# IP Intelligence Briefing: 176.103.0.208/32
Classification: Low Risk | Report Date: 2026-07-27 | Status: Active Monitoring
---
## Executive Summary
IP address 176.103.0.208 is a low-risk endpoint associated with DIALOG-NET (ASN 56812), a RIPE-regulated network block (176.103.0.0/19). The IP exhibits no active threat indicators, maintains a reputation score of 30, and shows no evidence of malicious activity. Geographic validation indicates the IP resolves to London, United Kingdom, though some latency measurements suggest routing inconsistencies.
---
## Network Ownership & Infrastructure
| Attribute | Value |
|---|---|
| **ASN** | 56812 |
| **Organization** | DIALOGKOM-MNT / DIALOG-NET |
| **CIDR Block** | 176.103.0.0/19 |
| **RIR** | RIPE |
| **Country** | GB (United Kingdom) |
| **City** | London |
| **Registration** | Unknown |
Control Plane Data:
- BGP Prefix: 176.103.0.0/20
- Route Stability: Unstable (false)
- DNSSEC: Valid
- DNSBL Listings: 2 of 8 total lists
- RPKI State: Not reported
---
## Threat Assessment
Current Risk Profile:
- Risk Score: 30/100 (Low Risk)
- Reputation: Low Risk
- Abuse Confidence Score: Not available
- Threat Indicators: None detected
Threat Feed Analysis:
- Is Tor Exit Node: No
- Is Known Attacker: No
- Is Spam Source: No
- Blacklist Count: 0
- Known Campaigns: None
- Campaign Likelihood: None
DNS & Email Reputation:
- PTR Hostnames: None
- Forward Resolution: Not confirmed
- Hosted Domains: 0
- SPF Record: Not present
- DMARC Record: Not present
- TXT Record Count: 0
---
## Network Services Analysis
Service Status:
- Open Ports: None detected
- TLS Certificate: Not observed
- HTTP Title: Not observed
- Server Banner: Not observed
- Classification: Firewalled / No Services
Network Role Classification:
- Provider: No
- CDN: No
- VPN: No
- Proxy: No
- Tor: No
- Hosting: No
- Mobile: No
- Residential: No
- Bogon: No
- Anycast: No
- Cloud: No
---
## Geographic Validation
Geolocation Data:
- Country: United Kingdom (GB)
- Region: Kharkivs'ka Oblast' (data inconsistency noted)
- City: London
- Claimed Latitude/Longitude: 49.4596, 36.869 (Ukraine coordinates)
- Distance from Claimed Location: 2,128.6 km
- Geographic Plausibility: Yes
- Geo Consensus: False (multiple sources disagree)
- Geo Source Count: 2
Network Latency:
- Minimum Possible RTT: 42.57 ms
- Minimum Observed RTT: Unable to validate (ICMP blocked)
- Hop Count: 29
- Transit Networks: Comcast, Cogent
---
## Neighborhood Analysis (176.103.0.0/24)
Subnet Overview:
- Total Siblings: 72 IPs
- Abuse Density: 2.8% (0.028)
- Classification: Mostly Clean
- Inherited Risk: 2
Risk Distribution in /24:
- High Risk: 2 IPs
- Medium Risk: 49 IPs
- Low Risk: 20 IPs
Notable High-Risk Neighbors:
| IP Address | Risk Score | Authority Score |
|---|---|---|
| 176.103.0.21 | 65 | 50 |
| 176.103.0.19 | 55 | 50 |
| 176.103.0.9 | 40 | 50 |
| 176.103.0.23 | 40 | 50 |
| 176.103.0.26 | 40 | 50 |
---
## Historical Observation Timeline
Observation Count: 17 signals recorded
Key Historical Indicators:
- Signal Type 5 (Network Role): Observed 2026-07-27 20:12:16 UTC - Confidence 0.30 - Classification: Not CDN/Tor/VPN/Proxy/Cloud/Hosting/Proxy/Mobile/Bogon/Anycast
- Signal Type 17 (Traceroute): Observed 2026-07-27 20:11:16 UTC - Confidence 0.75 - Total hops: 29, target not reached
- Signal Type 10 (Ownership): Observed 2026-07-27 20:11:08 UTC - Confidence 0.85 - No ownership changes, 0 threat observations
- Signal Type 14 (Campaign): Observed 2026-07-27 20:10:41 UTC - Confidence 0.30 - Campaign likelihood: None, 0 cert matches
- Signal Type 11 (Geolocation): Observed 2026-07-27 20:08:34 UTC - Confidence 0.50 - ICMP blocked, unable to validate
---
## Recommendations
Current Status: No immediate action required. The IP maintains a low-risk profile with no active threat indicators.
Monitoring Considerations:
1. The IP is geographically inconsistent (UK registration with Ukraine coordinates) - monitor for reputation changes
2. Route stability flagged as unstable - verify BGP routing if this IP is critical
3. 2 DNSBL listings detected - investigate specific blacklist reasons if traffic is affected
4. Two high-risk neighbors in the same /24 subnet - monitor for correlated activity
Firewall/Blocking Decision: Based on current risk profile (30/100), no blocking or restrictive rules recommended. Continue standard monitoring practices.
---
Data Sources: IPDebrief Intelligence Platform | Analysis Toolset: Full Profile, History, Relationships, Neighborhood, Actions
Disclaimer: This briefing is based on intelligence data as of 2026-07-27. Risk assessments should be combined with local
context. Analysts should correlate this intelligence with internal traffic patterns, alert thresholds, and operational requirements before making enforcement decisions.
---
## Metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
| **Report ID** | IP-2026-07-27-176.103.0.208 |
| **Generated By** | IPDebrief Intelligence Platform |
| **Data Freshness** | Real-time |
| **Confidence Level** | Medium (2026-07-27) |
| **Review Status** | Auto-generated |
Distribution: SOC Team, Threat Intelligence Analysts
Classification: Internal Use Only
Retention: 90 Days
---
*End of Intelligence Briefing*
This summary was generated by AI and may contain inaccuracies. Verify critical details independently.
🏢 Ownership & Registration
| Organization | DIALOGKOM-MNT |
| ASN | AS56812 |
| Network Name | DIALOG-NET |
| CIDR Block | 176.103.0.0/19 |
| RIR | RIPE |
| Country | UA |
| Abuse Contact | Available via RDAP |
🌐 DNS Intelligence
| PTR Record | No PTR |
| Forward Confirmed | No — PTR hostname does not resolve back to this IP (weak signal) |
🔐 DNS Hygiene
| Hygiene Score | 20% (Poor) |
| SPF | Not configured |
| DMARC | Not configured |
| FCrDNS | Not verified |
| DNSSEC | Valid |
| CAA | Not configured |
☁️ Network Classification
| Infrastructure | Unknown |
| Service Purpose | Firewalled / No Services |
| Network Tier | Unknown — Insufficient routing data to classify |
🔌 Services & Open Ports
| Port | Service | Protocol | Banner |
|---|---|---|---|
| No open ports detected | |||
| Closed Ports | 22, 25, 80, 443, 3389, 8080, 8443 (0 open / 7 scanned) | ||
| Server | — |
| HTTP Title | — |
🔐 TLS Certificate
| SANs | None |
| Valid From | — |
| Valid Until | — |
🛡️ Public Network Snapshot
| Origin ASN | AS56812 |
| Network Prefix | 176.103.0.0/20 |
| Route mapping | Found |
🎯 Confidence Breakdown
Per-dimension confidence scores based on source diversity and data freshness
| Dimension | Score | Sources | Observations |
|---|---|---|---|
| threat | 0% | 0 | 0 |
| routing | 0% | 0 | 0 |
| services | 0% | 0 | 0 |
| ownership | 0% | 0 | 0 |
| reputation | 0% | 0 | 0 |
| geolocation | 25% | 1 | 1 |
| Overall | 4% | 1 | 1 |
| Data Coherence | Mostly Consistent (80%) — 1 contradiction(s) |
| Attribution | Low (35%) |
| OwnershipFCrDNSGeo ConsensusGeo PlausibleIRR MatchRPKI Valid |
📅 Observation Timeline 🔄 Live
| First Seen | 2026-07-15 04:05:46 UTC |
| Last Seen | 2026-09-02 14:49:00 UTC |
| Profile Built | 2026-08-31 19:31:29 UTC |
| Data Freshness | Live |
| Signal Types | 19 |
| Total Observations | 22 |
Full dossier details are available via our API.
❓ Frequently Asked Questions About 176.103.0.208
Who owns the IP address 176.103.0.208?
176.103.0.208 is registered to DIALOGKOM-MNT. The address falls within the 176.103.0.0/19 network block. Registration is held at RIPE.
Where is 176.103.0.208 located?
Geolocation data places 176.103.0.208 in London, Kharkivs’ka Oblast’, United Kingdom. The local time zone is Europe/London. IP geolocation is approximate and indicates the network's registered or routed location rather than a precise physical address.
Is 176.103.0.208 malicious or safe?
176.103.0.208 currently carries a moderate risk assessment, meaning some indicators warrant caution, but the evidence is mixed. This assessment is generated from continuously collected signals and can change over time.