176.65.132.215
IP Intelligence Briefing: 176.65.132.215
*Generated via IPDebrief Analysis*
---
**1. Core Profile**
- Risk Score: 40 (Moderate Risk)
- Ownership: ASN 51396 (Abuse), registered to "Abuse" (RIPE).
- Geolocation: Amsterdam, Netherlands (51.68°N, 7.7°E).
- Threat Indicators: No direct malicious activity detected (no indicators, blacklists, or campaigns).
- Network Role: Firewalled / No Services (no open ports, TLS, or HTTP services).
- Control Plane:
- Subnet: 176.65.132.0/24
- Abuse Density: 63.16% (high abuse classification).
- Inherited Risk: 25 (subnetwork-level risk).
---
**2. Observation History**
- Latest Signals (June 2026):
- Basic operator score: 0.26 (Basic).
- Threat signal confidence: 20.62% (low).
- Subnet abuse density: 63.16% (high).
- Temporal Trends:
- No persistent malicious activity (threat persistence: 0 days).
- Single observation recorded (1 threat signal, 1 subnet analysis).
---
**3. Relationships**
- Linked Entities:
- VMHeaven (network/service, 34+ relationships).
- No direct connections to known malicious organizations or domains.
- Network Context:
- Part of a subnet with 38 IPs, 24 of which are flagged as threats.
---
**4. Neighborhood Analysis**
- Subnet: 176.65.132.0/24
- Risk Distribution:
- High-risk neighbors: 3 (80 score).
- Medium-risk neighbors: 34 (40–55 score).
- Low-risk neighbors: 0.
- Key Neighbors:
- 176.65.132.129 (80 score), 176.65.132.149 (65 score), 176.65.132.171 (40 score).
---
**5. Threat Assessment**
- Direct Threat: None detected (no indicators, DNS, or services).
- Indirect Risk:
- Subnet has high abuse density (63.16%).
- Linked to VMHeaven (potential network/service with unknown reputation).
- 24/38 neighbors are high-risk, suggesting a compromised subnet.
---
**6. Recommendations**
1. Monitor Subnet: Investigate 176.65.132.0/24 for lateral movement or shared infrastructure risks.
2. Block High-Risk Neighbors: Consider blocking IPs like 176.65.132.129 and 176.65.132.149.
3. Verify VMHeaven: Assess the legitimacy of the network/service linked to this IP.
4. Enhance Subnet Security: Ensure network segmentation to mitigate risks from compromised neighbors.
---
*End of Briefing*
This summary was generated by AI and may contain inaccuracies. Verify critical details independently.
🏢 Ownership & Registration
| Organization | Abuse |
| ASN | AS51396 |
| Network Name | — |
| CIDR Block | — |
| RIR | RIPE |
| Country | — |
| Abuse Contact | Available via RDAP |
🌐 DNS Intelligence
| PTR Record | No PTR |
| Forward Confirmed | No — PTR hostname does not resolve back to this IP (weak signal) |
🔐 DNS Hygiene
| Hygiene Score | 40% (Fair) |
| SPF | Not configured |
| DMARC | Not configured |
| FCrDNS | Not verified |
| DNSSEC | Valid |
| CAA | Present |
☁️ Network Classification
| Infrastructure | Unknown |
| Service Purpose | Firewalled / No Services |
| Network Tier | Tier 3 — Basic operator with some routing infrastructure |
🔌 Services & Open Ports
| Port | Service | Protocol | Banner |
|---|---|---|---|
| No open ports detected | |||
| Server | — |
| HTTP Title | — |
🔐 TLS Certificate
| SANs | None |
| Valid From | — |
| Valid Until | — |
🎯 Confidence Breakdown
Per-dimension confidence scores based on source diversity and data freshness
| Dimension | Score | Sources | Observations |
|---|---|---|---|
| threat | 26% | 2 | 3 |
| routing | 13% | 1 | 1 |
| services | 11% | 1 | 2 |
| ownership | 20% | 2 | 3 |
| reputation | 23% | 1 | 3 |
| geolocation | 21% | 2 | 2 |
| Overall | 19% | 9 | 14 |
| Data Coherence | Mostly Consistent (80%) — 1 contradiction(s) |
| Attribution | Low (35%) |
| OwnershipFCrDNSGeo ConsensusGeo PlausibleIRR MatchRPKI Valid |
📅 Observation Timeline 🔄 Live
| First Seen | 2026-05-07 23:03:56 UTC |
| Last Seen | 2026-06-22 22:00:20 UTC |
| Profile Built | 2026-06-22 22:09:35 UTC |
| Data Freshness | Live |
| Signal Types | 21 |
| Total Observations | 23 |
Full dossier details are available via our API.