176.103.5.233📋 Copy

IP Intelligence Briefing: 176.103.5.233

Date: 2026-06-12

---

**1. Core Profile**

• Risk Score: 55 (Moderate Risk)
• Ownership: Registered to DIALOGKOM-MNT (ASN 56812), a Ukrainian provider.
• Geolocation: London, GB (IPv4 geolocation).
• Network Role: Firewalled / No Services (no open ports, TLS, or HTTP detected).
• Threat Indicators: No direct malicious activity (no indicators, blacklists, or campaigns).

---

**2. Observation History**

• Abuse Density: 0.2162 (21.62% of subnet 176.103.5.0/24 shows abuse risk).
• DNSBL Listings: Flagged in 3 of 8 DNSBL lists (high-severity threats).
• BGP Prefix: 176.103.0.0/20 (ASZARKO, Ukraine).
• DNSSEC: Valid.
• Recent Changes: No route stability issues detected in the last 30 days.

---

**3. Network Relationships**

• Subnet: 176.103.5.0/24 (36 total IPs).
• Risk Distribution:

- High Risk: 2 IPs (e.g., 176.103.5.65, 176.103.5.185).

- Medium Risk: 27 IPs.

- Low Risk: 7 IPs.

• Notable Neighbors:

- 176.103.5.65 (risk score 80), 176.103.5.185 (risk score 80), and 176.103.5.25 (risk score 70) show elevated risk.

---

**4. Threat Context**

• No Direct Malicious Activity: No indicators of spam, attacks, or campaigns linked to this IP.
• Subnet Risk: Moderate abuse density suggests potential for network compromise (e.g., compromised neighbors).
• DNSBL Flags: While not explicitly malicious, DNSBL listings (e.g., Spamhaus, SpamFrequently) warrant further investigation.

---

**5. Recommendations**

1. Monitor Subnet: Track high-risk neighbors (e.g., 176.103.5.65, 176.103.5.185) for unusual traffic patterns.

2. Verify DNSSEC: Confirm DNSSEC validity for 176.103.5.233 and related domains.

3. Check DNSBL Status: Investigate why this IP appears on 3 DNSBL lists (e.g., Spamhaus, SpamFrequently).

4. Network Segmentation: Consider isolating this subnet if it connects to internal assets.

5. BGP Analysis: Validate BGP configurations for 176.103.0.0/20 (ASZARKO) to prevent route hijacking.

---

Conclusion:

176.103.5.233 is a low-risk IP but resides in a subnet with mixed risk. While no direct threats are detected, the presence of high-risk neighbors and DNSBL listings necessitates closer monitoring. SOC teams should prioritize validating DNSSEC, investigating DNSBL flags, and ensuring subnet segmentation.

This summary was generated by AI and may contain inaccuracies. Verify critical details independently.