IPDebrief

185.169.4.232

IP Intelligence Dossier
Your IP: 216.73.216.5
{ } JSON ๐Ÿ”ง Full Actions API
๐Ÿค– Witness AIThis summary was generated by AI and may contain inaccuracies. Verify critical details independently.

# IP Intelligence Briefing: 185.169.4.232/32

Classification: Moderate Risk (Score: 55/100)

Date: 2026-07-29

Prepared By: IPDebrief Intelligence Team

---

## Executive Summary

IP 185.169.4.232 is classified as a Moderate Risk address associated with hosting infrastructure provider INFOCOM-MNT. The IP exhibits elevated risk characteristics including RDP service exposure, DNSBL listing, and moderate operator scores. While the immediate threat indicators are limited, the risk profile warrants monitoring and consideration for blocking in defensive security contexts.

---

## Technical Profile

AttributeValue
**ASN**209605 (INFOCOM-MNT)
**Network Block**185.169.4.128/25 (SERVEROFFER_LT)
**Geolocation**Lithuania (LT), Vilnius
**RIR**RIPE
**Service Purpose**Single-Service Host
**RISK SCORE**55/100 (Moderate Risk)
**Abuse Confidence**Listed on 3 of 8 DNSBL lists

---

## Network Services & Exposure

Analysis: The RDP service exposure indicates potential vulnerability to remote access attacks. This is a common target for brute-force and exploitation attempts.

---

## Threat Indicators

Analysis: Limited direct threat attribution. The DNSBL listings suggest prior abuse history, though not necessarily current activity.

---

## Neighborhood Analysis

Subnet: 185.169.4.0/24

Total Siblings: 24

Active Siblings: 12

Abuse Density: 0.087 (Low-Moderate)

High-Risk Neighbors Identified:

Assessment: The subnet contains 2 high-risk peers, indicating potential abuse infrastructure clustering. Targeted monitoring of adjacent IPs is recommended.

---

## Observation History

Total Observations: 13 signals

Recent Activity: July 2026

Key Signals:

Temporal Analysis: No persistent malicious activity detected. IP shows minimal threat persistence indicators.

---

## Recommended Actions

Immediate

Firewall Rules

```bash

# iptables

iptables -A INPUT -s 185.169.4.232 -j DROP

# nftables

nft add rule inet filter input ip saddr 185.169.4.232 drop

# Cloudflare WAF

{"description":"Block 185.169.4.232 โ€” IPDebrief risk score 55","action":"block","filter":{"expression":"ip.src eq 185.169.4.232"}}

# AWS WAF

{"Addresses":["185.169.4.232/32"],"Description":"IPDebrief risk 55"}

```

Strategic Considerations

---

## Risk Assessment Summary

Risk FactorSeverityNotes
Service ExposureMediumRDP open to internet
DNSBL ListingsLow3/8 lists (limited impact)
Neighborhood RiskMedium2 high-risk neighbors
Campaign AttributionNoneNo known malware/campaign links
Historical PersistenceLowNo persistent malicious behavior

Overall Recommendation: Block at perimeter with enhanced logging. Monitor for activity patterns and consider subnet-level controls if abuse indicators increase.

---

*Intel generated by IPDebrief. All data sourced from publicly available threat intelligence feeds and network reconnaissance.*

This summary was generated by AI and may contain inaccuracies. Verify critical details independently.

๐ŸŒ Geolocation

Country๐Ÿ‡ฌ๐Ÿ‡ง United Kingdom
RegionVilnius
CityVilnius
TimezoneEurope/London
Latitudeโ€”
Longitudeโ€”

๐Ÿข Ownership & Registration

OrganizationINFOCOM-MNT
ASNAS209605
Network NameSERVEROFFER_LT
CIDR Block185.169.4.128/25
RIRRIPE
CountryLT
Abuse ContactAvailable via RDAP

๐ŸŒ DNS Intelligence

PTR RecordNo PTR
Forward ConfirmedNo โ€” PTR hostname does not resolve back to this IP (weak signal)

๐Ÿ” DNS Hygiene

Hygiene Score20% (Poor)
SPFNot configured
DMARCNot configured
FCrDNSNot verified
DNSSECValid
CAANot configured

โ˜๏ธ Network Classification

InfrastructureUnknown
Service PurposeSingle-Service Host
Network TierUnknown โ€” Insufficient routing data to classify
No specific classification

๐Ÿ”Œ Services & Open Ports

PortServiceProtocolBanner
3389rdptcpโ€”
Closed Ports22, 25, 80, 443, 8080, 8443 (1 open / 7 scanned)
Serverโ€”
HTTP Titleโ€”

๐Ÿ” TLS Certificate

๐Ÿ”’
No certificate
Issued by โ€”
N/A
SANsNone
Valid Fromโ€”
Valid Untilโ€”

๐ŸŽฏ Confidence Breakdown

Per-dimension confidence scores based on source diversity and data freshness

DimensionScoreSourcesObservations
threat
35%
22
routing
25%
11
services
25%
11
ownership
0%
00
reputation
25%
11
geolocation
25%
11
Overall22%66
Coverage: 5/6 dimensions ยท Data sufficiency: partial
Data CoherenceConsistent (100%)
AttributionModerate (50%)
OwnershipFCrDNSGeo ConsensusGeo PlausibleIRR MatchRPKI Valid

๐Ÿ“… Observation Timeline ๐Ÿ”„ Live

First Seen2026-07-21 19:03:06 UTC
Last Seen2026-07-29 10:26:03 UTC
Profile Built2026-07-29 10:39:54 UTC
Data FreshnessLive
Signal Types14
Total Observations14
๐Ÿ” 14 signal types ยท 14 observations collected
This report is generated from 14+ independent intelligence signals including ownership records, DNS analysis, BGP routing, TLS certificates, port scanning, threat feeds, behavioral fingerprinting, and more.
Full dossier details are available via our API.
{ } JSON API ๐Ÿ”ง Actions API ๐Ÿ“ง Enterprise Access

โ„น๏ธ About This Report

All data shown is publicly available network metadata โ€” IP addresses do not reliably identify individuals. Assessments are probabilistic and should not be used as sole basis for access control decisions. To report an issue or request data review, contact admin@ipdebrief.com.