IPDebrief

142.44.233.131

IP Intelligence Dossier
Your IP: 216.73.216.123
{ } JSON ๐Ÿ”ง Full Actions API
๐Ÿค– Witness AIThis summary was generated by AI and may contain inaccuracies. Verify critical details independently.

# IP INTELLIGENCE BRIEFING

Target: 142.44.233.131/32

Analysis Date: 2026-06-17

Classification: Moderate Risk (Context-Dependent)

---

## EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

IP 142.44.233.131 presents a contextually elevated risk profile despite its individual risk score of 30 (Low Risk). The address operates within a high-abuse subnet (142.44.233.0/24) with an abuse density of 0.75 and 192 threat siblings out of 206 active addresses. While the IP resolves to a legitimate domain (ahrefs.net), the subnet-level indicators suggest compromised infrastructure sharing.

---

## PROFILE ANALYSIS

AttributeValue
**Risk Score**30 (Low)
**ASN**16276 (OVH)
**Organization**Dmytro, Ahrefs Pte Ltd
**Network**142.44.233.0/24
**Infrastructure**CloudCompute / Hosting
**DNS Record**proxy-ca003-san131.ahrefs.net
**Open Ports**None detected
**Geolocation**CA (Inconsistent)

Key Indicator: The IP's DNS record resolves to ahrefs.net, a legitimate SEO tools provider. However, geolocation data shows inconsistencies (Country: CA with implausible coordinates 56.13°N, -106.35°W), suggesting potential DNS hijacking or misconfiguration.

---

## SUBNET THREAT CONTEXT

The parent subnet demonstrates concerning abuse patterns:

Assessment: This subnet shows near-uniform abuse characteristics. The high threat sibling count indicates systematic infrastructure compromise, likely due to shared hosting infrastructure or botnet propagation within the /24 block.

---

## OBSERVATION HISTORY

27 historical observations tracked since initial discovery:

---

## RELATIONSHIP MAPPING

44 detected relationships identified, primarily:

No certificate subjects or campaign correlations detected.

---

## SECURITY RECOMMENDATIONS

Immediate Actions:

1. Monitor but do not block at this time. The IP shows no active threat indicators (no blacklist listings, no known campaigns).

2. Apply subnet-level scrutiny given the 93% threat sibling ratio. Consider blocking the entire /24 if security posture permits.

3. Validate DNS resolution - the geolocation inconsistency warrants verification.

Firewall Rules: No specific rules generated due to low individual risk score. Monitor for behavioral anomalies.

---

## CONCLUSION

The target IP presents moderate contextual risk. While the individual address shows no malicious indicators, the high-abuse subnet environment suggests potential for infrastructure sharing with compromised hosts. SOC teams should maintain elevated monitoring for traffic patterns from this subnet rather than immediate blocking, which could impact legitimate ahrefs.net traffic.

Priority: Medium

Recommended Action: Enhanced monitoring with subnet-level awareness

This summary was generated by AI and may contain inaccuracies. Verify critical details independently.

๐ŸŒ Geolocation

Country๐Ÿ‡จ๐Ÿ‡ฆ Canada
RegionQC
CitySingapore
Timezoneโ€”
Latitude45.51
Longitude-73.59

๐Ÿข Ownership & Registration

OrganizationDmytro, Ahrefs Pte Ltd
ASNAS16276
Network NameOVH-CUST-281059682
CIDR Block142.44.233.0/24
RIRARIN
CountrySingapore
Abuse Contactโ€”

๐ŸŒ DNS Intelligence

PTRproxy-ca003-san131.ahrefs.net
Forward ConfirmedNo โ€” PTR hostname does not resolve back to this IP (weak signal)
Forward Hostnamesproxy-ca003-san131.ahrefs.net

๐Ÿ” DNS Hygiene

Hygiene Score40% (Fair)
SPFNot configured
DMARCNot configured
FCrDNSNot verified
DNSSECValid
CAAPresent

โ˜๏ธ Network Classification

InfrastructureInfrastructure / Datacenter
Service PurposeFirewalled / No Services
Network TierTier 2 โ€” Moderate operator sophistication with routing hygiene
CloudHosting

๐Ÿ”Œ Services & Open Ports

PortServiceProtocolBanner
No open ports detected
Closed Ports22, 25, 80, 443, 3389, 8080, 8443 (0 open / 7 scanned)
Serverโ€”
HTTP Titleโ€”

๐Ÿ” TLS Certificate

๐Ÿ”’
No certificate
Issued by โ€”
N/A
SANsNone
Valid Fromโ€”
Valid Untilโ€”

๐ŸŽฏ Confidence Breakdown

Per-dimension confidence scores based on source diversity and data freshness

DimensionScoreSourcesObservations
threat
31%
24
routing
22%
34
services
12%
22
ownership
26%
33
reputation
30%
13
geolocation
34%
23
Overall26%1319
Coverage: 6/6 dimensions ยท Data sufficiency: sufficient
Data CoherenceMostly Consistent (80%) โ€” 1 contradiction(s)
AttributionModerate (50%)
OwnershipFCrDNSGeo ConsensusGeo PlausibleIRR MatchRPKI Valid
โš  Claimed geolocation contradicts RTT physics measurement

๐Ÿ“… Observation Timeline ๐Ÿ”„ Live

First Seen2026-05-07 23:03:43 UTC
Last Seen2026-06-26 23:15:41 UTC
Profile Built2026-06-27 19:29:01 UTC
Data FreshnessLive
Signal Types27
Total Observations35
๐Ÿ” 27 signal types ยท 35 observations collected
This report is generated from 27+ independent intelligence signals including ownership records, DNS analysis, BGP routing, TLS certificates, port scanning, threat feeds, behavioral fingerprinting, and more.
Full dossier details are available via our API.
{ } JSON API ๐Ÿ”ง Actions API ๐Ÿ“ง Enterprise Access

โ„น๏ธ About This Report

All data shown is publicly available network metadata โ€” IP addresses do not reliably identify individuals. Assessments are probabilistic and should not be used as sole basis for access control decisions. To report an issue or request data review, contact admin@ipdebrief.com.