IPDebrief

196.0.122.122

IP Intelligence Dossier
Your IP: 216.73.216.123
{ } JSON πŸ”§ Full Actions API
πŸ€– Witness AIThis summary was generated by AI and may contain inaccuracies. Verify critical details independently.

## Intelligence Briefing: 196.0.122.122/32

Classification: HIGH RISK THREAT INDICATOR

Date: 2026-06-23

Executive Summary

IP address 196.0.122.122 is classified as high risk (score: 80/100) with elevated threat indicators. The address is associated with ASN 21491 (Kevin Mugaya Francis, ORG-UTL1-AFRINIC) and registered under the African Internet Registry (AFRINIC). Geolocation data indicates placement in Kampala, Uganda, Central Region.

Threat Profile

Network Context

The IP resides in subnet 196.0.122.0/24, classified as high abuse density. Neighborhood analysis identified 9 sibling IPs with the following risk distribution:

Subnet abuse density: 0.222 (6 threat-sibling IPs out of 10 active siblings).

Historical Observations

Sixteen observations recorded over the monitoring period. Recent signals (2026-06-23) show:

Related Entities

All relationship data points to ORG-UTL1-AFRINIC (same network classification). No correlated certificates or hostnames detected.

Recommended Actions

Immediate:

Firewall Rules:

Assessment

The IP demonstrates elevated risk characteristics with DNS blacklist presence and unstable routing. The high-abuse subnet context suggests potential for coordinated malicious activity. Recommend blocking and monitoring for correlated traffic patterns from associated subnet addresses.

This summary was generated by AI and may contain inaccuracies. Verify critical details independently.

🌍 Geolocation

CountryπŸ‡ΊπŸ‡¬ UG
RegionCentral Region
CityKampala
Timezoneβ€”
Latitude0.32
Longitude32.57

🏒 Ownership & Registration

OrganizationKevin Mugaya Francis
ASNAS21491
Network NameORG-UTL1-AFRINIC
CIDR Block196.0.0.0/16
RIRAFRINIC
CountryUG
Abuse Contactβ€”

🌐 DNS Intelligence

PTR RecordNo PTR
Forward ConfirmedNo β€” PTR hostname does not resolve back to this IP (weak signal)

πŸ” DNS Hygiene

Hygiene Score20% (Poor)
SPFNot configured
DMARCNot configured
FCrDNSNot verified
DNSSECValid
CAANot configured

☁️ Network Classification

InfrastructureUnknown
Service PurposeWeb Server
Network TierUnknown β€” Insufficient routing data to classify
No specific classification

πŸ”Œ Services & Open Ports

PortServiceProtocolBanner
80httptcpβ€”
443httpstcpβ€”
22sshtcp
Closed Ports25, 3389, 8080, 8443 (3 open / 7 scanned)
Serverlighttpd/1.4.39
HTTP Titleβ€”
SSH VersionSSH-2.0-dropbear <????4g[$u??T?curve25519-sha256,curve25519-sha256@libssh.org,diffie-hellman-group1

πŸ” TLS Certificate

πŸ”’
No certificate
Issued by β€”
N/A
SANsNone
Valid Fromβ€”
Valid Untilβ€”

🎯 Confidence Breakdown

Per-dimension confidence scores based on source diversity and data freshness

DimensionScoreSourcesObservations
threat
36%
24
routing
13%
11
services
29%
23
ownership
21%
22
reputation
28%
13
geolocation
13%
11
Overall23%914
Coverage: 6/6 dimensions Β· Data sufficiency: sufficient
Data CoherenceConsistent (100%)
AttributionModerate (50%)
OwnershipFCrDNSGeo ConsensusGeo PlausibleIRR MatchRPKI Valid

πŸ“… Observation Timeline πŸ”„ Live

First Seen2026-05-07 23:04:05 UTC
Last Seen2026-06-23 03:43:10 UTC
Profile Built2026-06-23 03:50:03 UTC
Data FreshnessLive
Signal Types16
Total Observations17
πŸ” 16 signal types Β· 17 observations collected
This report is generated from 16+ independent intelligence signals including ownership records, DNS analysis, BGP routing, TLS certificates, port scanning, threat feeds, behavioral fingerprinting, and more.
Full dossier details are available via our API.
{ } JSON API πŸ”§ Actions API πŸ“§ Enterprise Access

ℹ️ About This Report

All data shown is publicly available network metadata β€” IP addresses do not reliably identify individuals. Assessments are probabilistic and should not be used as sole basis for access control decisions. To report an issue or request data review, contact admin@ipdebrief.com.