165.22.82.165
IP Intelligence Dossier
Your IP: 216.73.216.123
🤖 Witness AIThis summary was generated by AI and may contain inaccuracies. Verify critical details independently.
IP Intelligence Briefing: 165.22.82.165
Date: 2026-06-07
---
**1. Core Profile**
- Risk Score: Moderate (50/100)
- Provider: DigitalOcean, LLC (ASN 14061)
- Geolocation: Frankfurt am Main, Germany (US-based infrastructure)
- Network Role: Cloud compute instance (DigitalOcean)
- Services: Open SSH (port 22) with banner "SSH-2.0-OpenSSH_9.6p1". No TLS or HTTP services detected.
---
**2. Threat Indicators**
- No malicious activity detected: No indicators of compromise (IOCs), spam, or abuse.
- DNS/Email: No DNS records or email authentication (SPF/DKIM) found.
- BGP: Stable route with no recent changes.
---
**3. Observation History**
- Last 30 days:
- Single scan detected (June 7, 2026) showing open SSH ports.
- No persistent threats or campaign correlations.
- Geolocation consistency (Frankfurt, Germany).
---
**4. Network Relationships**
- Linked Entities:
- Part of DigitalOcean’s 165.22.80.0/20 subnet.
- No connections to known malicious domains, organizations, or certificates.
---
**5. Subnet Analysis**
- Subnet: 165.22.82.165/24
- Neighbor Risk: No neighboring IPs detected (likely isolated host).
- Abuse Density: 0% (clean subnet).
---
**6. Recommendations**
- Monitor SSH access: Ensure SSH keys are restricted and audit login attempts.
- Baseline behavior: Track port 22 activity for anomalies (e.g., unexpected connections).
- No immediate action required: No malicious indicators or network risks detected.
---
Source: IPDebrief Threat Intelligence Platform
This summary was generated by AI and may contain inaccuracies. Verify critical details independently.
🏢 Ownership & Registration
| Organization | DigitalOcean, LLC |
| ASN | AS14061 |
| Network Name | — |
| CIDR Block | — |
| RIR | ARIN |
| Country | — |
| Abuse Contact | Available via RDAP |
🌐 DNS Intelligence
| PTR Record | No PTR |
| Forward Confirmed | No — PTR hostname does not resolve back to this IP (weak signal) |
🔐 DNS Hygiene
| Hygiene Score | 40% (Fair) |
| SPF | Not configured |
| DMARC | Not configured |
| FCrDNS | Not verified |
| DNSSEC | Valid |
| CAA | Present |
☁️ Network Classification
| Infrastructure | Infrastructure / Datacenter |
| Service Purpose | Single-Service Host |
| Network Tier | Hosting — Infrastructure provider without advanced routing |
🔌 Services & Open Ports
| Port | Service | Protocol | Banner |
|---|---|---|---|
| 22 | ssh | tcp | |
| Closed Ports | 25, 80, 443, 3389, 8080, 8443 (1 open / 7 scanned) | ||
| Server | — |
| HTTP Title | — |
| SSH Version | SSH-2.0-OpenSSH_9.6p1 Ubuntu-3ubuntu13.16 |
🔐 TLS Certificate
No certificate
Issued by —
N/A
| SANs | None |
| Valid From | — |
| Valid Until | — |
🎯 Confidence Breakdown
Per-dimension confidence scores based on source diversity and data freshness
| Dimension | Score | Sources | Observations |
|---|---|---|---|
| threat | 29% | 2 | 4 |
| routing | 8% | 1 | 1 |
| services | 20% | 2 | 3 |
| ownership | 17% | 2 | 3 |
| reputation | 28% | 1 | 3 |
| geolocation | 27% | 2 | 3 |
| Overall | 22% | 10 | 17 |
Coverage: 6/6 dimensions · Data sufficiency: sufficient
| Data Coherence | Mostly Consistent (80%) — 1 contradiction(s) |
| Attribution | Low (35%) |
| OwnershipFCrDNSGeo ConsensusGeo PlausibleIRR MatchRPKI Valid |
⚠ Geo sources disagree on country: DE, US
📅 Observation Timeline 🔄 Live
| First Seen | 2026-05-14 23:35:00 UTC |
| Last Seen | 2026-06-28 01:39:21 UTC |
| Profile Built | 2026-06-28 20:17:17 UTC |
| Data Freshness | Live |
| Signal Types | 23 |
| Total Observations | 27 |
🔍 23 signal types · 27 observations collected
This report is generated from 23+ independent intelligence signals including
ownership records, DNS analysis, BGP routing, TLS certificates, port scanning, threat feeds,
behavioral fingerprinting, and more.
Full dossier details are available via our API.
Full dossier details are available via our API.
ℹ️ About This Report
All data shown is publicly available network metadata — IP addresses do not reliably identify individuals.
Assessments are probabilistic and should not be used as sole basis for access control decisions.
To report an issue or request data review, contact admin@ipdebrief.com.