IP Intelligence Briefing: 176.103.2.179
Risk Score: 55 (Moderate Risk)
Ownership: Owned by DIALOGKOM-MNT (RIPE, Ukraine).
Geolocation: Ukraine, Kharkivska Oblast, Balakliya.
Threat Status: No active threats or malicious indicators detected.
Network Role: Firewalled / No Services (no open ports or TLS certificates).
Observation History:
- 23 total signals observed over 30 days.
- Mixed confidence levels: 15% high-confidence observations, 70% low-confidence.
- One low-confidence signal flagged potential threats (pulse count: 1).
Relationships:
- Linked to DIALOG-NET (same network).
- No connections to known malicious domains, organizations, or subnets.
Neighborhood Analysis:
- Subnet 176.103.2.0/24 contains 48 IPs.
- Abuse density: 4.2% (1 high-risk, 33 medium-risk, 12 low-risk IPs).
- Notable neighbors:
- 176.103.2.23 (55/100 risk score)
- 176.103.2.25 (55/100 risk score)
Recommended Actions:
1. Monitor: Increase logging verbosity for traffic from this IP due to moderate risk.
2. Block: Implement firewall rules to block the IP (rules provided in tool response).
3. Investigate: Scrutinize neighboring IPs (e.g., 176.103.2.23, 176.103.2.25) given their higher risk scores.
Note: No direct malicious activity detected, but contextual risks from the subnet warrant closer inspection.
This summary was generated by AI and may contain inaccuracies. Verify critical details independently.
π’ Ownership & Registration
| Organization | DIALOGKOM-MNT |
| ASN | AS56812 |
| Network Name | β |
| CIDR Block | 176.103.0.0/20 |
| RIR | RIPE |
| Country | β |
| Abuse Contact | Available via RDAP |
π DNS Intelligence
| PTR Record | No PTR |
| Forward Confirmed | No β PTR hostname does not resolve back to this IP (weak signal) |
π DNS Hygiene
| Hygiene Score | 20% (Poor) |
| SPF | Not configured |
| DMARC | Not configured |
| FCrDNS | Not verified |
| DNSSEC | Valid |
| CAA | Not configured |
βοΈ Network Classification
| Infrastructure | Unknown |
| Service Purpose | Firewalled / No Services |
| Network Tier | Tier 3 β Basic operator with some routing infrastructure |
π Services & Open Ports
| Port | Service | Protocol | Banner |
|---|---|---|---|
| No open ports detected | |||
| Closed Ports | 22, 25, 80, 443, 3389, 8080, 8443 (0 open / 7 scanned) | ||
| Server | β |
| HTTP Title | β |
π TLS Certificate
| SANs | None |
| Valid From | β |
| Valid Until | β |
π― Confidence Breakdown
Per-dimension confidence scores based on source diversity and data freshness
| Dimension | Score | Sources | Observations |
|---|---|---|---|
| threat | 31% | 2 | 4 |
| routing | 27% | 2 | 3 |
| services | 15% | 2 | 2 |
| ownership | 27% | 3 | 4 |
| reputation | 26% | 1 | 3 |
| geolocation | 21% | 2 | 2 |
| Overall | 24% | 12 | 18 |
| Data Coherence | Consistent (100%) |
| Attribution | Moderate (50%) |
| OwnershipFCrDNSGeo ConsensusGeo PlausibleIRR MatchRPKI Valid |
π Observation Timeline π Live
| First Seen | 2026-05-07 23:03:55 UTC |
| Last Seen | 2026-06-22 21:45:37 UTC |
| Profile Built | 2026-06-22 21:48:38 UTC |
| Data Freshness | Live |
| Signal Types | 23 |
| Total Observations | 25 |
Full dossier details are available via our API.