# IP Intelligence Briefing: 186.68.116.230/32
Classification: Low Risk
Risk Score: 25/100
Date: Current
---
## Executive Summary
Target IP 186.68.116.230 presents a low-risk profile with no active threat indicators. The IP is assigned to ASN 14522 (Xtrim EC) within the 186.68.112.0/20 block. Current observation shows the host is firewalled with no open services. No malicious activity patterns detected in observation history or neighborhood analysis.
---
## Technical Profile
Ownership & Registration:
- ASN: 14522
- Organization: Xtrim EC
- Network Block: 186.68.112.0 - 186.68.127.255 (186.68.112.0/20)
- RIR: LACNIC
- Abuse Contact: Available via RDAP
Geolocation:
- Primary Location: New York, US
- Alternate Location: Guayaquil, Ecuador (per MaxMind Geolite2)
- GeoConsensus: False (multiple sources disagree)
- Timezone: America/New_York
DNS Resolution:
- PTR Hostname: 230.186-68-116-0.portovelo.gye.satnet.net
- Forward Resolution: Confirmed (1 hostname)
- DNSSEC: Valid
Network Services:
- Open Ports: None detected
- TLS Certificate: None
- HTTP Banner: None
- Classification: Firewalled / No Services
---
## Threat Indicators
Threat Classification:
- Abuse Confidence Score: Not assigned
- Blacklist Count: 0
- Pulsedive Risk: Not available
- Known Campaigns: None
- Tor Exit Node: No
- Known Attacker: No
- Spam Source: No
Control Plane:
- BGP Prefix: 186.68.112.0/20
- Route Stability: False
- RPKI State: Not available
- DNSBL Listed: 1 of 8 total lists
---
## Historical Observations
Observation Count: 16 signals recorded
Key Historical Signals:
- Ownership registered to Xtrim EC (cfrancis@xtrim.com.ec)
- Geolocation data indicates Guayaquil, Ecuador (EC)
- Operator Score: 0.15 (Minimal)
- Threat Persistence Days: 0
- Persistently Malicious: False
---
## Relationship Analysis
Detected Relationships:
- Same Network: 186.68.112.0 - 186.68.127.255 (2 entries)
- DNS Association: 230.186-68-116-0.portovelo.gye.satnet.net (3 entries)
No additional correlated entities identified.
---
## Neighborhood Analysis
Subnet: 186.68.116.230/24
- Total Siblings: 1
- Active Siblings: 0
- Threat Siblings: 0
- Abuse Density: 0
- Classification: Clean
- Risk Distribution: High/Medium/Low = 0/0/0
---
## Recommended Actions
Current Risk Score: 25/100
No specific firewall rules or security actions recommended at this time based on current risk profile. The IP shows minimal operator activity and clean neighborhood data.
---
## Intelligence Assessment
The target IP 186.68.116.230 demonstrates benign characteristics consistent with legitimate infrastructure. Key observations include:
1. Clean Threat Profile: No malicious indicators, blacklists, or campaign associations detected
2. Stable Ownership: Consistent assignment to Xtrim EC with no ownership changes
3. Low Neighborhood Risk: Subnet shows zero abuse density and clean classification
4. No Active Services: Host is firewalled with no open ports or services exposed
Recommendation: Monitor but no immediate defensive action required. The IP does not warrant blocking or enhanced scrutiny under current conditions.
---
*Briefing generated from IPDebrief intelligence platform data.*
This summary was generated by AI and may contain inaccuracies. Verify critical details independently.
🏢 Ownership & Registration
| Organization | Xtrim EC |
| ASN | AS14522 |
| Network Name | 186.68.112.0 - 186.68.127.255 |
| CIDR Block | 186.68.112.0/20 |
| RIR | LACNIC |
| Country | EC |
| Abuse Contact | Available via RDAP |
🌐 DNS Intelligence
| PTR | 230.186-68-116-0.portovelo.gye.satnet.net |
| Forward Confirmed | No — PTR hostname does not resolve back to this IP (weak signal) |
| Forward Hostnames | 230.186-68-116-0.portovelo.gye.satnet.net |
🔐 DNS Hygiene
| Hygiene Score | 40% (Fair) |
| SPF | Present |
| DMARC | Not configured |
| FCrDNS | Not verified |
| DNSSEC | Valid |
| CAA | Not configured |
☁️ Network Classification
| Infrastructure | Unknown |
| Service Purpose | Firewalled / No Services |
| Network Tier | Unknown — Insufficient routing data to classify |
🔌 Services & Open Ports
| Port | Service | Protocol | Banner |
|---|---|---|---|
| No open ports detected | |||
| Closed Ports | 22, 25, 80, 443, 3389, 8080, 8443 (0 open / 7 scanned) | ||
| Server | — |
| HTTP Title | — |
🔐 TLS Certificate
| SANs | None |
| Valid From | — |
| Valid Until | — |
🛡️ Public Network Snapshot
| Origin ASN | AS14522 |
| Network Prefix | 186.68.112.0/20 |
| Route mapping | Found |
🎯 Confidence Breakdown
Per-dimension confidence scores based on source diversity and data freshness
| Dimension | Score | Sources | Observations |
|---|---|---|---|
| threat | 35% | 2 | 2 |
| routing | 25% | 1 | 1 |
| services | 25% | 1 | 1 |
| ownership | 0% | 0 | 0 |
| reputation | 25% | 1 | 1 |
| geolocation | 0% | 0 | 0 |
| Overall | 18% | 5 | 5 |
| Data Coherence | Mostly Consistent (80%) — 1 contradiction(s) |
| Attribution | Low (35%) |
| OwnershipFCrDNSGeo ConsensusGeo PlausibleIRR MatchRPKI Valid |
📅 Observation Timeline 🔄 Live
| First Seen | 2026-07-05 23:58:13 UTC |
| Last Seen | 2026-08-27 04:47:30 UTC |
| Profile Built | 2026-08-29 05:55:03 UTC |
| Data Freshness | Live |
| Signal Types | 20 |
| Total Observations | 22 |
Full dossier details are available via our API.
❓ Frequently Asked Questions About 186.68.116.230
Who owns the IP address 186.68.116.230?
186.68.116.230 is registered to Xtrim EC. The address falls within the 186.68.112.0/20 network block. Registration is held at LACNIC.
Where is 186.68.116.230 located?
Geolocation data places 186.68.116.230 in New York, US-NY, United States. The local time zone is America/New_York. IP geolocation is approximate and indicates the network's registered or routed location rather than a precise physical address.
Is 186.68.116.230 malicious or safe?
186.68.116.230 currently carries a low risk assessment, meaning no significant threat indicators have been observed. This assessment is generated from continuously collected signals and can change over time.
What is the hostname for 186.68.116.230?
The reverse DNS (PTR) record for 186.68.116.230 is 230.186-68-116-0.portovelo.gye.satnet.net. This hostname is not forward-confirmed, so it should be treated as a weak signal.