IPDebrief

202.105.98.250

IP Intelligence Dossier
Your IP: 216.73.216.123
{ } JSON πŸ”§ Full Actions API
πŸ€– Witness AIThis summary was generated by AI and may contain inaccuracies. Verify critical details independently.

IP Intelligence Briefing: 202.105.98.250

*Generated via IPDebrief tools – Final Analysis*

---

Risk Profile

Key Observations

1. Ownership:

- Registered to IPMASTER CHINANET-GD (China Telecom).

- CIDR: 202.105.0.0/16 (part of APNIC’s Chinanet-GD network).

2. Geolocation Consistency:

- Primary location: Guangzhou, China.

- One anomalous geolocation signal inferred to Shanghai, China (latitude 35.86, longitude 104.2) with 52% confidence.

3. Network Behavior:

- Subnet 202.105.98.250/24 has 1 active sibling IP (202.105.98.252) with a risk score of 80 (High Risk).

- Subnet abuse density: 0.5 (mostly clean, but includes one high-risk IP).

4. Historical Activity:

- No persistent threats or ownership changes detected in 30 days.

- Geolocation inconsistencies noted but no confirmed malicious activity.

Relationships

Actionable Insights

Conclusion

The IP is associated with a legitimate China Telecom mobile connection in Guangzhou. While no direct threats are detected, the presence of a high-risk neighbor in the same subnet warrants further scrutiny. SOC teams should prioritize monitoring the 202.105.98.0/24 subnet for unusual activity.

*Tools used: ipdebrief_profile, ipdebrief_history, ipdebrief_relationships, ipdebrief_neighbors, ipdebrief_actions*

This summary was generated by AI and may contain inaccuracies. Verify critical details independently.

🌍 Geolocation

CountryπŸ‡¨πŸ‡³ China
RegionGD
CityShenzhen
Timezoneβ€”
Latitude23.12
Longitude113.25

🏒 Ownership & Registration

OrganizationIPMASTER CHINANET-GD
ASNAS4134
Network Nameβ€”
CIDR Blockβ€”
RIRAPNIC
Countryβ€”
Abuse ContactAvailable via RDAP

🌐 DNS Intelligence

PTR RecordNo PTR
Forward ConfirmedNo β€” PTR hostname does not resolve back to this IP (weak signal)

πŸ” DNS Hygiene

Hygiene Score20% (Poor)
SPFNot configured
DMARCNot configured
FCrDNSNot verified
DNSSECValid
CAANot configured

☁️ Network Classification

InfrastructureMobile
Service PurposeFirewalled / No Services
Network TierUnknown β€” Insufficient routing data to classify
Mobile

πŸ”Œ Services & Open Ports

PortServiceProtocolBanner
No open ports detected
Serverβ€”
HTTP Titleβ€”

πŸ” TLS Certificate

πŸ”’
No certificate
Issued by β€”
N/A
SANsNone
Valid Fromβ€”
Valid Untilβ€”

🎯 Confidence Breakdown

Per-dimension confidence scores based on source diversity and data freshness

DimensionScoreSourcesObservations
threat
31%
23
routing
13%
11
services
8%
11
ownership
35%
23
reputation
28%
13
geolocation
33%
24
Overall25%915
Coverage: 6/6 dimensions Β· Data sufficiency: sufficient
Data CoherenceConsistent (100%)
AttributionModerate (50%)
OwnershipFCrDNSGeo ConsensusGeo PlausibleIRR MatchRPKI Valid

πŸ“… Observation Timeline πŸ”„ Live

First Seen2026-05-12 03:43:31 UTC
Last Seen2026-06-26 15:05:14 UTC
Profile Built2026-06-26 15:15:05 UTC
Data FreshnessLive
Signal Types17
Total Observations19
πŸ” 17 signal types Β· 19 observations collected
This report is generated from 17+ independent intelligence signals including ownership records, DNS analysis, BGP routing, TLS certificates, port scanning, threat feeds, behavioral fingerprinting, and more.
Full dossier details are available via our API.
{ } JSON API πŸ”§ Actions API πŸ“§ Enterprise Access

ℹ️ About This Report

All data shown is publicly available network metadata β€” IP addresses do not reliably identify individuals. Assessments are probabilistic and should not be used as sole basis for access control decisions. To report an issue or request data review, contact admin@ipdebrief.com.