IPDebrief

178.219.104.216

IP Intelligence Dossier
Your IP: 216.73.217.135
{ } JSON πŸ”§ Full Actions API
πŸ€– Witness AIThis summary was generated by AI and may contain inaccuracies. Verify critical details independently.

IP Intelligence Briefing: 178.219.104.216

Date: 2026-06-06

---

**1. Core Profile**

---

**2. Observation History**

- Geolocation data confirmed as plausible (MaxMind database).

- Network ownership tied to MOKADI (CIDR: 178.219.96.0/20).

- Scanning activity detected on 2026-05-29 (no open services found).

- DNSBL listings: 3 entries (potential abuse risk).

---

**3. Relationships & Network Context**

- Subnet: 178.219.104.216/24 (abuse density: 0.5, mixed risk).

- Same network: MOKADI (Kamil Kazmierczak).

- 6 sibling IPs in the subnet (2 active, 2 high-risk).

- High-risk neighbors: 178.219.104.93 (80), 178.219.104.99 (80), 178.219.104.193 (80).

---

**4. Threat & Risk Summary**

- DNSBL listings (3/8) suggest potential abuse.

- Subnet has 2 high-risk neighbors (80 score).

- Owner’s network (MOKADI) has no abuse reports but is linked to a single entity.

---

**5. Recommendations**

1. Monitor Neighbors: Focus on IPs 178.219.104.93, 178.219.104.99, and 178.219.104.193 for unusual activity.

2. Check DNSBLs: Investigate the 3 DNSBL listings (e.g., Spamhaus, Barracuda).

3. Network Segmentation: Ensure firewalled isolation, as no services are exposed.

4. Owner Verification: Confirm Kamil Kazmierczak’s legitimacy via RDAP or local registries.

Conclusion: Low direct risk but elevated indirect risk due to subnet context. Monitor for lateral movement or network compromise.

---

*Generated by IPDebrief Threat Intelligence Platform.*

This summary was generated by AI and may contain inaccuracies. Verify critical details independently.

🌍 Geolocation

CountryπŸ‡΅πŸ‡± Poland
RegionŁódΕΊ Voivodeship
CityGmina Moszczenica
TimezoneEurope/Warsaw
Latitude51.92
Longitude19.15

🏒 Ownership & Registration

OrganizationKamil Kazmierczak
ASNAS51079
Network Nameβ€”
CIDR Blockβ€”
RIRRIPE
Countryβ€”
Abuse ContactAvailable via RDAP

🌐 DNS Intelligence

PTR RecordNo PTR
Forward ConfirmedNo β€” PTR hostname does not resolve back to this IP (weak signal)

πŸ” DNS Hygiene

Hygiene Score20% (Poor)
SPFNot configured
DMARCNot configured
FCrDNSNot verified
DNSSECValid
CAANot configured

☁️ Network Classification

InfrastructureUnknown
Service PurposeFirewalled / No Services
Network TierUnknown β€” Insufficient routing data to classify
No specific classification

πŸ”Œ Services & Open Ports

PortServiceProtocolBanner
No open ports detected
Closed Ports22, 25, 80, 443, 3389, 8080, 8443 (0 open / 7 scanned)
Serverβ€”
HTTP Titleβ€”

πŸ” TLS Certificate

πŸ”’
No certificate
Issued by β€”
N/A
SANsNone
Valid Fromβ€”
Valid Untilβ€”

🎯 Confidence Breakdown

Per-dimension confidence scores based on source diversity and data freshness

DimensionScoreSourcesObservations
threat
27%
23
routing
25%
11
services
19%
22
ownership
30%
23
reputation
13%
12
geolocation
23%
22
Overall23%1013
Coverage: 6/6 dimensions Β· Data sufficiency: sufficient
Data CoherenceConsistent (100%)
AttributionModerate (50%)
OwnershipFCrDNSGeo ConsensusGeo PlausibleIRR MatchRPKI Valid

πŸ“… Observation Timeline πŸ”„ Live

First Seen2026-05-13 06:37:35 UTC
Last Seen2026-06-06 18:24:52 UTC
Profile Built2026-06-06 18:27:21 UTC
Data FreshnessLive
Signal Types17
Total Observations18
πŸ” 17 signal types Β· 18 observations collected
This report is generated from 17+ independent intelligence signals including ownership records, DNS analysis, BGP routing, TLS certificates, port scanning, threat feeds, behavioral fingerprinting, and more.
Full dossier details are available via our API.
{ } JSON API πŸ”§ Actions API πŸ“§ Enterprise Access

ℹ️ About This Report

All data shown is publicly available network metadata β€” IP addresses do not reliably identify individuals. Assessments are probabilistic and should not be used as sole basis for access control decisions. To report an issue or request data review, contact admin@ipdebrief.com.