IPDebrief

128.1.48.76

IP Intelligence Dossier
Your IP: 216.73.216.5
{ } JSON πŸ”§ Full Actions API
πŸ€– Witness AIThis summary was generated by AI and may contain inaccuracies. Verify critical details independently.

# IPDebrief Intelligence Briefing

Target: 128.1.48.76/32

Classification: Moderate Risk (Score: 40)

Date: 2026-07-30

## Executive Summary

IP 128.1.48.76 belongs to UCLOUD infrastructure (ASN 135377) and presents a moderate risk profile with a risk score of 40. The IP is part of the ZL-TYO-UCLOUD-0037 network block (128.1.48.0/24). The address shows no active services, no open ports, and no known campaign associations. Geographic signal inconsistency (Tokyo, Hong Kong, US) warrants additional monitoring.

## Infrastructure Profile

## Threat Indicators

## Historical Activity

13 signal observations recorded over the monitoring period. Recent activity includes:

## Network Context

- 128.1.48.152 (Risk: 40)

- 128.1.48.187 (Risk: 40)

## Recommended Actions

Block this IP across all security controls:

## Intelligence Assessment

The IP is associated with a cloud infrastructure provider (UCLOUD) and shows moderate risk characteristics. The presence of DNSBL listings and geographic signal inconsistencies suggest potential reputation concerns. The subnet contains 2 additional medium-risk IPs, indicating potential clustering of elevated-risk addresses. Recommend continued monitoring of the 128.1.48.0/24 block for emerging threat activity.

Priority: Medium

Action: Block pending additional correlation with internal threat intelligence feeds.

This summary was generated by AI and may contain inaccuracies. Verify critical details independently.

🌍 Geolocation

CountryπŸ‡ΊπŸ‡Έ United States
Region13
CityTokyo
Timezoneβ€”
Latitudeβ€”
Longitudeβ€”

🏒 Ownership & Registration

OrganizationUCLOUD
ASNAS135377
Network NameZL-TYO-UCLOUD-0037
CIDR Block128.1.48.0/24
RIRARIN
CountryHong Kong
Abuse ContactAvailable via RDAP

🌐 DNS Intelligence

PTR RecordNo PTR
Forward ConfirmedNo β€” PTR hostname does not resolve back to this IP (weak signal)

πŸ” DNS Hygiene

Hygiene Score20% (Poor)
SPFNot configured
DMARCNot configured
FCrDNSNot verified
DNSSECValid
CAANot configured

☁️ Network Classification

InfrastructureUnknown
Service PurposeMulti-Service Host
Network TierUnknown β€” Insufficient routing data to classify
No specific classification

πŸ”Œ Services & Open Ports

PortServiceProtocolBanner
22sshtcp
8080http-alttcpβ€”
Closed Ports25, 80, 443, 3389, 8443 (2 open / 7 scanned)
Serverβ€”
HTTP Titleβ€”
SSH VersionSSH-2.0-OpenSSH_5.3

πŸ” TLS Certificate

πŸ”’
No certificate
Issued by β€”
N/A
SANsNone
Valid Fromβ€”
Valid Untilβ€”

🎯 Confidence Breakdown

Per-dimension confidence scores based on source diversity and data freshness

DimensionScoreSourcesObservations
threat
25%
11
routing
25%
11
services
25%
11
ownership
0%
00
reputation
0%
00
geolocation
0%
00
Overall12%33
Coverage: 3/6 dimensions Β· Data sufficiency: partial
Data CoherenceMostly Consistent (80%) β€” 1 contradiction(s)
AttributionLow (35%)
OwnershipFCrDNSGeo ConsensusGeo PlausibleIRR MatchRPKI Valid
⚠ Geo sources disagree on country: JP, US

πŸ“… Observation Timeline πŸ”„ Live

First Seen2026-07-25 14:52:27 UTC
Last Seen2026-07-30 04:02:12 UTC
Profile Built2026-07-30 04:20:04 UTC
Data FreshnessLive
Signal Types18
Total Observations18
πŸ” 18 signal types Β· 18 observations collected
This report is generated from 18+ independent intelligence signals including ownership records, DNS analysis, BGP routing, TLS certificates, port scanning, threat feeds, behavioral fingerprinting, and more.
Full dossier details are available via our API.
{ } JSON API πŸ”§ Actions API πŸ“§ Enterprise Access

ℹ️ About This Report

All data shown is publicly available network metadata β€” IP addresses do not reliably identify individuals. Assessments are probabilistic and should not be used as sole basis for access control decisions. To report an issue or request data review, contact admin@ipdebrief.com.