IPDebrief

163.61.38.135

IP Intelligence Dossier
Your IP: 216.73.216.123
{ } JSON ๐Ÿ”ง Full Actions API
๐Ÿค– Witness AIThis summary was generated by AI and may contain inaccuracies. Verify critical details independently.

# Intelligence Briefing: 163.61.38.135/32

Classification: Moderate Risk

Date: June 17, 2026

Analyst: IPDebrief Intelligence Platform

---

## Executive Summary

IP address 163.61.38.135 presents a moderate risk profile (Risk Score: 40/100) with no active threat indicators. The IP is associated with CHANDER PARKASH organization, registered under the JOYSVC network block within APNIC RIR. Geolocation analysis places the address in Noida, Uttar Pradesh, India. Despite the moderate risk classification, the IP shows no evidence of active malicious behavior, spam generation, or known campaign participation.

## Ownership and Geolocation

FieldValue
**ASN**152565
**Organization**CHANDER PARKASH
**Network Name**JOYSVC
**CIDR Block**163.61.38.0/24
**Country**India (IN)
**Region**Uttar Pradesh
**City**Noida
**RIR**APNIC

Geolocation confidence stands at 52% with an accuracy radius of 1,500 km. Multiple source signals confirmed geo-plausibility.

## Threat Assessment

Active Indicators

Control Plane Analysis

## Network Fingerprint

## Neighborhood Analysis

Subnet: 163.61.38.0/24

Abuse Density: 0%

Classification: Clean

MetricValue
Total Siblings2
Active Siblings1
Threat Siblings0
High Risk Neighbors0
Medium Risk Neighbors0
Low Risk Neighbors1

Notable Neighbor: 163.61.38.142 (Risk Score: 25)

## Relationship Graph

The IP demonstrates network-level relationships exclusively within the JOYSVC network block (163.61.38.0/24). No external organization, hostname, or certificate relationships were identified.

## Historical Observations

The IP has generated 20 observations over the monitoring period:

Recent signals indicate minimal activity with no escalation in risk profile.

## Recommended Actions

Given the moderate risk score (40) and lack of confirmed malicious indicators, the following firewall rules are recommended:

```bash

# iptables

iptables -A INPUT -s 163.61.38.135 -j DROP

# nftables

nft add rule inet filter input ip saddr 163.61.38.135 drop

# nginx

deny 163.61.38.135;

# pfSense

163.61.38.135/32

# Cloudflare WAF

{

"description": "Block 163.61.38.135 โ€” IPDebrief risk score 40",

"action": "block",

"filter": {

"expression": "ip.src eq 163.61.38.135"

}

}

# AWS WAF

{

"Addresses": ["163.61.38.135/32"],

"Description": "IPDebrief risk 40"

}

```

Note: These recommendations are probabilistic and should be combined with other signals before implementing blocking measures.

## Conclusion

IP 163.61.38.135 is classified as moderate risk but currently demonstrates no active threat behavior. The absence of open services, combined with clean neighborhood metrics and no blacklist presence, suggests this IP may be a legitimate infrastructure endpoint with firewall protections in place. SOC analysts should monitor for any changes in service availability or threat indicator emergence while considering the recommended blocking rules as a precautionary measure.

This summary was generated by AI and may contain inaccuracies. Verify critical details independently.

๐ŸŒ Geolocation

Country๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡ณ India
RegionUttar Pradesh
CityNoida
Timezoneโ€”
Latitude28.58
Longitude77.33

๐Ÿข Ownership & Registration

OrganizationCHANDER PARKASH
ASNAS152565
Network NameJOYSVC
CIDR Block163.61.38.0/24
RIRAPNIC
CountryIN
Abuse ContactAvailable via RDAP

๐ŸŒ DNS Intelligence

PTR RecordNo PTR
Forward ConfirmedNo โ€” PTR hostname does not resolve back to this IP (weak signal)

๐Ÿ” DNS Hygiene

Hygiene Score40% (Fair)
SPFPresent
DMARCNot configured
FCrDNSNot verified
DNSSECValid
CAANot configured

โ˜๏ธ Network Classification

InfrastructureUnknown
Service PurposeFirewalled / No Services
Network TierUnknown โ€” Insufficient routing data to classify
No specific classification

๐Ÿ”Œ Services & Open Ports

PortServiceProtocolBanner
No open ports detected
Closed Ports22, 25, 80, 443, 3389, 8080, 8443 (0 open / 7 scanned)
Servernginx/1.24.0
HTTP Titleโ€”

๐Ÿ” TLS Certificate

๐Ÿ”’
No certificate
Issued by โ€”
N/A
SANsNone
Valid Fromโ€”
Valid Untilโ€”

๐ŸŽฏ Confidence Breakdown

Per-dimension confidence scores based on source diversity and data freshness

DimensionScoreSourcesObservations
threat
26%
24
routing
13%
11
services
26%
23
ownership
27%
23
reputation
23%
13
geolocation
32%
23
Overall25%1017
Coverage: 6/6 dimensions ยท Data sufficiency: sufficient
Data CoherenceConsistent (100%)
AttributionModerate (50%)
OwnershipFCrDNSGeo ConsensusGeo PlausibleIRR MatchRPKI Valid

๐Ÿ“… Observation Timeline ๐Ÿ”„ Live

First Seen2026-05-07 23:03:50 UTC
Last Seen2026-06-22 19:27:46 UTC
Profile Built2026-06-22 19:34:25 UTC
Data FreshnessLive
Signal Types21
Total Observations22
๐Ÿ” 21 signal types ยท 22 observations collected
This report is generated from 21+ independent intelligence signals including ownership records, DNS analysis, BGP routing, TLS certificates, port scanning, threat feeds, behavioral fingerprinting, and more.
Full dossier details are available via our API.
{ } JSON API ๐Ÿ”ง Actions API ๐Ÿ“ง Enterprise Access

โ„น๏ธ About This Report

All data shown is publicly available network metadata โ€” IP addresses do not reliably identify individuals. Assessments are probabilistic and should not be used as sole basis for access control decisions. To report an issue or request data review, contact admin@ipdebrief.com.