameALISOFT
CIDR Block120.24.0.0/14
RIRAPNIC
CountryCN
Abuse ContactAvailable via RDAP

๐ŸŒ DNS Intelligence

PTR RecordNo PTR
Forward ConfirmedNo โ€” PTR hostname does not resolve back to this IP (weak signal)

๐Ÿ” DNS Hygiene

Hygiene Score20% (Poor)
SPFNot configured
DMARCNot configured
FCrDNSNot verified
DNSSECValid
CAANot configured

โ˜๏ธ Network Classification

InfrastructureUnknown
Service PurposeFirewalled / No Services
Network TierUnknown โ€” Insufficient routing data to classify
No specific classification

๐Ÿ”Œ Services & Open Ports

PortServiceProtocolBanner
No open ports detected
Closed Ports22, 25, 80, 443, 3389, 8080, 8443 (0 open / 7 scanned)
Serverโ€”
HTTP Titleโ€”

๐Ÿ” TLS Certificate

๐Ÿ”’
No certificate
Issued by โ€”
N/A
SANsNone
Valid Fromโ€”
Valid Untilโ€”

๐ŸŽฏ Confidence Breakdown

Per-dimension confidence scores based on source diversity and data freshness

DimensionScoreSourcesObservations
threat
24%
23
routing
17%
11
services
18%
22
ownership
27%
23
reputation
24%
13
geolocation
21%
22
Overall22%1014
Coverage: 6/6 dimensions ยท Data sufficiency: sufficient
Data CoherenceConsistent (100%)
AttributionModerate (50%)
OwnershipFCrDNSGeo ConsensusGeo PlausibleIRR MatchRPKI Valid

๐Ÿ“… Observation Timeline ๐Ÿ”„ Live

First Seen2026-05-07 23:03:35 UTC
Last Seen2026-06-22 11:23:49 UTC
Profile Built2026-06-22 11:30:15 UTC
Data FreshnessLive
Signal Types19
Total Observations20
๐Ÿ” 19 signal types ยท 20 observations collected
This report is generated from 19+ independent intelligence signals including ownership records, DNS analysis, BGP routing, TLS certificates, port scanning, threat feeds, behavioral fingerprinting, and more.
Full dossier details are available via our API.
{ } JSON API ๐Ÿ”ง Actions API ๐Ÿ“ง Enterprise Access

โ„น๏ธ About This Report

All data shown is publicly available network metadata โ€” IP addresses do not reliably identify individuals. Assessments are probabilistic and should not be used as sole basis for access control decisions. To report an issue or request data review, contact admin@ipdebrief.com.