Your IP: 216.73.216.123
π€ Witness AIThis summary was generated by AI and may contain inaccuracies. Verify critical details independently.
IP Intelligence Briefing: 172.208.127.201
Date: 2026-06-12
---
**1. Core Profile**
- Risk Score: 25 (Low Risk)
- Ownership: Registered to Divya Quamara under ASN 8075 (Microsoft Azure).
- Geolocation: US (Massachusetts, Boston). Coordinates and timezone data incomplete.
- Network Role: Microsoft Azure cloud compute instance (firewalled, no exposed services).
- Threat Indicators: No malicious activity, spam, or known attacker associations.
---
**2. Observation History**
- Stability: No significant changes in risk or network behavior over 14 observations.
- DNSSEC: Validated (no tampering detected).
- BGP: Prefix 172.208.0.0/13 managed by Microsoft, with no route instability.
---
**3. Relationships & Neighbors**
- Network Connections: Linked to Microsoft Azure infrastructure (same subnet: 172.208.127.0/24).
- Subnet Abuse Density: 0% (clean subnet).
- Neighbors:
- 172.208.127.243 (riskScore: 0, authorityScore: 50).
---
**4. Threat Context**
- No Malicious Activity: No DNS, TLS, or service anomalies.
- Cloud Environment: Likely a virtual machine/container in Azure with no exposed ports.
- Neighbor Risk: Single neighbor with moderate authority score; no immediate threat.
---
**5. Recommendations**
- Monitor Subnet: Track 172.208.127.0/24 for unexpected changes.
- Access Controls: Ensure Azure resources are segmented and access is restricted.
- Verify Neighbor: Investigate 172.208.127.243 if unusual traffic is observed.
Conclusion: Legitimate Microsoft Azure infrastructure. No actionable threats detected. Maintain standard cloud security hygiene.
---
*Generated by IPDebrief threat intelligence platform.*
This summary was generated by AI and may contain inaccuracies. Verify critical details independently.
π’ Ownership & Registration
| Organization | Divya Quamara |
| ASN | AS8075 |
| Network Name | cloud |
| CIDR Block | 172.208.0.0/16 |
| RIR | ARIN |
| Country | US |
| Abuse Contact | Available via RDAP |
π DNS Intelligence
| PTR Record | No PTR |
| Forward Confirmed | No β PTR hostname does not resolve back to this IP (weak signal) |
π DNS Hygiene
| Hygiene Score | 20% (Poor) |
| SPF | Not configured |
| DMARC | Not configured |
| FCrDNS | Not verified |
| DNSSEC | Valid |
| CAA | Not configured |
βοΈ Network Classification
| Infrastructure | Infrastructure / Datacenter |
| Service Purpose | Firewalled / No Services |
| Network Tier | Hosting β Infrastructure provider without advanced routing |
π Services & Open Ports
| Port | Service | Protocol | Banner |
|---|---|---|---|
| No open ports detected | |||
| Closed Ports | 22, 25, 80, 443, 3389, 8080, 8443 (0 open / 7 scanned) | ||
| Server | β |
| HTTP Title | β |
π TLS Certificate
No certificate
Issued by β
N/A
| SANs | None |
| Valid From | β |
| Valid Until | β |
π― Confidence Breakdown
Per-dimension confidence scores based on source diversity and data freshness
| Dimension | Score | Sources | Observations |
|---|---|---|---|
| threat | 19% | 2 | 2 |
| routing | 13% | 1 | 1 |
| services | 21% | 2 | 2 |
| ownership | 27% | 2 | 3 |
| reputation | 15% | 1 | 2 |
| geolocation | 27% | 2 | 2 |
| Overall | 20% | 10 | 12 |
Coverage: 6/6 dimensions Β· Data sufficiency: sufficient
| Data Coherence | Consistent (100%) |
| Attribution | Moderate (50%) |
| OwnershipFCrDNSGeo ConsensusGeo PlausibleIRR MatchRPKI Valid |
π Observation Timeline π Live
| First Seen | 2026-06-03 00:12:42 UTC |
| Last Seen | 2026-06-21 09:21:59 UTC |
| Profile Built | 2026-06-21 09:33:28 UTC |
| Data Freshness | Live |
| Signal Types | 19 |
| Total Observations | 21 |
π 19 signal types Β· 21 observations collected
This report is generated from 19+ independent intelligence signals including
ownership records, DNS analysis, BGP routing, TLS certificates, port scanning, threat feeds,
behavioral fingerprinting, and more.
Full dossier details are available via our API.
Full dossier details are available via our API.
βΉοΈ About This Report
All data shown is publicly available network metadata β IP addresses do not reliably identify individuals.
Assessments are probabilistic and should not be used as sole basis for access control decisions.
To report an issue or request data review, contact admin@ipdebrief.com.