IPDebrief

134.122.45.240

IP Intelligence Dossier
Your IP: 216.73.216.123
{ } JSON πŸ”§ Full Actions API
πŸ€– Witness AIThis summary was generated by AI and may contain inaccuracies. Verify critical details independently.

IP Intelligence Briefing: 134.122.45.240

Date: 2026-06-06

**1. Profile Summary**

**2. Observation History**

**3. Relationships**

**4. Neighborhood Analysis**

**5. Recommendations**

Conclusion: 134.122.45.240 is a low-risk, cloud-hosted IP with no threat indicators. No actionable security measures required at this time.

This summary was generated by AI and may contain inaccuracies. Verify critical details independently.

🌍 Geolocation

CountryπŸ‡¨πŸ‡¦ Canada
RegionON
CityToronto
Timezoneβ€”
Latitude43.71
Longitude-79.41

🏒 Ownership & Registration

OrganizationDigitalOcean, LLC
ASNAS14061
Network Nameβ€”
CIDR Blockβ€”
RIRARIN
Countryβ€”
Abuse ContactAvailable via RDAP

🌐 DNS Intelligence

PTR RecordNo PTR
Forward ConfirmedNo β€” PTR hostname does not resolve back to this IP (weak signal)

πŸ” DNS Hygiene

Hygiene Score20% (Poor)
SPFNot configured
DMARCNot configured
FCrDNSNot verified
DNSSECValid
CAANot configured

☁️ Network Classification

InfrastructureInfrastructure / Datacenter
Service PurposeWeb Server
Network TierHosting β€” Infrastructure provider without advanced routing
CloudHosting

πŸ”Œ Services & Open Ports

PortServiceProtocolBanner
80httptcpβ€”
443httpstcpβ€”
22sshtcp
Closed Ports25, 3389, 8080, 8443 (3 open / 7 scanned)
ServerLiteSpeed
HTTP Titleβ€”
SSH VersionSSH-2.0-OpenSSH_9.6p1 Ubuntu-3ubuntu13.15

πŸ” TLS Certificate

A self-signed certificate was detected. This is common for development servers, internal services, or IoT devices.
⚠️
CN=thestudio.blog, O=Dis, L=Springfield, S=Denial, C=US
Issued by CN=thestudio.blog, O=Dis, L=Springfield, S=Denial, C=US
Self-signed: Yes
SANsNone
Valid From2026-05-12T08:39:58+00:00
Valid Until2036-05-09T08:39:58+00:00
TLS ProtocolTls13
Cipher SuiteTLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384
Signature Algorithmsha256RSA
Validity Period3650 days
Serial Number5C2ED9A114CE79BCE94DF1B4DE0ED059EF45A719
Thumbprint344E44614A6A42BD3D934DA6BED34389D64127AD

🎯 Confidence Breakdown

Per-dimension confidence scores based on source diversity and data freshness

DimensionScoreSourcesObservations
threat
31%
24
routing
8%
11
services
28%
23
ownership
20%
23
reputation
30%
13
geolocation
23%
22
Overall23%1016
Coverage: 6/6 dimensions Β· Data sufficiency: sufficient
Data CoherenceMixed Signals (68%) β€” 2 contradiction(s)
AttributionLow (35%)
OwnershipFCrDNSGeo ConsensusGeo PlausibleIRR MatchRPKI Valid
⚠ Geo sources disagree on country: CA, US
⚠ TLS certificate claims US but primary geo says CA

πŸ“… Observation Timeline πŸ”„ Live

First Seen2026-05-12 09:40:06 UTC
Last Seen2026-06-27 21:07:15 UTC
Profile Built2026-06-28 15:13:03 UTC
Data FreshnessLive
Signal Types20
Total Observations24
πŸ” 20 signal types Β· 24 observations collected
This report is generated from 20+ independent intelligence signals including ownership records, DNS analysis, BGP routing, TLS certificates, port scanning, threat feeds, behavioral fingerprinting, and more.
Full dossier details are available via our API.
{ } JSON API πŸ”§ Actions API πŸ“§ Enterprise Access

ℹ️ About This Report

All data shown is publicly available network metadata β€” IP addresses do not reliably identify individuals. Assessments are probabilistic and should not be used as sole basis for access control decisions. To report an issue or request data review, contact admin@ipdebrief.com.