IPDebrief

176.103.0.208

IP Intelligence Dossier
Your IP: 216.73.217.131
{ } JSON 🔧 Full Actions API
🤖 Witness AIThis summary was generated by AI and may contain inaccuracies. Verify critical details independently.

# IP Intelligence Briefing: 176.103.0.208/32

Classification: Low Risk | Report Date: 2026-07-27 | Status: Active Monitoring

---

## Executive Summary

IP address 176.103.0.208 is a low-risk endpoint associated with DIALOG-NET (ASN 56812), a RIPE-regulated network block (176.103.0.0/19). The IP exhibits no active threat indicators, maintains a reputation score of 30, and shows no evidence of malicious activity. Geographic validation indicates the IP resolves to London, United Kingdom, though some latency measurements suggest routing inconsistencies.

---

## Network Ownership & Infrastructure

AttributeValue
**ASN**56812
**Organization**DIALOGKOM-MNT / DIALOG-NET
**CIDR Block**176.103.0.0/19
**RIR**RIPE
**Country**GB (United Kingdom)
**City**London
**Registration**Unknown

Control Plane Data:

---

## Threat Assessment

Current Risk Profile:

Threat Feed Analysis:

DNS & Email Reputation:

---

## Network Services Analysis

Service Status:

Network Role Classification:

---

## Geographic Validation

Geolocation Data:

Network Latency:

---

## Neighborhood Analysis (176.103.0.0/24)

Subnet Overview:

Risk Distribution in /24:

Notable High-Risk Neighbors:

IP AddressRisk ScoreAuthority Score
176.103.0.216550
176.103.0.195550
176.103.0.94050
176.103.0.234050
176.103.0.264050

---

## Historical Observation Timeline

Observation Count: 17 signals recorded

Key Historical Indicators:

---

## Recommendations

Current Status: No immediate action required. The IP maintains a low-risk profile with no active threat indicators.

Monitoring Considerations:

1. The IP is geographically inconsistent (UK registration with Ukraine coordinates) - monitor for reputation changes

2. Route stability flagged as unstable - verify BGP routing if this IP is critical

3. 2 DNSBL listings detected - investigate specific blacklist reasons if traffic is affected

4. Two high-risk neighbors in the same /24 subnet - monitor for correlated activity

Firewall/Blocking Decision: Based on current risk profile (30/100), no blocking or restrictive rules recommended. Continue standard monitoring practices.

---

Data Sources: IPDebrief Intelligence Platform | Analysis Toolset: Full Profile, History, Relationships, Neighborhood, Actions

Disclaimer: This briefing is based on intelligence data as of 2026-07-27. Risk assessments should be combined with local

context. Analysts should correlate this intelligence with internal traffic patterns, alert thresholds, and operational requirements before making enforcement decisions.

---

## Metadata

FieldValue
**Report ID**IP-2026-07-27-176.103.0.208
**Generated By**IPDebrief Intelligence Platform
**Data Freshness**Real-time
**Confidence Level**Medium (2026-07-27)
**Review Status**Auto-generated

Distribution: SOC Team, Threat Intelligence Analysts

Classification: Internal Use Only

Retention: 90 Days

---

*End of Intelligence Briefing*

This summary was generated by AI and may contain inaccuracies. Verify critical details independently.

🌍 Geolocation

Country🇬🇧 United Kingdom
RegionKharkivs’ka Oblast’
CityLondon
TimezoneEurope/London
Latitude49.46
Longitude36.87

🏢 Ownership & Registration

OrganizationDIALOGKOM-MNT
ASNAS56812
Network NameDIALOG-NET
CIDR Block176.103.0.0/19
RIRRIPE
CountryUA
Abuse ContactAvailable via RDAP

🌐 DNS Intelligence

PTR RecordNo PTR
Forward ConfirmedNo — PTR hostname does not resolve back to this IP (weak signal)

🔐 DNS Hygiene

Hygiene Score20% (Poor)
SPFNot configured
DMARCNot configured
FCrDNSNot verified
DNSSECValid
CAANot configured

☁️ Network Classification

InfrastructureUnknown
Service PurposeFirewalled / No Services
Network TierUnknown — Insufficient routing data to classify
No specific classification

🔌 Services & Open Ports

PortServiceProtocolBanner
No open ports detected
Closed Ports22, 25, 80, 443, 3389, 8080, 8443 (0 open / 7 scanned)
Server—
HTTP Title—

🔐 TLS Certificate

🔒
No certificate
Issued by —
N/A
SANsNone
Valid From—
Valid Until—

🛡️ Public Network Snapshot

Origin ASNAS56812
Network Prefix176.103.0.0/20
Route mappingFound

🎯 Confidence Breakdown

Per-dimension confidence scores based on source diversity and data freshness

DimensionScoreSourcesObservations
threat
0%
00
routing
0%
00
services
0%
00
ownership
0%
00
reputation
0%
00
geolocation
25%
11
Overall4%11
Coverage: 1/6 dimensions · Data sufficiency: partial
Data CoherenceMostly Consistent (80%) — 1 contradiction(s)
AttributionLow (35%)
OwnershipFCrDNSGeo ConsensusGeo PlausibleIRR MatchRPKI Valid
⚠ Geo sources disagree on country: UA, GB

📅 Observation Timeline 🔄 Live

First Seen2026-07-15 04:05:46 UTC
Last Seen2026-09-02 14:49:00 UTC
Profile Built2026-08-31 19:31:29 UTC
Data FreshnessLive
Signal Types19
Total Observations22
🔍 19 signal types · 22 observations collected
This report is generated from 19+ independent intelligence signals including ownership records, DNS analysis, BGP routing, TLS certificates, port scanning, threat feeds, behavioral fingerprinting, and more.
Full dossier details are available via our API.
{ } JSON API 🔧 Actions API 📧 Enterprise Access

❓ Frequently Asked Questions About 176.103.0.208

Who owns the IP address 176.103.0.208?

176.103.0.208 is registered to DIALOGKOM-MNT. The address falls within the 176.103.0.0/19 network block. Registration is held at RIPE.

Where is 176.103.0.208 located?

Geolocation data places 176.103.0.208 in London, Kharkivs’ka Oblast’, United Kingdom. The local time zone is Europe/London. IP geolocation is approximate and indicates the network's registered or routed location rather than a precise physical address.

Is 176.103.0.208 malicious or safe?

176.103.0.208 currently carries a moderate risk assessment, meaning some indicators warrant caution, but the evidence is mixed. This assessment is generated from continuously collected signals and can change over time.

🏘️ Related IP Addresses

Nearby addresses in 176.103.0.0/19

Browse related networks

ℹ️ About This Report

All data shown is publicly available network metadata — IP addresses do not reliably identify individuals. Assessments are probabilistic and should not be used as sole basis for access control decisions. To report an issue or request data review, contact admin@ipdebrief.com.