Your IP: 216.73.216.123
π€ Witness AIThis summary was generated by AI and may contain inaccuracies. Verify critical details independently.
IP Intelligence Briefing: 172.173.121.85/32
*Generated via IPDebrief tools: Profile, History, Relationships, Neighbors, Actions*
---
**Overview**
- Risk Score: 25 (Low Risk)
- Provider: Microsoft Azure (CloudCompute)
- Geolocation: Des Moines, IA, US (latitude 41.6, longitude -93.61)
- Ownership: ASN 8075 (Divya Quamara)
- Network Role: Hosting / Firewalled (No open services detected)
---
**Threat Indicators**
- No malicious activity: No indicators of spam, attacks, or known campaigns.
- DNS/Services: No resolved domains, open ports, or TLS certificates.
- Subnet Abuse: Subnet 172.173.121.0/24 has 0 abuse density (clean).
---
**Observation History**
- Recent Signal (2026-06-13):
- Conflicting geolocation data (Germany, DE) with 75% confidence.
- Threat pulse count: 2 (unverified).
- Likely false positive or misattribution; current profile confirms US location.
---
**Relationships**
- Network: Linked to Microsoft Azure cloud infrastructure.
- No direct connections: No associated domains, certificates, or subnets.
---
**Neighborhood Analysis**
- /24 Subnet: 172.173.121.0/24 has no active or threatening sibling IPs.
- Abuse Density: 0% (subnet is mostly clean).
---
**Recommended Actions**
- No immediate action required: Low risk profile and no active threats.
- Verify Geolocation Discrepancy: Investigate the Germany signal (DE) for potential misattribution.
- Monitor Subnet: Track 172.173.121.0/24 for future anomalies.
---
Conclusion: This IP is a legitimate Azure-hosted cloud instance with no current malicious activity. The conflicting geolocation signal warrants further investigation, but the overall risk remains low.
This summary was generated by AI and may contain inaccuracies. Verify critical details independently.
π’ Ownership & Registration
| Organization | Divya Quamara |
| ASN | AS8075 |
| Network Name | β |
| CIDR Block | β |
| RIR | ARIN |
| Country | β |
| Abuse Contact | Available via RDAP |
π DNS Intelligence
| PTR Record | No PTR |
| Forward Confirmed | No β PTR hostname does not resolve back to this IP (weak signal) |
π DNS Hygiene
| Hygiene Score | 20% (Poor) |
| SPF | Not configured |
| DMARC | Not configured |
| FCrDNS | Not verified |
| DNSSEC | Valid |
| CAA | Not configured |
βοΈ Network Classification
| Infrastructure | Infrastructure / Datacenter |
| Service Purpose | Firewalled / No Services |
| Network Tier | Hosting β Infrastructure provider without advanced routing |
π Services & Open Ports
| Port | Service | Protocol | Banner |
|---|---|---|---|
| No open ports detected | |||
| Server | β |
| HTTP Title | β |
π TLS Certificate
No certificate
Issued by β
N/A
| SANs | None |
| Valid From | β |
| Valid Until | β |
π― Confidence Breakdown
Per-dimension confidence scores based on source diversity and data freshness
| Dimension | Score | Sources | Observations |
|---|---|---|---|
| threat | 24% | 2 | 3 |
| routing | 8% | 1 | 1 |
| services | 8% | 1 | 1 |
| ownership | 24% | 2 | 3 |
| reputation | 26% | 1 | 3 |
| geolocation | 30% | 2 | 3 |
| Overall | 20% | 9 | 14 |
Coverage: 6/6 dimensions Β· Data sufficiency: sufficient
| Data Coherence | Mostly Consistent (80%) β 1 contradiction(s) |
| Attribution | Low (35%) |
| OwnershipFCrDNSGeo ConsensusGeo PlausibleIRR MatchRPKI Valid |
β Geo sources disagree on country: DE, US
π Observation Timeline π Live
| First Seen | 2026-05-07 23:03:54 UTC |
| Last Seen | 2026-06-27 01:52:21 UTC |
| Profile Built | 2026-06-27 19:58:01 UTC |
| Data Freshness | Live |
| Signal Types | 17 |
| Total Observations | 22 |
π 17 signal types Β· 22 observations collected
This report is generated from 17+ independent intelligence signals including
ownership records, DNS analysis, BGP routing, TLS certificates, port scanning, threat feeds,
behavioral fingerprinting, and more.
Full dossier details are available via our API.
Full dossier details are available via our API.
βΉοΈ About This Report
All data shown is publicly available network metadata β IP addresses do not reliably identify individuals.
Assessments are probabilistic and should not be used as sole basis for access control decisions.
To report an issue or request data review, contact admin@ipdebrief.com.