IP Intelligence Briefing: 20.61.127.54
Date: 2026-06-15
---
**1. Core Profile**
- Risk Score: 80 (High Risk)
- Ownership: Microsoft Corporation (AS8075)
- Geolocation: Amsterdam, Netherlands (52.37°N, 4.89°E)
- Network Role: Microsoft Azure CloudCompute (Firewalled / No Services)
- Threat Indicators: No direct malicious activity detected (no known campaigns, spam, or attacker lists).
---
**2. Observation History**
- Recent Activity:
- Observed with Alienvault-OTX (confidence 0.95) as a Microsoft server in Amsterdam.
- DNSSEC Valid but listed in 5 DNSBLs (e.g., Spamhaus, Emerging Threats).
- Threat Pulse Count: 12 (low-severity indicators).
- Trend: Stable risk profile with no significant changes over the last 30 days.
---
**3. Relationships**
- Network Affiliation: Directly linked to Microsoft Azure infrastructure (AS8075).
- Subnet: Part of the 20.48.0.0/12 BGP prefix (Microsoft-owned).
- No Known Malicious Associations: No correlated IPs or campaigns detected.
---
**4. Neighborhood Analysis**
- Subnet: 20.61.127.54/24
- Abuse Density: 0% (clean subnet).
- Neighbors:
- 1 active sibling (20.61.127.57) with a low risk score (0).
- No malicious siblings detected.
---
**5. Security Recommendations**
- Monitor DNSBL Listings: Investigate why this IP is listed in 5 DNSBLs (e.g., Spamhaus, Emerging Threats).
- Network Segmentation: Ensure Azure VMs are isolated in private subnets to prevent lateral movement.
- DNSSEC Validation: Confirm DNSSEC is enforced for all subdomains to mitigate spoofing risks.
- Traffic Filtering: Consider allowing traffic only from trusted sources, given its Azure infrastructure context.
---
Conclusion:
This IP is a Microsoft Azure VM in Amsterdam with no direct malicious activity. However, its DNSBL listings and high risk score warrant closer monitoring. The subnet is clean, but the IPβs association with Microsoftβs cloud infrastructure requires contextual evaluation to avoid disrupting legitimate operations.
This summary was generated by AI and may contain inaccuracies. Verify critical details independently.
π’ Ownership & Registration
| Organization | Microsoft Corporation |
| ASN | AS8075 |
| Network Name | β |
| CIDR Block | β |
| RIR | ARIN |
| Country | β |
| Abuse Contact | Available via RDAP |
π DNS Intelligence
| PTR Record | No PTR |
| Forward Confirmed | No β PTR hostname does not resolve back to this IP (weak signal) |
π DNS Hygiene
| Hygiene Score | 20% (Poor) |
| SPF | Not configured |
| DMARC | Not configured |
| FCrDNS | Not verified |
| DNSSEC | Valid |
| CAA | Not configured |
βοΈ Network Classification
| Infrastructure | Infrastructure / Datacenter |
| Service Purpose | Firewalled / No Services |
| Network Tier | Hosting β Infrastructure provider without advanced routing |
π Services & Open Ports
| Port | Service | Protocol | Banner |
|---|---|---|---|
| No open ports detected | |||
| Closed Ports | 22, 25, 80, 443, 3389, 8080, 8443 (0 open / 7 scanned) | ||
| Server | β |
| HTTP Title | β |
π TLS Certificate
| SANs | None |
| Valid From | β |
| Valid Until | β |
π― Confidence Breakdown
Per-dimension confidence scores based on source diversity and data freshness
| Dimension | Score | Sources | Observations |
|---|---|---|---|
| threat | 43% | 2 | 5 |
| routing | 8% | 1 | 1 |
| services | 12% | 2 | 2 |
| ownership | 24% | 2 | 3 |
| reputation | 31% | 1 | 3 |
| geolocation | 39% | 2 | 3 |
| Overall | 26% | 10 | 17 |
| Data Coherence | Consistent (100%) |
| Attribution | Moderate (50%) |
| OwnershipFCrDNSGeo ConsensusGeo PlausibleIRR MatchRPKI Valid |
π Observation Timeline π Live
| First Seen | 2026-05-19 21:39:56 UTC |
| Last Seen | 2026-06-28 09:57:47 UTC |
| Profile Built | 2026-06-29 04:01:53 UTC |
| Data Freshness | Live |
| Signal Types | 19 |
| Total Observations | 23 |
Full dossier details are available via our API.