217.42.251.145
Intelligence report for IP 217.42.251.145 indicates a Low Risk reputation with a risk score of 25. Ownership is attributed to BT CENTRAL PLUS - OPERATIONAL SUPPORT (ASN 2856) within the Wrexham, Wales region. Geolocation data presented contradictions, with sources disagreeing between the United States and Great Britain.
Network analysis classified the service purpose as firewalled with no services running. Open ports were not detected, and reverse DNS resolution confirmed the hostname host217-42-251-145.range217-42.btcentralplus.com. No hosted domains were associated with the address. Threat intelligence feeds reported zero blacklist counts, zero known campaigns, and zero observed spam sources. Behavioral analysis recorded zero honeypot hits, enumeration strikes, or WAF violations.
Despite the Low Risk classification, the threat actor profile was labeled as a Suspicious Host due to the presence of threat indicators without specific classification. Control plane analysis noted one DNSBL listing out of eight checked lists. The overall recommendation was to Monitor the address due to signal contradictions, assigning a low severity rating. Data freshness confirmed the profile as live.
This summary was generated by AI and may contain inaccuracies. Verify critical details independently.
🏢 Ownership & Registration
| Organization | BT CENTRAL PLUS - OPERATIONAL SUPPORT |
| ASN | AS2856 |
| Network Name | BT-CENTRAL-PLUS |
| CIDR Block | 217.42.0.0/15 |
| RIR | RIPE |
| Country | GB |
| Abuse Contact | Available via RDAP |
🌐 DNS Intelligence
| PTR | host217-42-251-145.range217-42.btcentralplus.com |
| Forward Confirmed | Yes — FCrDNS verified |
| Forward Hostnames | host217-42-251-145.range217-42.btcentralplus.com |
🔐 DNS Hygiene
| Hygiene Score | 20% (Poor) |
| SPF | Not configured |
| DMARC | Not configured |
| FCrDNS | Verified |
| DNSSEC | Not signed |
| CAA | Not configured |
☁️ Network Classification
| Infrastructure | Unknown |
| Service Purpose | Firewalled / No Services |
| Network Tier | Unknown — Insufficient routing data to classify |
🔌 Services & Open Ports
| Port | Service | Protocol | Banner |
|---|---|---|---|
| No open ports detected | |||
| Closed Ports | 22, 25, 80, 443, 3389, 8080, 8443 (0 open / 7 scanned) | ||
| Server | — |
| HTTP Title | — |
🔐 TLS Certificate
| SANs | None |
| Valid From | — |
| Valid Until | — |
🎯 Confidence Breakdown
Per-dimension confidence scores based on source diversity and data freshness
| Dimension | Score | Sources | Observations |
|---|---|---|---|
| threat | 25% | 1 | 1 |
| routing | 25% | 1 | 1 |
| services | 25% | 1 | 1 |
| ownership | 0% | 0 | 0 |
| reputation | 0% | 0 | 0 |
| geolocation | 0% | 0 | 0 |
| Overall | 12% | 3 | 3 |
| Data Coherence | Mostly Consistent (80%) — 1 contradiction(s) |
| Attribution | Moderate (55%) |
| OwnershipFCrDNSGeo ConsensusGeo PlausibleIRR MatchRPKI Valid |
📅 Observation Timeline 🔄 Live
| First Seen | 2026-09-14 09:08:34 UTC |
| Last Seen | 2026-09-14 09:08:34 UTC |
| Profile Built | 2026-09-14 09:21:33 UTC |
| Data Freshness | Live |
| Signal Types | 20 |
| Total Observations | 20 |
Full dossier details are available via our API.