IPDebrief

212.87.215.23

IP Intelligence Dossier
Your IP: 216.73.216.5
{ } JSON ๐Ÿ”ง Full Actions API
๐Ÿค– Witness AIThis summary was generated by AI and may contain inaccuracies. Verify critical details independently.

## INTELLIGENCE BRIEFING: 212.87.215.23

Classification: LOW RISK

Report Date: 2026-07-29

Intel Level: Standard

---

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

IP 212.87.215.23 was analyzed and classified as LOW RISK with an overall risk score of 25/100. No active threat indicators, malicious campaigns, or behavioral anomalies were detected. The IP is currently firewalled with no services exposed.

---

RISK PROFILE

MetricValue
Risk Score25 (Low Risk)
Abuse ConfidenceNot applicable
Blacklist Count0
DNSBL Listings1 of 8
Provider Score0
Authority Score0

---

OWNERSHIP & GEOLOCATION

Network Information:

Geolocation:

---

NETWORK CLASSIFICATION

AttributeStatus
Open PortsNone
TLS CertificateN/A
HTTP TitleN/A
Server BannerNone
Is CloudFalse
Is CDNFalse
Is VPNFalse
Is ProxyFalse
Is TorFalse
Is HostingFalse
Is MobileFalse
Is ResidentialFalse
Service PurposeFirewalled / No Services

---

THREAT INDICATORS

Current Threat Status: CLEAN

---

NEIGHBORHOOD ANALYSIS

Subnet: 212.87.215.23/24

The IP exists in an isolated subnet with no neighboring addresses flagged for abuse or threat activity.

---

RELATIONSHIP GRAPH

No relationships detected. The IP shows no associations with:

---

OBSERVATION HISTORY

Total Observations: 11

Threat Persistence: 0 days

Ownership Changes: 0

Recent signals (July 2026) indicate:

---

CONTROL PLANE DATA

MetricValue
Is Route StableFalse
Route Changes (30d)0
RPKI StateNot assessed
IRR ConsistencyNot assessed
DNSSEC ValidTrue
Has CAAFalse
DNSBL Listed Count1
DNSBL Total Lists8

---

RECOMMENDED ACTIONS

Firewall/Blocking: NOT REQUIRED

The IP presents no actionable threat indicators. Standard monitoring practices are sufficient. No firewall rules or blocking actions are recommended.

Monitoring Recommendations:

---

ANALYST NOTES

This IP address demonstrates no malicious behavior patterns. The absence of open services, combined with clean threat indicators and zero neighborhood abuse density, supports classification as LOW RISK. The geolocation discrepancy (GB vs DE) is a common data inconsistency with prepaid hosting infrastructure and does not alter the threat assessment.

Status: NO ACTION REQUIRED

This summary was generated by AI and may contain inaccuracies. Verify critical details independently.

๐ŸŒ Geolocation

Country๐Ÿ‡ฉ๐Ÿ‡ช Germany
Regionโ€”
CityLondon
TimezoneEurope/Berlin
Latitude51.17
Longitude10.45

๐Ÿข Ownership & Registration

OrganizationDennis Ziolkowski
ASNAS44486
Network NamePrepaid-Hoster
CIDR Block212.87.214.0/23
RIRRIPE
CountryDE
Abuse ContactAvailable via RDAP

๐ŸŒ DNS Intelligence

PTR RecordNo PTR
Forward ConfirmedNo โ€” PTR hostname does not resolve back to this IP (weak signal)

๐Ÿ” DNS Hygiene

Hygiene Score20% (Poor)
SPFNot configured
DMARCNot configured
FCrDNSNot verified
DNSSECValid
CAANot configured

โ˜๏ธ Network Classification

InfrastructureUnknown
Service PurposeSingle-Service Host
Network TierUnknown โ€” Insufficient routing data to classify
No specific classification

๐Ÿ”Œ Services & Open Ports

PortServiceProtocolBanner
22sshtcp
Closed Ports25, 80, 443, 3389, 8080, 8443 (1 open / 7 scanned)
Serverโ€”
HTTP Titleโ€”
SSH VersionSSH-2.0-OpenSSH_9.6p1 Ubuntu-3ubuntu13.18

๐Ÿ” TLS Certificate

๐Ÿ”’
No certificate
Issued by โ€”
N/A
SANsNone
Valid Fromโ€”
Valid Untilโ€”

๐ŸŽฏ Confidence Breakdown

Per-dimension confidence scores based on source diversity and data freshness

DimensionScoreSourcesObservations
threat
25%
11
routing
25%
11
services
25%
11
ownership
0%
00
reputation
0%
00
geolocation
0%
00
Overall12%33
Coverage: 3/6 dimensions ยท Data sufficiency: partial
Data CoherenceConsistent (100%)
AttributionModerate (50%)
OwnershipFCrDNSGeo ConsensusGeo PlausibleIRR MatchRPKI Valid

๐Ÿ“… Observation Timeline ๐Ÿ”„ Live

First Seen2026-07-22 19:32:55 UTC
Last Seen2026-07-29 22:50:14 UTC
Profile Built2026-07-29 15:16:34 UTC
Data FreshnessLive
Signal Types17
Total Observations17
๐Ÿ” 17 signal types ยท 17 observations collected
This report is generated from 17+ independent intelligence signals including ownership records, DNS analysis, BGP routing, TLS certificates, port scanning, threat feeds, behavioral fingerprinting, and more.
Full dossier details are available via our API.
{ } JSON API ๐Ÿ”ง Actions API ๐Ÿ“ง Enterprise Access

โ„น๏ธ About This Report

All data shown is publicly available network metadata โ€” IP addresses do not reliably identify individuals. Assessments are probabilistic and should not be used as sole basis for access control decisions. To report an issue or request data review, contact admin@ipdebrief.com.