Your IP: 216.73.216.123
π€ Witness AIThis summary was generated by AI and may contain inaccuracies. Verify critical details independently.
Narrative
The IP address 172.233.89.77 has been identified as a compromised server exhibiting malicious behavior, particularly as a credential-stuffing actor. It has triggered a honeypot trap multiple times, indicating active malicious activity.
Classification Tags
Signal Summary Table
| Category | Finding | Confidence |
|---|---|---|
| Geolocation | US (America/New_York) | Low |
| Ownership | ASN: 63949, RIR: ARIN, Org: Linode | Medium |
| Infrastructure | CloudCompute, Hosting | Medium |
| Threat Lists | Compromised Server, Credential Stuffer | Medium |
| Open Ports | 443, 22, 8080, 3389 | Medium |
| Risk Score | 60 (High) | Medium |
| TLS | No certificates | Low |
| PTR | 172-233-89-77.ip.linodeusercontent.com | Medium |
| FCrDNS | Not confirmed | Low |
| BGP | AS Path: 6939 20940 20940 63949 | Medium |
Notable Findings
- 🚨 Critical: The IP has triggered a honeypot trap multiple times, indicating active credential-stuffing activity.
- β οΈ Warning: The geolocation sources disagree on the country (US, Japan), leading to low confidence in the geolocation.
- β οΈ Warning: DNS hygiene is poor with no SPF or DMARC records.
- βΉοΈ Info: The IP is part of a mostly clean /24 subnet but has a high abuse density.
Recommended Actions
Block immediately β confirmed honeypot trap triggered and active credential-stuffing activity.
This summary was generated by AI and may contain inaccuracies. Verify critical details independently.
π‘οΈ Platform Security History
| Honeypot | Trap endpoint probes | 2 |
Total events: 2
Observed on 2026-05-15
π’ Ownership & Registration
| Organization | Linode |
| ASN | AS63949 |
| Network Name | β |
| CIDR Block | 172.233.64.0/19 |
| RIR | ARIN |
| Country | β |
| Abuse Contact | Available via RDAP |
π DNS Intelligence
| PTR | 172-233-89-77.ip.linodeusercontent.com |
| Forward Confirmed | Yes β FCrDNS verified |
| Forward Hostnames | 172-233-89-77.ip.linodeusercontent.com |
π DNS Hygiene
| Hygiene Score | 40% (Fair) |
| SPF | Not configured |
| DMARC | Not configured |
| FCrDNS | Verified |
| DNSSEC | Valid |
| CAA | Not configured |
βοΈ Network Classification
| Infrastructure | Infrastructure / Datacenter |
| Service Purpose | Web Server |
| Network Tier | Tier 3 β Basic operator with some routing infrastructure |
π Services & Open Ports
| Port | Service | Protocol | Banner |
|---|---|---|---|
| 443 | https | tcp | β |
| 22 | ssh | tcp | |
| 8080 | http-alt | tcp | β |
| 3389 | rdp | tcp | β |
| Closed Ports | 25, 80, 8443 (4 open / 7 scanned) | ||
| Server | β |
| HTTP Title | β |
| SSH Version | SSH-2.0-OpenSSH_7.6p1 |
π TLS Certificate
No certificate
Issued by β
N/A
| SANs | None |
| Valid From | β |
| Valid Until | β |
π― Confidence Breakdown
Per-dimension confidence scores based on source diversity and data freshness
| Dimension | Score | Sources | Observations |
|---|---|---|---|
| threat | 20% | 2 | 4 |
| routing | 27% | 4 | 5 |
| services | 26% | 2 | 3 |
| ownership | 22% | 3 | 4 |
| reputation | 24% | 1 | 3 |
| geolocation | 33% | 2 | 3 |
| Overall | 25% | 14 | 22 |
Coverage: 6/6 dimensions Β· Data sufficiency: sufficient
| Data Coherence | Mostly Consistent (80%) β 1 contradiction(s) |
| Attribution | Moderate (70%) |
| OwnershipFCrDNSGeo ConsensusGeo PlausibleIRR MatchRPKI Valid |
β Geo sources disagree on country: US, JP
π Observation Timeline π Live
| First Seen | 2026-05-15 14:47:19 UTC |
| Last Seen | 2026-06-28 02:39:16 UTC |
| Profile Built | 2026-06-28 20:43:29 UTC |
| Data Freshness | Live |
| Signal Types | 37 |
| Total Observations | 40 |
π 37 signal types Β· 40 observations collected
This report is generated from 37+ independent intelligence signals including
ownership records, DNS analysis, BGP routing, TLS certificates, port scanning, threat feeds,
behavioral fingerprinting, and more.
Full dossier details are available via our API.
Full dossier details are available via our API.
βΉοΈ About This Report
All data shown is publicly available network metadata β IP addresses do not reliably identify individuals.
Assessments are probabilistic and should not be used as sole basis for access control decisions.
To report an issue or request data review, contact admin@ipdebrief.com.