176.103.7.232
IP Intelligence Briefing: 176.103.7.232
Date: 2026-06-05
---
**1. Risk Profile**
- Overall Risk Score: High (80/100)
- Provider/Authority Scores: Unassigned (0)
- Network Stability: Unstable (flagged as "mostly_clean" but with inconsistent routing updates).
- Threat Indicators: No direct malicious activity detected (no malware, phishing, or C2 indicators).
---
**2. Ownership & Geolocation**
- Registered Owner: DIALOGKOM-MNT (RIPE, Ukraine)
- Location: Balakliya, Kharkivs’ka Oblast’, Ukraine (latitude 49.46, longitude 36.87).
- ASN: 56812 (DIALOG-NET).
- Network Role: Firewalled / No Services (no open ports, no TLS/HTTP services).
---
**3. Subnet & Neighborhood Analysis**
- Subnet: 176.103.7.0/24
- Abuse Density: 12.2% (moderate risk).
- Neighbor Risk Distribution:
- High Risk: 5 IPs (e.g., 176.103.7.9, 176.103.7.141, 176.103.7.247).
- Medium Risk: 23 IPs.
- Low Risk: 11 IPs.
- Notable Neighbors:
- 176.103.7.9 (risk score 80), 176.103.7.141 (80), and 176.103.7.247 (80) show elevated risk.
---
**4. Historical Observations**
- Consistency: Stable geolocation (Ukraine) and network ownership since 2026-05-29.
- Changes: No significant shifts in risk scores or network attributes.
- Geoplausibility: Confirmed via MaxMind and IPDebrief geolocation cross-checks.
---
**5. Relationships & Network Context**
- Linked Entities:
- Subnet: 176.103.0.0/19 (DIALOG-NET).
- No direct links to known malicious organizations or domains.
- Network Type: Private (no public DNS, no active services).
---
**6. Recommendations**
1. Monitor Subnet: Focus on high-risk neighbors (e.g., 176.103.7.9, 176.103.7.141) for potential lateral movement or network compromise.
2. Verify Ownership: Confirm DIALOGKOM-MNT’s legitimacy and check for recent ASN changes.
3. Enable Subnet Filtering: Consider blocking the 176.103.7.0/24 subnet if traffic is suspicious, given the moderate abuse density.
4. Check for Anomalies: Investigate if the IP’s stability score (0) correlates with routing instability or misconfigurations.
---
Conclusion: While the IP itself shows no direct malicious activity, its subnet contains high-risk neighbors. SOC teams should prioritize monitoring the subnet for potential indirect threats.
This summary was generated by AI and may contain inaccuracies. Verify critical details independently.
🏢 Ownership & Registration
| Organization | DIALOGKOM-MNT |
| ASN | AS56812 |
| Network Name | — |
| CIDR Block | — |
| RIR | RIPE |
| Country | — |
| Abuse Contact | Available via RDAP |
🌐 DNS Intelligence
| PTR Record | No PTR |
| Forward Confirmed | No — PTR hostname does not resolve back to this IP (weak signal) |
🔐 DNS Hygiene
| Hygiene Score | 20% (Poor) |
| SPF | Not configured |
| DMARC | Not configured |
| FCrDNS | Not verified |
| DNSSEC | Valid |
| CAA | Not configured |
☁️ Network Classification
| Infrastructure | Unknown |
| Service Purpose | Firewalled / No Services |
| Network Tier | Unknown — Insufficient routing data to classify |
🔌 Services & Open Ports
| Port | Service | Protocol | Banner |
|---|---|---|---|
| No open ports detected | |||
| Server | — |
| HTTP Title | — |
🔐 TLS Certificate
| SANs | None |
| Valid From | — |
| Valid Until | — |
🎯 Confidence Breakdown
Per-dimension confidence scores based on source diversity and data freshness
| Dimension | Score | Sources | Observations |
|---|---|---|---|
| threat | 35% | 2 | 3 |
| routing | 19% | 1 | 2 |
| services | 13% | 1 | 1 |
| ownership | 30% | 2 | 3 |
| reputation | 13% | 1 | 2 |
| geolocation | 23% | 2 | 2 |
| Overall | 22% | 9 | 13 |
| Data Coherence | Consistent (100%) |
| Attribution | Moderate (50%) |
| OwnershipFCrDNSGeo ConsensusGeo PlausibleIRR MatchRPKI Valid |
📅 Observation Timeline 🔄 Live
| First Seen | 2026-05-12 15:47:05 UTC |
| Last Seen | 2026-06-09 20:26:53 UTC |
| Profile Built | 2026-06-06 12:30:18 UTC |
| Data Freshness | Live |
| Signal Types | 15 |
| Total Observations | 15 |
Full dossier details are available via our API.