Your IP: 216.73.216.123
π€ Witness AIThis summary was generated by AI and may contain inaccuracies. Verify critical details independently.
IP Intelligence Briefing: 196.0.89.94
Date: 2026-06-17
---
**1. Core Profile**
- Risk Score: 55 (Moderate Risk)
- Ownership: Registered to Kevin Mugaya Francis (ASN 21491, AFRINIC).
- Geolocation: Kampala, Central Region, Uganda (0.32°N, 32.57°E).
- Threat Indicators: No active threats, malware, or malicious campaigns detected.
- Network Role: Firewalled / No Services (no open ports, TLS, or HTTP activity).
---
**2. Observation History**
- Risk Trends: Minimal risk consistently recorded since June 2026.
- Threat Feeds: No blacklist or campaign associations.
- Stability: Subnet (196.0.89.94/24) shows 0.5 abuse density, with 1 high-risk neighbor (196.0.89.14, risk score 80) and 1 moderate-risk neighbor (196.0.89.130, risk score 55).
---
**3. Relationships & Context**
- Network Affiliation: Linked to ORG-UTL1-AFRINIC (AFRINIC-registed).
- Subnet Analysis:
- Total Siblings: 3 IPs (1 active, 2 inactive).
- Inherited Risk: 0 (no malicious activity in subnet).
- Neighbor Risks: One high-risk IP (196.0.89.14) warrants investigation.
---
**4. Recommendations**
- Monitor Subnet: Focus on 196.0.89.14 due to elevated risk.
- Verify Ownership: Confirm legitimacy of Kevin Mugaya Francis to rule out spoofing.
- Firewall Rules: Consider blocking 196.0.89.14 if further analysis confirms risk.
- Geolocation Validation: Cross-check with internal logs to ensure traffic is not spoofed.
---
Source: IPDebrief Threat Intelligence Platform
Note: No immediate action required for 196.0.89.94 itself, but subnet-level monitoring is advised.
This summary was generated by AI and may contain inaccuracies. Verify critical details independently.
π’ Ownership & Registration
| Organization | Kevin Mugaya Francis |
| ASN | AS21491 |
| Network Name | ORG-UTL1-AFRINIC |
| CIDR Block | 196.0.0.0/16 |
| RIR | AFRINIC |
| Country | UG |
| Abuse Contact | β |
π DNS Intelligence
| PTR Record | No PTR |
| Forward Confirmed | No β PTR hostname does not resolve back to this IP (weak signal) |
π DNS Hygiene
| Hygiene Score | 20% (Poor) |
| SPF | Not configured |
| DMARC | Not configured |
| FCrDNS | Not verified |
| DNSSEC | Valid |
| CAA | Not configured |
βοΈ Network Classification
| Infrastructure | Unknown |
| Service Purpose | Web Server |
| Network Tier | Unknown β Insufficient routing data to classify |
π Services & Open Ports
| Port | Service | Protocol | Banner |
|---|---|---|---|
| 80 | http | tcp | β |
| 443 | https | tcp | β |
| 22 | ssh | tcp | |
| Closed Ports | 25, 3389, 8080, 8443 (3 open / 7 scanned) | ||
| Server | lighttpd/1.4.39 |
| HTTP Title | β |
| SSH Version | SSH-2.0-dropbear <??u?*`H5ss??i'?curve25519-sha256,curve25519-sha256@libssh.org,diffie-hellman-grou |
π TLS Certificate
No certificate
Issued by β
N/A
| SANs | None |
| Valid From | β |
| Valid Until | β |
π― Confidence Breakdown
Per-dimension confidence scores based on source diversity and data freshness
| Dimension | Score | Sources | Observations |
|---|---|---|---|
| threat | 30% | 2 | 4 |
| routing | 13% | 1 | 1 |
| services | 32% | 2 | 3 |
| ownership | 21% | 2 | 2 |
| reputation | 28% | 1 | 3 |
| geolocation | 13% | 1 | 1 |
| Overall | 23% | 9 | 14 |
Coverage: 6/6 dimensions Β· Data sufficiency: sufficient
| Data Coherence | Consistent (100%) |
| Attribution | Moderate (50%) |
| OwnershipFCrDNSGeo ConsensusGeo PlausibleIRR MatchRPKI Valid |
π Observation Timeline π Fresh
| First Seen | 2026-05-07 23:04:05 UTC |
| Last Seen | 2026-06-26 18:11:00 UTC |
| Profile Built | 2026-06-26 04:39:32 UTC |
| Data Freshness | Fresh |
| Signal Types | 17 |
| Total Observations | 17 |
π 17 signal types Β· 17 observations collected
This report is generated from 17+ independent intelligence signals including
ownership records, DNS analysis, BGP routing, TLS certificates, port scanning, threat feeds,
behavioral fingerprinting, and more.
Full dossier details are available via our API.
Full dossier details are available via our API.
βΉοΈ About This Report
All data shown is publicly available network metadata β IP addresses do not reliably identify individuals.
Assessments are probabilistic and should not be used as sole basis for access control decisions.
To report an issue or request data review, contact admin@ipdebrief.com.