Your IP: 216.73.216.123
๐ค Witness AIThis summary was generated by AI and may contain inaccuracies. Verify critical details independently.
IP Intelligence Briefing: 123.233.69.20/32
*Last Updated: 2026-05-29*
---
**Risk Assessment**
- Overall Risk: Moderate (Risk Score: 40)
- Threat Indicators: No direct malicious activity detected.
- DNSBL Listings: Identified as listed on 2 DNSBLs (abuse confidence score not available).
- Network Stability: Subnet (123.233.69.20/24) shows "mostly_clean" classification with low abuse density (1/256 IPs flagged).
---
**Ownership & Geolocation**
- Registrar: ChinaUnicom Hostmaster (ASN 4837, APNIC).
- Location: Jinan, Shandong Province, China (geolocation inferred with 2500 km accuracy radius).
- Mobile Carrier: China Unicom (MCC 460, MNC 01, LTE/5G).
---
**Network Context**
- Subnet: 123.233.69.20/24 (part of larger 123.232.0.0/14 block).
- Neighbor Analysis: No active neighbors detected in the subnet (0/256 IPs).
- BGP: Route stability flagged as "unstable" with no recent route changes.
---
**Observation History**
- Recent Activity: One observation recorded on 2026-05-29 (mixed confidence levels).
- Services: No open ports or TLS certificates detected.
- DNS: No PTR records resolved; DNSSEC validation failed.
---
**Recommendations**
1. Monitor DNSBL Status: Investigate why this IP is listed on 2 DNSBLs.
2. Check Subnet Activity: Verify if the lack of neighbors is intentional or indicative of a honeypot.
3. Track Route Stability: Watch for BGP changes in the 123.232.0.0/14 block.
4. Validate Geolocation: Cross-reference with mobile carrier data for potential spoofing.
Next Steps: Correlate with internal threat intel feeds and validate DNSBL listings.
---
*Generated by IPDebrief Threat Intelligence Platform*
This summary was generated by AI and may contain inaccuracies. Verify critical details independently.
๐ข Ownership & Registration
| Organization | ChinaUnicom Hostmaster |
| ASN | AS4837 |
| Network Name | UNICOM-SD |
| CIDR Block | 123.232.0.0/14 |
| RIR | APNIC |
| Country | CN |
| Abuse Contact | Available via RDAP |
๐ DNS Intelligence
| PTR Record | No PTR |
| Forward Confirmed | No โ PTR hostname does not resolve back to this IP (weak signal) |
๐ DNS Hygiene
| Hygiene Score | 20% (Poor) |
| SPF | Not configured |
| DMARC | Not configured |
| FCrDNS | Not verified |
| DNSSEC | Valid |
| CAA | Not configured |
โ๏ธ Network Classification
| Infrastructure | Mobile |
| Service Purpose | Firewalled / No Services |
| Network Tier | Unknown โ Insufficient routing data to classify |
๐ Services & Open Ports
| Port | Service | Protocol | Banner |
|---|---|---|---|
| No open ports detected | |||
| Closed Ports | 22, 25, 80, 443, 3389, 8080, 8443 (0 open / 7 scanned) | ||
| Server | โ |
| HTTP Title | โ |
๐ TLS Certificate
No certificate
Issued by โ
N/A
| SANs | None |
| Valid From | โ |
| Valid Until | โ |
๐ฏ Confidence Breakdown
Per-dimension confidence scores based on source diversity and data freshness
| Dimension | Score | Sources | Observations |
|---|---|---|---|
| threat | 27% | 2 | 3 |
| routing | 13% | 1 | 1 |
| services | 19% | 2 | 2 |
| ownership | 27% | 2 | 3 |
| reputation | 22% | 1 | 3 |
| geolocation | 19% | 2 | 2 |
| Overall | 21% | 10 | 14 |
Coverage: 6/6 dimensions ยท Data sufficiency: sufficient
| Data Coherence | Consistent (100%) |
| Attribution | Moderate (50%) |
| OwnershipFCrDNSGeo ConsensusGeo PlausibleIRR MatchRPKI Valid |
๐ Observation Timeline ๐ Live
| First Seen | 2026-05-13 19:03:40 UTC |
| Last Seen | 2026-06-06 23:01:02 UTC |
| Profile Built | 2026-06-06 23:09:02 UTC |
| Data Freshness | Live |
| Signal Types | 18 |
| Total Observations | 18 |
๐ 18 signal types ยท 18 observations collected
This report is generated from 18+ independent intelligence signals including
ownership records, DNS analysis, BGP routing, TLS certificates, port scanning, threat feeds,
behavioral fingerprinting, and more.
Full dossier details are available via our API.
Full dossier details are available via our API.
โน๏ธ About This Report
All data shown is publicly available network metadata โ IP addresses do not reliably identify individuals.
Assessments are probabilistic and should not be used as sole basis for access control decisions.
To report an issue or request data review, contact admin@ipdebrief.com.