IPDebrief

142.44.233.176

IP Intelligence Dossier
Your IP: 216.73.217.135
{ } JSON ๐Ÿ”ง Full Actions API
๐Ÿค– Witness AIThis summary was generated by AI and may contain inaccuracies. Verify critical details independently.

# IP INTELLIGENCE BRIEFING: 142.44.233.176/32

## EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

Threat Level: Moderate Risk (Score: 40/100)

Classification: High-Abuse Cloud Infrastructure

Recommendation: Block at perimeter with monitoring

## OWNERSHIP & INFRASTRUCTURE

Provider: OVH (ASN: 16276)

Organization: Dmytro, Ahrefs Pte Ltd

CIDR Block: 142.44.233.0/24

Infrastructure Type: CloudCompute / Hosting

Geolocation: Disputed โ€” ASN registration indicates Canada (CA), but geolocation probes report Singapore with 3000km accuracy radius. Geovalidation flagged as implausible.

DNS Resolution: proxy-ca003-san176.ahrefs.net (ahrefs.net domain)

Network Role: Firewalled / No Services (no open ports detected)

## THREAT INDICATORS

Direct Threat Signals: None detected

Blacklist Status: 0 direct blacklists; 1 DNSBL listing among 8 total lists

Threat Feeds: No known campaign associations

Tor/Proxy Status: Not a Tor exit node, proxy, or VPN

Abuse Confidence Score: Not scored

Critical Observation: No direct threat indicators despite moderate risk score. Risk appears driven by network-level factors.

## NEIGHBORHOOD ANALYSIS

Subnet Classification: HIGH_ABUSE

Abuse Density: 0.7344 (73.44% of subnet flagged)

Threat Siblings: 188 of 256 total IPs in /24

Active Siblings: 198 currently operational

Risk Distribution Across Subnet:

The /24 subnet exhibits concentrated abuse density, suggesting systematic misconfiguration or shared infrastructure risk rather than isolated malicious activity.

## OBSERVATION HISTORY

Total Observations: 21 signals

Temporal Analysis:

The IP has maintained consistent infrastructure characteristics throughout observation period with no escalation in threat profile.

## NETWORK RELATIONSHIPS

Primary Associations:

No unique correlation to known malicious infrastructure. Relationships indicate standard hosting infrastructure.

## RECOMMENDED ACTIONS

Based on risk profile and neighborhood context:

Immediate Blocking Rules:

WAF Integration:

Monitoring Context: Consider blocking entire /24 subnet if business permits, given 73.44% abuse density and 188 threat siblings. However, individual IP assessment recommended for least-privilege approach.

## INTELLIGENCE NOTES

1. Risk score of 40 driven primarily by high-abuse subnet density, not direct threat activity

2. Geolocation discrepancy (Canada vs Singapore) suggests potential routing manipulation or data inconsistency

3. No open ports detected indicates either legitimate firewalled service or dormant/abused infrastructure

4. DNS hostname suggests association with ahrefs.net (SEO tools service) โ€” verify legitimate business use before blocking

Analyst Decision Required: Block individual IP or subnet based on business impact analysis and threat tolerance.

---

*Intelligence generated via IPDebrief automated analysis. Validate against internal threat intelligence before implementing blocking rules.*

This summary was generated by AI and may contain inaccuracies. Verify critical details independently.

๐ŸŒ Geolocation

Country๐Ÿ‡จ๐Ÿ‡ฆ Canada
RegionQC
CitySingapore
Timezoneโ€”
Latitude45.51
Longitude-73.59

๐Ÿข Ownership & Registration

OrganizationDmytro, Ahrefs Pte Ltd
ASNAS16276
Network NameOVH-CUST-281059682
CIDR Block142.44.233.0/24
RIRARIN
CountrySingapore
Abuse Contactโ€”

๐ŸŒ DNS Intelligence

PTRproxy-ca003-san176.ahrefs.net
Forward ConfirmedNo โ€” PTR hostname does not resolve back to this IP (weak signal)
Forward Hostnamesproxy-ca003-san176.ahrefs.net

๐Ÿ” DNS Hygiene

Hygiene Score40% (Fair)
SPFNot configured
DMARCNot configured
FCrDNSNot verified
DNSSECValid
CAAPresent

โ˜๏ธ Network Classification

InfrastructureInfrastructure / Datacenter
Service PurposeFirewalled / No Services
Network TierHosting โ€” Infrastructure provider without advanced routing
CloudHosting

๐Ÿ”Œ Services & Open Ports

PortServiceProtocolBanner
No open ports detected
Closed Ports22, 25, 80, 443, 3389, 8080, 8443 (0 open / 7 scanned)
Serverโ€”
HTTP Titleโ€”

๐Ÿ” TLS Certificate

๐Ÿ”’
No certificate
Issued by โ€”
N/A
SANsNone
Valid Fromโ€”
Valid Untilโ€”

๐ŸŽฏ Confidence Breakdown

Per-dimension confidence scores based on source diversity and data freshness

DimensionScoreSourcesObservations
threat
31%
24
routing
13%
11
services
19%
22
ownership
19%
22
reputation
31%
13
geolocation
36%
23
Overall25%1015
Coverage: 6/6 dimensions ยท Data sufficiency: sufficient
Data CoherenceMostly Consistent (80%) โ€” 1 contradiction(s)
AttributionLow (35%)
OwnershipFCrDNSGeo ConsensusGeo PlausibleIRR MatchRPKI Valid
โš  Claimed geolocation contradicts RTT physics measurement

๐Ÿ“… Observation Timeline ๐Ÿ”„ Live

First Seen2026-05-29 12:04:13 UTC
Last Seen2026-06-29 06:20:04 UTC
Profile Built2026-06-29 12:23:42 UTC
Data FreshnessLive
Signal Types20
Total Observations22
๐Ÿ” 20 signal types ยท 22 observations collected
This report is generated from 20+ independent intelligence signals including ownership records, DNS analysis, BGP routing, TLS certificates, port scanning, threat feeds, behavioral fingerprinting, and more.
Full dossier details are available via our API.
{ } JSON API ๐Ÿ”ง Actions API ๐Ÿ“ง Enterprise Access

โ„น๏ธ About This Report

All data shown is publicly available network metadata โ€” IP addresses do not reliably identify individuals. Assessments are probabilistic and should not be used as sole basis for access control decisions. To report an issue or request data review, contact admin@ipdebrief.com.