Your IP: 216.73.216.123
π€ Witness AIThis summary was generated by AI and may contain inaccuracies. Verify critical details independently.
Threat Intelligence Briefing for IP 165.245.188.9
Date: 2026-06-13
---
**1. Core Profile**
- Risk Score: 30 (Low Risk)
- Provider: DigitalOcean, LLC (ASN 14061)
- Geolocation: Singapore (SG), Latitude 1.35, Longitude 103.82
- Network Role: CloudCompute (DigitalOcean infrastructure)
- Services: HTTP (80), HTTPS (443), SSH (22), HTTP-alt (8080)
- Threat Indicators: No malicious activity detected (no blacklists, campaigns, or abuse reports).
---
**2. Observation History**
- Risk Trends: Minimal risk observed over the past 30 days.
- DNSSEC: Validated (no DNS tampering detected).
- Route Stability: Route changes: 0 in 30 days; stable.
- TLS/HTTP: No certificate anomalies; HTTP banners indicate standard OpenSSH.
---
**3. Relationships & Network Context**
- Linked Networks: Same network (DO-13, DigitalOcean).
- Subnet Analysis:
- /24 Subnet: 165.245.188.0/24.
- Abuse Density: 0% (no malicious IPs in subnet).
- Neighbors: No sibling IPs found (likely due to /32 subnet).
---
**4. Security Actions**
- Recommended Rules: None required (low-risk asset).
- Firewall: No actionable rules needed for iptables/nftables/WAF.
---
**5. SOC Guidance**
- Monitor: Track for unexpected service changes (e.g., new ports, TLS certificates).
- Verify: Confirm SSH banners and HTTP server identities during connectivity checks.
- Context: Legitimate cloud server; no evidence of C2, data exfiltration, or exploitation.
Conclusion: This IP is a standard DigitalOcean cloud instance with no malicious signals. No immediate defensive action required.
This summary was generated by AI and may contain inaccuracies. Verify critical details independently.
π’ Ownership & Registration
| Organization | DigitalOcean, LLC |
| ASN | AS14061 |
| Network Name | β |
| CIDR Block | β |
| RIR | ARIN |
| Country | β |
| Abuse Contact | Available via RDAP |
π DNS Intelligence
| PTR Record | No PTR |
| Forward Confirmed | No β PTR hostname does not resolve back to this IP (weak signal) |
π DNS Hygiene
| Hygiene Score | 20% (Poor) |
| SPF | Not configured |
| DMARC | Not configured |
| FCrDNS | Not verified |
| DNSSEC | Valid |
| CAA | Not configured |
βοΈ Network Classification
| Infrastructure | Infrastructure / Datacenter |
| Service Purpose | Web Server |
| Network Tier | Hosting β Infrastructure provider without advanced routing |
π Services & Open Ports
| Port | Service | Protocol | Banner |
|---|---|---|---|
| 80 | http | tcp | β |
| 443 | https | tcp | β |
| 22 | ssh | tcp | |
| 8080 | http-alt | tcp | β |
| Closed Ports | 25, 3389, 8443 (4 open / 7 scanned) | ||
| Server | β |
| HTTP Title | β |
| SSH Version | SSH-2.0-OpenSSH_8.2p1 Ubuntu-4ubuntu0.5 |
π TLS Certificate
No certificate
Issued by β
N/A
| SANs | None |
| Valid From | β |
| Valid Until | β |
π― Confidence Breakdown
Per-dimension confidence scores based on source diversity and data freshness
| Dimension | Score | Sources | Observations |
|---|---|---|---|
| threat | 39% | 2 | 5 |
| routing | 8% | 1 | 1 |
| services | 25% | 2 | 3 |
| ownership | 20% | 2 | 3 |
| reputation | 27% | 1 | 3 |
| geolocation | 35% | 2 | 3 |
| Overall | 26% | 10 | 18 |
Coverage: 6/6 dimensions Β· Data sufficiency: sufficient
| Data Coherence | Consistent (100%) |
| Attribution | Moderate (50%) |
| OwnershipFCrDNSGeo ConsensusGeo PlausibleIRR MatchRPKI Valid |
π Observation Timeline π Live
| First Seen | 2026-05-07 23:03:51 UTC |
| Last Seen | 2026-06-27 01:20:26 UTC |
| Profile Built | 2026-06-28 01:16:27 UTC |
| Data Freshness | Live |
| Signal Types | 20 |
| Total Observations | 29 |
π 20 signal types Β· 29 observations collected
This report is generated from 20+ independent intelligence signals including
ownership records, DNS analysis, BGP routing, TLS certificates, port scanning, threat feeds,
behavioral fingerprinting, and more.
Full dossier details are available via our API.
Full dossier details are available via our API.
βΉοΈ About This Report
All data shown is publicly available network metadata β IP addresses do not reliably identify individuals.
Assessments are probabilistic and should not be used as sole basis for access control decisions.
To report an issue or request data review, contact admin@ipdebrief.com.