192.81.131.83📋 Copy

# IP Intelligence Briefing: 192.81.131.83/32

## Executive Summary

IP address 192.81.131.83 is a Linode cloud computing host with a LOW risk profile (risk score: 25). No active threat indicators or malicious behavior observed. The IP is part of a cloud infrastructure network with mixed classification in its /24 subnet.

## Ownership and Infrastructure

• Provider: Linode (ASN 63949)
• Infrastructure Type: CloudCompute / Hosting
• CIDR Block: 192.81.128.0/21 (BGP prefix)
• Geolocation: Fremont, CA, US (claimed)
• Geolocation Validation: Implausible — RTT 83ms vs. minimum possible 176.9ms for 8,844km distance suggests routing anomalies or spoofed data

## Network Classification

• Cloud Provider: Yes
• CDN/Proxy/VPN: No
• Tor Exit Node: No
• Mobile/Residential: No
• Service Status: Firewalled / No services detected (no open ports)
• DNS: 192-81-131-83.ip.linodeusercontent.com (forward resolution confirmed)

## Threat Indicators

• Abuse Confidence: None reported
• Blacklist Count: 0 (dnsblListedCount: 1 of 8 lists)
• Known Campaigns: None
• Threat Feeds: Empty
• Status: Not flagged as known attacker, spam source, or malicious activity

## Neighborhood Analysis

• Subnet: 192.81.131.0/24
• Abuse Density: 0% (neighborhood analysis)
• Risk Classification: Mixed
• Siblings Analyzed: 5
• Risk Distribution: 5 low risk, 0 medium, 0 high
• Notable Neighbors: 192.81.131.55, 192.81.131.94, 192.81.131.109, 192.81.131.174 (risk score 25); 192.81.131.82 (risk score 0)

## Observation History

• Total Observations: 25 signals
• Recent Activity: 2026-06-25 (within 24 hours)
• Threat Persistence: 0 days (not persistently malicious)
• Ownership Stability: Consistent Linode hosting classification

## Recommended Actions

Based on current risk profile (25/100), no immediate blocking is recommended. Monitor for:

• Emerging threat indicators
• Changes in DNS resolution patterns
• Subnet abuse density increases

## Intelligence Narrative

IP 192.81.131.83 presents as a standard Linode cloud hosting address with no current malicious indicators. The low-risk score and absence of threat indicators suggest legitimate infrastructure use. The single DNSBL listing warrants awareness but does not indicate confirmed malicious activity. Network positioning within the /24 subnet shows consistent low-risk classification across neighbors. The geolocation discrepancy (RTT vs. claimed distance) is a minor anomaly but does not compromise the IP's legitimate infrastructure classification. SOC analysts may allow traffic with standard monitoring.

---

*Report generated by IPDebrief Intelligence Platform*

This summary was generated by AI and may contain inaccuracies. Verify critical details independently.