IPDebrief

154.54.56.222

IP Intelligence Dossier
Your IP: 216.73.217.34
{ } JSON πŸ”§ Full Actions API
πŸ€– Witness AIThis summary was generated by AI and may contain inaccuracies. Verify critical details independently.

Between 2026-08-29 and 2026-09-23, IP 154.54.56.222 maintained a low-risk reputation score of 25. Ownership records identified the address within Cogent Communications, LLC (ASN 174, 154.54.0.0/16). Network scans revealed the host was firewalled with no open ports, TLS certificates, or active web services. Geolocation data presented contradictions; sources conflicted on the country of origin (US vs. GB), and Round-Trip Time (RTT) measurements of 95ms violated the minimum physical latency of 152.5ms for the reported distance. Despite these inconsistencies, the address appeared in a clean neighborhood with zero abuse density and zero blacklists. Behavioral analysis showed no honeypot hits or enumeration strikes. While the profile was labeled "Low Risk," the presence of signal contradictions and generic "Suspicious Host" tagging resulted in a low-severity monitor recommendation. No specific threat actors or campaigns were linked to the IP.

This summary was generated by AI and may contain inaccuracies. Verify critical details independently.

🌍 Geolocation

CountryπŸ‡ΊπŸ‡Έ United States
Regionβ€”
CityLondon
Timezoneβ€”
Latitudeβ€”
Longitudeβ€”

🏒 Ownership & Registration

OrganizationCogent Communications, LLC
ASNAS174
Network NameCOGENT-154-54-16
CIDR Block154.54.0.0/16
RIRAFRINIC
CountryUnited States
Abuse ContactAvailable via RDAP

🌐 DNS Intelligence

PTRbe3893.rcr61.rhe01.atlas.cogentco.com
Forward ConfirmedNo β€” PTR hostname does not resolve back to this IP (weak signal)
Forward Hostnamesbe3893.rcr61.rhe01.atlas.cogentco.com

πŸ” DNS Hygiene

Hygiene Score40% (Fair)
SPF2/2 domains
DMARC2/2 domains
FCrDNSNot verified
DNSSECNot signed
CAANot configured
Domains Checked2 domains

☁️ Network Classification

InfrastructureUnknown
Service PurposeFirewalled / No Services
Network TierTier 3 β€” Basic operator with some routing infrastructure
No specific classification

πŸ”Œ Services & Open Ports

PortServiceProtocolBanner
No open ports detected
Closed Ports22, 25, 80, 443, 3389, 8080, 8443 (0 open / 7 scanned)
Serverβ€”
HTTP Titleβ€”

πŸ” TLS Certificate

πŸ”’
No certificate
Issued by β€”
N/A
SANsNone
Valid Fromβ€”
Valid Untilβ€”

🎯 Confidence Breakdown

Per-dimension confidence scores based on source diversity and data freshness

DimensionScoreSourcesObservations
threat
36%
28
routing
13%
11
services
19%
22
ownership
27%
23
reputation
32%
15
geolocation
36%
28
Overall27%1027
Coverage: 6/6 dimensions Β· Data sufficiency: sufficient
Data CoherenceMixed Signals (60%) β€” 2 contradiction(s)
AttributionLow (35%)
OwnershipFCrDNSGeo ConsensusGeo PlausibleIRR MatchRPKI Valid
⚠ Claimed geolocation contradicts RTT physics measurement
⚠ Geo sources disagree on country: GB, US

πŸ“… Observation Timeline πŸ”„ Live

First Seen2026-08-29 11:21:18 UTC
Last Seen2026-09-23 08:48:59 UTC
Profile Built2026-09-23 09:24:09 UTC
Data FreshnessLive
Signal Types31
Total Observations52
πŸ” 31 signal types Β· 52 observations collected
This report is generated from 31+ independent intelligence signals including ownership records, DNS analysis, BGP routing, TLS certificates, port scanning, threat feeds, behavioral fingerprinting, and more.
Full dossier details are available via our API.
{ } JSON API πŸ”§ Actions API πŸ“§ Enterprise Access

ℹ️ About This Report

All data shown is publicly available network metadata β€” IP addresses do not reliably identify individuals. Assessments are probabilistic and should not be used as sole basis for access control decisions. To report an issue or request data review, contact admin@ipdebrief.com.