Your IP: 216.73.216.123
π€ Witness AIThis summary was generated by AI and may contain inaccuracies. Verify critical details independently.
IP Intelligence Briefing: 20.171.125.128/32
*Generated via IPDebrief Analysis*
---
**1. Core Profile**
- Risk Score: 25 (Low Risk)
- Ownership: Microsoft Corporation (ASN 8075, MSFT)
- Geolocation: Phoenix, AZ, US (33.45°N, -112.07°W)
- Network Role: Microsoft Azure CloudCompute (Firewalled / No Services)
- Threat Indicators: No malicious activity detected (no indicators, blacklists, or campaigns).
---
**2. Observation History (Last 30 Days)**
- Stability: Route stable (no recent changes).
- Geolocation Consensus: Confirmed via multi-signal inference.
- Threat Trends: No persistent malicious behavior (0 threat observations).
- DNSSEC: Validated (no DNSSEC issues).
---
**3. Network Relationships**
- Linked Entities:
- Subnet: `20.160.0.0/12` (Microsoft Azure infrastructure).
- Organization: Microsoft Corporation (AS 8075).
- No External Threat Links: No correlated IPs, campaigns, or certificates.
---
**4. Subnet Neighbors (/24)**
- Subnet: `20.171.125.0/24`
- Neighbor Risk Distribution:
- 2 IPs with low risk (25/100 score).
- 1 IP with neutral risk (0/100 score).
- Abuse Density: 0% (no suspicious activity in subnet).
---
**5. Recommended Actions**
- No Blocking Required: Legitimate Microsoft Azure infrastructure.
- Monitor: Track for unexpected service changes or neighbor activity.
- Verify: Confirm DNSSEC validity and geolocation consistency.
---
Conclusion:
The IP is a legitimate Microsoft Azure server with no observed malicious activity. No immediate defensive action is required. Focus on monitoring network behavior and ensuring compliance with cloud security best practices.
This summary was generated by AI and may contain inaccuracies. Verify critical details independently.
π’ Ownership & Registration
| Organization | Microsoft Corporation |
| ASN | AS8075 |
| Network Name | MSFT |
| CIDR Block | 20.160.0.0/12 |
| RIR | ARIN |
| Country | United States |
| Abuse Contact | Available via RDAP |
π DNS Intelligence
| PTR Record | No PTR |
| Forward Confirmed | No β PTR hostname does not resolve back to this IP (weak signal) |
π DNS Hygiene
| Hygiene Score | 20% (Poor) |
| SPF | Not configured |
| DMARC | Not configured |
| FCrDNS | Not verified |
| DNSSEC | Valid |
| CAA | Not configured |
βοΈ Network Classification
| Infrastructure | Infrastructure / Datacenter |
| Service Purpose | Firewalled / No Services |
| Network Tier | Hosting β Infrastructure provider without advanced routing |
π Services & Open Ports
| Port | Service | Protocol | Banner |
|---|---|---|---|
| No open ports detected | |||
| Closed Ports | 22, 25, 80, 443, 3389, 8080, 8443 (0 open / 7 scanned) | ||
| Server | β |
| HTTP Title | β |
π TLS Certificate
No certificate
Issued by β
N/A
| SANs | None |
| Valid From | β |
| Valid Until | β |
π― Confidence Breakdown
Per-dimension confidence scores based on source diversity and data freshness
| Dimension | Score | Sources | Observations |
|---|---|---|---|
| threat | 32% | 2 | 3 |
| routing | 13% | 1 | 1 |
| services | 19% | 2 | 2 |
| ownership | 27% | 2 | 3 |
| reputation | 17% | 1 | 2 |
| geolocation | 19% | 2 | 2 |
| Overall | 21% | 10 | 13 |
Coverage: 6/6 dimensions Β· Data sufficiency: sufficient
| Data Coherence | Consistent (100%) |
| Attribution | Moderate (50%) |
| OwnershipFCrDNSGeo ConsensusGeo PlausibleIRR MatchRPKI Valid |
π Observation Timeline π Live
| First Seen | 2026-06-03 18:31:23 UTC |
| Last Seen | 2026-06-21 10:42:34 UTC |
| Profile Built | 2026-06-21 11:00:03 UTC |
| Data Freshness | Live |
| Signal Types | 19 |
| Total Observations | 22 |
π 19 signal types Β· 22 observations collected
This report is generated from 19+ independent intelligence signals including
ownership records, DNS analysis, BGP routing, TLS certificates, port scanning, threat feeds,
behavioral fingerprinting, and more.
Full dossier details are available via our API.
Full dossier details are available via our API.
βΉοΈ About This Report
All data shown is publicly available network metadata β IP addresses do not reliably identify individuals.
Assessments are probabilistic and should not be used as sole basis for access control decisions.
To report an issue or request data review, contact admin@ipdebrief.com.